Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:17:59.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early grammatical and prosodic marking of utterance modality in French: a longitudinal case study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dominique Bassano*
Affiliation:
Université René Descartes, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Isabelle Mendes-Maillochon
Affiliation:
Université René Descartes, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
*
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, 28 rue Serpente, 75006 Paris, France.

Abstract

The study investigates how basic communicative functions expressed by utterance modalities (declarative, exclamative, injunctive, interrogative) emerged in the early language of a French child, and examines whether and how morphosyntactic and prosodic devices were used to mark these contrasts. A longitudinal corpus of naturalistic productions was collected between the ages of 1;2 and 1;9, and 960 utterances were subjected to functional, prosodic and grammatical analyses. Declarative, exclamative and injunctive utterances were found from 1;2, and first interrogatives appeared at 1;6. Intonation contours varied as a function of utterance modality and were largely in accordance with the patterns in French: declaratives and exclamatives were falling, interrogatives rising and injunctives split between falling and rising contours depending on their specific functions. A quarter of the productions involved an elementary grammatical marking of utterance modality such as interjections, imperative or indicative verbal forms, or interrogative morphemes. These findings indicate an early and complementary use of prosodic and grammatical devices in the child's construction of the linguistic system.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We are grateful to Pauline and her family for their gracious co-operation in the study. We should like to thank Pierre Hallé for his helpful participation in the prosodic instrumental analysis, and our friends from the University of Rouen who provided help in collecting data. We also acknowledge Madeleine Léveillé for assistance in data processing, and Connie Greenbaum for stylistic assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. & Galmiche, M.(1986). La grammaire d'aujourd'hui: guide alphabétique de linguistique française. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacri, N., de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Hallé, P. (1989). Prosodic processing in French and American infant's babbling. Proceedings of Speech Research 89. Hungarian Papers in Phonetics 22, 58.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar. Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21, 205–26.Google Scholar
Béchade, H. D. (1992). Phonétique et morphologie du français moderne et contemporain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J. & Marcos, H. (1990). Le développement des formes prélinguistiques et linguistiques de la demande: adaptation à la situation sociale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 22, 236–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1986). Prosodic development. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. (1980). Is early pragmatic development measurable? Journal of Child Language 7, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delattre, P. (1961). La leçon d'intonation de Simone de Beauvoir, étude d'intonation déclarative comparée. The French Review 35, 5967.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1981). Aspects phonétiques et phonologiques des éléments prosodiques. Modèles linguistiques 3, 2483.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1994). Intonation in French. In Hirst, D. & Di Cristo, A. (eds), Intonation systems: a study of twenty languages. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts and language universals. Journal of Child Language 2, 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J. (1977). Children's illocutionary Acts. In Freedle, R. O. (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L. & Franco, F. (1991). Selective production of vocalization types in different communication contexts. Journal of Child Language 18, 475–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducrot, O. (in press). La pragmatique et l'étude sémantique de la langue. In L'E.H.S.S.: Histoire d'une recherche. Paris: Cerf & Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Ferrier, L. J. (1985). Intonation in discourse: talk between 12-month-olds and their mothers. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Flax, J., Lahey, M., Harris, K. & Boothroyd, A. (1991). Relations between prosodic variables and communicative functions. Journal of Child Language 18, 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furrow, D. (1984). Young children's use of prosody. Journal of Child Language 11, 203–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furrow, D., Podrouzek, W. & Moore, C. (1990). The acoustical analysis of children's use of prosody in assertive and directive contexts. First Language 10, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, R. (1987). Intonation with single words: purposive and grammatical use. Journal of Child Language 14, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallé, P., de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Beginnings of prosodic organization: intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Language and Speech 34, 299318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: exploration in the development of language. London: Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963). Essais de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Levitt, A. G. (1993). The acquisition of prosody: evidence from French- and English-learning infants. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., MacNeilage, P., Morton, J. (eds), Change in speech and face processing in infancy: a glimpse at developmental mechanisms of cognition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics II. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1990). The child language data exchange system: an update. Journal of Child Language 17, 457–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcos, H. (1987). Communicative functions of pitch range and pitch direction in infants. Journal of Child Language 14, 255–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcos, H. (1991). Reformulating requests at 18 months: gestures, vocalizations and words. First Language 11, 361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1976). Control and contrast in beginning speech: a case study in the development of word form and word function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University Microfilm 76–24, 139.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1980). Prosodic aspects of speech productions. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix 6, 4972.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. (1986). Modality. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G. & Wang, Q. I. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 18, 501–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed