Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T02:38:26.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multi-functional approach to single-word usage*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Maris Monitz Rodgon ,
Wayne Jankowski  and
Lucias Alenskas
Maris Monitz Rodgon
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Wayne Jankowski
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Lucias Alenskas
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Language is conceptualized as a multi-dimensional entity which involves symbolic and cognitive aspects, communicative aspects, and structural-linguistic aspects, both syntactic and semantic. The child's task during acquisition is to become aware of, to understand, and to operate according to convention in these three spheres. Analysis of the single-word production of three children revealed developmental changes in the salience of the three aspects and individual differences in functional styles of language acquisition. Use of the multi-dimensional approach also revealed differences in the relations between language, overt action, and a child's tendency to talk about action. Many differences, particularly in communicative style, were related to differences in parent–child interaction.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 23 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by a grant to the first author from the Research Board of the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle. Portions of this paper were presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, 1975. Correspondence may be addressed to Maris M. Rodgon, Department of Psychology, UICC, PO Box 4348, Chicago, Illinois, 60680.

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. (1965). How to do things with words. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
De Laguna, G. (1927). Speech: its function and development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts, and language universals. JChLang 2. 20–40.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds), Universals of linguistic theory. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J. (1976). Communication and the beginnings of language: the development of semantic structure in one word speech and beyond. New York: Academic Press. (Working draft by Greenfield, P., Smith, J. & Laufer, B. (1972).)Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1974). A design for multivariate analysis of language behaviour and language development. L & S 17. 240–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Moerk, E. (1975). The multiple channels of the young child's communicative behaviour. Linguistics 160. 21–32.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgon, M. (1976). Single-word usage, cognitive development, and the beginnings of combinatorial speech: a study of ten English-speaking children. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Rodgon, M. & Kurdek, L. (1975). Vocal and gestural imitation in children under two years of age. Paper presented to the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schachter, F., Kirshner, K., Klips, B., Friedricks, M. & Sanders, K. (1974). Everyday preschool interpersonal speech usage: methodological, developmental, and sociolinguistic studies. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 39.Google Scholar
Schachter, F., Fosha, D., Stemp, S., Brotman, N. & Ganger, S. (1976). Everyday caretaker talk to toddlers vs. threes and fours. JChLang 3. 221–45.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1969). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. (eds), Studies in cognitive development: essays in honor of Jean Piaget. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1971). Sensorimotor action patterns as a condition for the acquisition of syntax. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar