Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:12:19.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sound-meaning correspondences in babbling*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Joanna Blake*
Affiliation:
York University
Robert Fink
Affiliation:
York University
*
Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele St, North York, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.

Abstract

The hypothesis that prelinguistic vocalizations contain extensive and systematic sound-meaning correspondences was examined through an exhaustive analysis of the babbling of five infants in their second year. These infants were videotaped over a period of three to six months at home and at a day-care centre. Their babbled utterances were transcribed phonetically and categorized according to consonant-type and vowel-type. Contexts for each utterance were also categorized, primarily according to the infant's simultaneous action. A quantitative analysis of co-occurrences between phonetic and contextual categories determined that across infants between 14 and 40% of utterances recurred in particular contexts with a greater than expected frequency. These findings support Halliday's (1975a) notion that babbling is not entirely random but contains consistent sound-meaning relations that are not adult-modelled. They also extend the notions of continuity between prelinguistic and linguistic stages of development to the semantic domain.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A portion of these data was presented at the Biennial Conference on Child Development, University of Waterloo, on 9 May 1980. The research was supported in part by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada and from the Faculty of Arts of York University. The authors would like to acknowledge the painstaking work of Shirley Messer and Diane Massum in phonetically transcribing the tapes, as well as the assistance of Sheilah McConnell, Milan Tytla, Allen Walton, Elsa Chan, Wendy Austin and Georgia Quartaro at various stages of the project. We thank Professor Michael Friendly for his statistical advice. We are also indebted to the staff of the York University Day Care Center and to the parents of the participating infants for allowing our intrusions.

References

Bates, E. (1976) Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1979) The emergence of symbols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1977) From gesture to the first word: on cognitive and social prerequisites. In Lewis, M. and Rosenblum, L. (eds), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Sagart, L. & Bacri, N. (1981) Phonetic analysis of late babbling: a case study of a French child. Journal of Child Language 8. 511–24.Google Scholar
Carter, A. L. (1974) The development of communication in the sensorimotor period: a case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Carter, A. L. (1975) The transformation of sensorimotor morphemes into words: a case study of the development of ‘more’ and ‘mine’. Journal of Child Language 2. 233–50.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L. (1984) Category formation in vervet monkeys. In Harré, R. & Reynolds, V. (eds), The meaning of primate signals. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978) From gesture to word: on the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. and Carton, A. (eds). Human growth and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingwall, W. O. (1975) The species-specificity of speech. In Dato, D. P. (ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics: theory and applications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1973) The development of speech acts. Dissertation Abstracts International 33. 6892–A. (University Microfilms No. 73–14, 374.)Google Scholar
Dore, J., Franklin, M. B., Miller, R. T. & Ramer, A. L. H. (1976) Transitional phenomena in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 3. 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1973) Editor's Note. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976) Learning to pronounce: the earliest stages of phonological development in the child. Paper presented at the conference on the Early Behavioral Assessment of the Communicative and Cognitive Abilities of the Developmentally Disabled, Orcas Island.Google Scholar
Freedle, R. & Lewis, M. (1977) Prelinguistic conversations. In Lewis, M. and Rosenblum, L. (eds), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gouzoules, H., Gouzoules, S. & Marler, P. (1985) External reference and affective signaling in mammalian vocal communication. In Zivin, G. (ed.), The development of expressive behavior: biology-environment interactions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976) The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) A sociosemiotic perspective on language development. Paper presented at the Fifth Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975 a) Learning how to mean – explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975 b) Learning how to mean. In Lenneberg, E. and Lenneberg, E. (eds), Foundations of language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941/1968) Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. M. & Bolstad, O. P. (1973) Methodological issues in naturalistic observations: some problems and solutions for field research. In Hamerlynck, L. A., Handy, L. C. and Marsh, E. J. (eds), Behavior change: methodological concepts and practice. Champagne IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. (1977) Toward the origin of dialogue. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Bauer, H. R. (1985) Vocalizations of one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 12. 491526.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (1980) The guided reinvention of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983) Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McShane, J. (1980) Learning to talk. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. & Johnson, M. K. (1975) Communication and cognitive organization in humans and other animals. Paper presented at New York Academy of Sciences' Conference on Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973) Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38. No. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K., Wieman, L. A., Doyle, W. J. & Ross, C. (1976) Infant babbling and speech. Journal of Child Language 3. 111.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1945/1951) Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. (Trans, by Gattegno, C. & Hodgson, F. M.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Plooij, F. X. (1978) Some basic traits of language in wild chimpanzees. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sander, L. W. (1977) The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In Lewis, M. and Rosenblum, L. A. (eds), Interaction, conversation and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1976) Conversations with a one-year-old: a case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Hawaii: The University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. (1984) What the vocalizations of monkeys mean to humans and what they mean to the monkeys themselves. In Harré, R. & Reynolds, V. (eds), The meaning of primate signals. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Siegel, L. S. (1981) Infant tests as predictors of cognitive and language development at two years. Child Development 52. 545–57.Google Scholar
Stark, R. E. (1981) Infant vocalization: a comprehensive view. Infant Mental Health Journal 2. 118–28.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984) Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language II. 247–71.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1978) Purpose in a world of chance. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1977) Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Velten, H. V. (1943) The growth of phonemic and lexical patterns in infant language. Language 19. 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H. & Miller, J. (1985) From babbling to speech: a reassessment of the continuity issue. Language 61. 397445.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963) Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar