Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T19:15:44.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helping Children Adjust—a Tri-Ministry Study: II. Evaluation Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Michael H. Boyle
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
Charles E. Cunningham
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
JoAnn Heale
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
Joel Hundert
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
Jan McDonald
Affiliation:
Halton Board of Education, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
David R. Offord
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
Yvonne Racine
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, Canada
Get access

Abstract

This report describes the evaluation methodology of the Tri-Ministry Study—a school-based trial evaluating the effectiveness of three universal programs: (a) a classwide social skills program (SS), (b) a partner reading program (RE); and, (c) a combination of both (SS & RE), to reduce and prevent behavioural maladjustment among children in the primary division (up to grade 3) of Ontario schools. The trial was done between 1991 and 1995. Sixty schools in 11 boards of education took part and were assigned randomly to program(s) during the study. Contributing to the evaluation database are detailed follow-up assessments (observations, ratings, and standard tests) on 2439 children. Three-level growth trajectory models are used to evaluate program effects. The analysis presented for illustration in this report focuses on reading achievement measured by the Wide Range Achievement Test. A companion paper presents the results of the study and discusses important methodological and programmatic issues applicable to this and other prevention studies in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)