Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T21:44:09.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

210. Studies in mastitis. II. A comparison of methods for the detection of subclinical mastitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. G. Davis  and
J. McClemont
J. G. Davis
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
J. McClemont
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many tests have been used for the detection of subclinical mastitis and these have been enumerated by Munch-Petersen(1) and Rosell(2). In view of the continued recommendation and use of these tests in many countries it was felt desirable to make a careful assessment of their value.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1939 , pp. 74 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Munch-Petersen, (1938). “Bovine mastitis”. Imp. Bur. Anim. Hlth Rev. Ser. no. 1.Google Scholar
(2)Rosell, (1933) “La mammite streptococcique de la vache”. Quebec: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
(3)Minett, (1937). J. comp. Path. 50, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Davis, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 121.Google Scholar
(5)Plastridge, et al. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 583.Google Scholar
(6)Rowland, & Zein-El-Dine, (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 174.Google Scholar
(7)Rowland, & Zein-El-Dine, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 108.Google Scholar