Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T10:43:41.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

235. The enrichment of aerogenes-cloacae types in milk held at low temperatures: with observations on the relative rates of growth of aerogenes-cloacae and b. coli types in milk at different temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

James F. Malcolm
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Glasgow

Extract

1. Seventy-five pure cultures of various types of coliform bacteria were grown in sterilized or partially sterilized milk for 24 hr. at 17° C. The cultures of B. aerogenes, B. oxytocus and B. cloacae types as a rule multiplied much more rapidly than those of the B. coli types. Similar results were obtained when twenty-nine cultures of various coliform types were grown in raw milk for 24 hr. at 17° C. There was generally little or no tendency to clumping of the organisms in the milk, even after 3 days' incubation at 17° C.

2. Forty mixed cultures, each consisting of an aerogenes-cloacae type and a B. coli, were grown in milk for 24 hr. at 17° C. In thirty-four instances the aerogenes-cloacae type multiplied more rapidly than the B. coli.

3. Twenty-one of these mixed cultures were also grown in milk for 24 hr. at 22, 30 and 37° C. At 22, as at 17° C, the aerogenes-cloacae type multiplied as a rule more rapidly than the B. coli, while at 30 and 37°C. the reverse was the case.

4. Twelve specimens of bovine faeces were inoculated into raw milk and the cultures kept at 17° C. for 36 hr. Aerogenes-cloacae types occurring in the faeces became enriched in the milk, the coliform flora of the milk at the end of the incubation period frequently consisting chiefly of these types.

5. The greater incidence of aerogenes-cloacae types in summer milk in Scotland as compared with winter milk, found in a previous investigation, may be explained by the fact that when milk is contaminated directly or indirectly with faeces, these types become enriched at the temperatures of holding commonly employed in summer. Such enrichment does not occur in winter, the holding temperature of the milk being as a rule so low that there is little or no proliferation of any coliform types. Consequently, the relative proportions of the various coliform types in winter milk tend to remain similar to those in the faeces.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Malcolm, J. F. (1933). J. Dairy Res. 5, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Muir, R. & Ritchie, J. (1937). Manual of Bacteriology. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
(3) Malcolm, J. F. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 383.Google Scholar
(4) Wilsok, G. S. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun. Lond., no. 206.Google Scholar
(5) Brown, H. C. & Ktbwan, E.W. O'G. (1915). Ind. J. med. Res. 2, 763.Google Scholar
(6) Malcolm, J. F. (1932). J. Dairy Res. 4, 91.Google Scholar
(7) Breed, R. S. & Stocking, W. A. Jr. (1920). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 75.Google Scholar
(8) Malcolm, J. F. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 395.Google Scholar
(9) Houston, A. C. (18971903). Ann. Rep. Med. Off. Loc. Gov. Bd.Google Scholar
(10) Burke-Gaitney, H.J.O'D. (1932). J. Hyg., Camb., 32, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Bardsley, D. A. (1934). J. Hyg., Camb., 34, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Rogers, L. A., Clark, W. M. & Lubs, H. A. (1918). J. Bact. 3, 231.Google Scholar
(13) Hammer, B. W. (1928). Dairy Bacteriology. New York and London. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
(14) Ayers, S. H. & Clemmer, P. W. (1918). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 739.Google Scholar
(15) Finkelstedt, R. (1919). J. Dairy Sci. 2, 460.Google Scholar
(16) Clemesha, W. W. (1912). Bacteriology of Surface Waters in the Tropics. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Rogers, L. A. (1918). J. Boat. 3, 313.Google Scholar
(18) Winslow, C.-E.A. & Cohen, B. (1918). J. infect. Dis. 23, 82.Google Scholar
(19) Gray, J.D.A. (1932). J. Hyg., Camb., 32, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Burke-Gaffney, H.J.O'D. (1933). J. Hyg., Camb., 33, 510.Google Scholar
(21) Platt, A. E. (1935). J. Hyg., Camb., 35, 437.Google Scholar