Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T00:55:32.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

265. On the use of various sera for the determination of the soluble calcium and phosphorus of milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. T. Pyne
G. T. Pyne
Affiliation:
Dairy Chemistry Department, University College, Cork
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A comparison of the value of various milk sera for the determination of the soluble phosphate and calcium of milk, using dialysis at 0–5° C. as a standard method, gave the following results:

(i) Rennet whey was the most satisfactory; with fresh milk it yields fairly accurate values for calcium, slightly low (average 5 %) for phosphate. With increasing acidity of the milk both sets of values tend to rise somewhat relatively to those of the dialysate, phosphate approaching the true value and calcium rising slightly above it.

(ii) Mercuric chloride borax serum gives high results for the soluble phosphate of fresh milk With increasing acidity of the milk, the results fall steadily.

(iii) Papain whey gives somewhat low results for both the phosphate and calcium of raw and pasteurized milk, with the same tendency as rennet whey to yield higher and improved results as the acidity of the milk: increases. With boiled milk it gives abnormally high results for both constituents. The additional phosphate and calcium appear to arise from the solution of colloidal calcium phosphate.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1940 , pp. 292 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) György, (1923). Biochem. Z. 142, 1.Google Scholar
(2) Kometiani, (1931). Milchw. Forsch. 12, 433.Google Scholar
(3) Kuttner, & Liechtenstein, (1930). J. biol. Chem. 86, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Lampitt, & Bushill, . (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Lang, & Miethke, (1932). Milchw. Forsch. 14, 195.Google Scholar
(6) Lenstrup, (1926). J. biol. Chem. 70, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Ling, (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Michaelis, & Rona, (1909). Biochem. Z. 21, 114.Google Scholar
(9) Miethke, & Levecke, (1932). Milchw. Forsch. 13, 535.Google Scholar
(10) Pyne, (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Pyne, (1935). Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. N.S. 24, 223.Google Scholar