Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:31:29.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

434. The bacteriological quality of National Dried Milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. T. Parsons  and
J. R. Fraser
A. T. Parsons
Affiliation:
Government Chemist's Department, London
J. R. Fraser
Affiliation:
Government Chemist's Department, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper presents in statistical form the results of the bacteriological examination of over 1200 samples of National Dried Milk during the period 1944–9. Factors which may affect the results are discussed. The general level of bacterial quality disclosed is high, but appreciable differences are shown in the standards reached at different factories and repacking depots. No general trend with time was observed in the figures throughout the period of 6 years considered, and no correlation was observed between the counts obtained and the time which had elapsed since packing into 20 oz. tins. Between counts at 37 and at 55° C. some correlation was noted in the products of most factories and depots, and the significance of this observation is discussed. The counts obtained are compared with various standards which have been put forward or are now in operation, and ways are suggested in which the figures might be used to set up standards of bacterial quality for roller-dried milk powder in this country.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1951 , pp. 34 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Allen, L. A.Bull. Hannah Dairy Inst. no. 3.Google Scholar
(2)Higginbottom, C. (1943). J. Dairy Res. 13, 308.Google Scholar
(3)Nichols, A. A. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 231.Google Scholar
(4) The grading of dry whole milk and sanitary and quality standards. Bull. Amer. Dry Milk Inst. no. 913.Google Scholar
(5)Higginbottom, C. (1943). J. Dairy Res. 13, 324.Google Scholar
(6)Hiscox, E. R. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Bacteriological Tests for Graded Milk. Ministry of Health, Memo 139/Foods Jan. 1937.Google Scholar
(8)Ministry Of Health. Rep. publ. Hlth med. Subj., Lond., no. 71.Google Scholar
(9)Robertson, A. H. & Frayer, J. M. (1930). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. nos. 314–18.Google Scholar
(10)Mattick, A. T. R., McClemont, J. & Irwin, J. O. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 150.Google Scholar
(11)Steiner, E. H. (1949). Analyst, 74, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar