Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T15:19:48.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

129. The Chlorine Content of Milk as an Indication of Mastitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. W. Blood  and
A. Rowlands
J. W. Blood
Affiliation:
Midland Agricultural College, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
A. Rowlands
Affiliation:
Midland Agricultural College, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The importance of a rapid and simple test for the diagnosis of mastitis in cows is a question which has attracted considerable attention on the part of many workers. One such test based on the determination of chlorine in milk by a rapid method has been advocated recently by Rosell.

2. The authors of this paper have made a careful examination of this method and compared the results obtained on samples of milk with those given by other methods known to yield reliable and reasonably accurate results.

3. The direct titration of chlorine in milk with silver nitrate solution, without the removal of proteins, invariably gives high results, and, moreover, a satisfactory end-point is difficult to obtain.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1936 , pp. 47 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Minett, F. C., Stableforth, A. W. and Edwards, S. J. (1933). J. camp. Path. 46, 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Plastridge, W. N., Anderson, E. O., White, G. C. and Rettger, L. F. (1934). Bull. Storrs agric. Exp. Sta. No. 197.Google Scholar
(3) Minett, F. C., Stableforth, A. W. and Edwabds, S. J. (1930). J. comp. Path. 43, 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Edwards, S. J. (1933). J. comp. Path. 46, 211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Rosell, J. M. (1933). Oka. Agr. Inst. and Vet. Coll. Res. Contribution, No. 40.Google Scholar
(6) Rosell, J. M. (1934). Sci. Agric. 15, 169–75.Google Scholar
(7) Richmond, H. D. (1909). Analyst, 34, 208–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Hammer, B. W. and Bailey, D. E. (1917). Res. Bull. Ia agric. Exp. Sta. No. 41, pp. 337–48.Google Scholar
(9) Sharpe, P. F. and Struble, E. B. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 527–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Poetschke, P. (1910). J. industr. engng Chem. 2, 210–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Poetschke, P. (1912). J. industr. engng Chem. 4, 38–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) van der Berg, B. and Koppejan, C. A. (1924). Le Lait, 4, 81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Hucker, G. J. (1933). Bull. N.Y. agric. Exp. Sta. No. 626.Google Scholar
(14) Austin, and van Slyke, (1920). J. biol. Chem. 41, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Davies, W. L. (1932). Analyst, 37, 71–84.Google Scholar
(16) Minett, F. C., Stableforth, A. W. and Edwards, S. J. (1930). J. comp. Path. 42, 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Leitch, R. H. (1935). Buli. W. Scot, agric. Coll. No. 130, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar