Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T20:21:42.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

497. An improved medium for lactobacilli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Mary Briggs
Mary Briggs
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several media previously recommended for lactobacilli by other workers have been examined, but none was found to support good growth of all species. Experiments are described in which the optimum concentrations and combinations of various ingredients, particularly Tween 80, were determined. These resulted in the development of a practical medium which has proved satisfactory for the growth of all varieties of lactobacilli.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1953 , pp. 36 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Davis, J. G. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Kulp, W. L. (1927). Science. 66, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Weiss, J. E. & Rettger, L. F. (1933). J. Bact. 28, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Valley, G. & Herter, R. C. (1935). Science, 82, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Nymon, M. C. & Gortnor, W. A. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 163, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Orla-Jensen, S. (1942). The Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2nd Ed.Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
(7)Roberts, E. C. & Snell, E. E. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 163, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Davis, J. G. (1936). Proc. Soc. agric. Bact., Notes on the preparation of media.Google Scholar
(9)Brown, J. H. & Howe, P. E. (1922). J. Bact. 7, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Hunter, G. J. E. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Kodicek, E. & Wobden, A. N. (1945). Biochem. J. 39, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Kodicek, E. & Wobden, A. N. (1946). Nature, Lond., 157, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Sherman, J. M. & Albus, W. R. (1922). Abst. Bact. 6, 17.Google Scholar
(14)Hunter, C. A. (1924). Abst. Bact. 8, 3.Google Scholar
(15)Hutchings, B. L. & Boggiano, E. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 169, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Whitehill, A. R., Oleson, J. J. & SubbaRow, Y. (1947). Arch. Biochem. 15, 31.Google Scholar
(17)Tomarelli, R. M., Norris, R. F., Gyorgy, P., Hassinen, J. B. & Bernhart, F. W. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 181, 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Williams, V. R. & Fieger, E. A. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 170, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Williams, W. L., Broquist, H. P. & Snell, E. E. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 170, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Kitay, E. & Snell, E. E. (1950). J. Bact. 60, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Rogosa, M. & Mitchell, J. A. (1950). J. Bact. 59, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Davis, B. D. & Dubos, R. J. (1947). J. exp. Med. 86, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Williams, V. R. & Fieger, E. A. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 177, 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Ley, H. L. & Mueller, J. H. (1946). J. Bact. 52, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Dubos, R. J. (1947). J. exp. Med. 85, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar