Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T09:30:12.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

591. The outdoor rearing of calves on grass with special reference to growth rate and grazing behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. H. B. Roy ,
K. W. G. Shillam  and
June Palmer
J. H. B. Roy
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
K. W. G. Shillam
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
June Palmer
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Five Dairy Shorthorn male calves born in February and March 1953 and three groups of four born in each of the months February, March and April 1954 were placed out of doors on permanent pasture at birth.

2. Each calf received 6 or 8 pt. colostrum followed by approximately 45 gal. whole milk during the first 8 weeks of life, and thereafter, except for a small amount of dried grass given in Exp. 1, pasture grass comprised the sole item of diet until 6 months of age.

3. Mean growth rates for each month of life and from birth to 6 months are presented. After the first month of life, good progress was made, and it is considered that the live weights at 6 months of age are similar to those obtained with conventional methods of rearing.

4. There was a significant effect of birth weight on live-weight gain. After adjustment for birth weight, there were no significant differences in live-weight gain between February, March and April-born groups of calves.

5. Weather conditions seemed to have little effect on the incidence of scouring during the first 3 weeks of life.

6. On leys, greater weight gains were obtained than on permanent pasture.

7. No lungworm larvae were detected in faeces samples examined. In many cases there was a high level of infestation with stomach and intestinal worms as indicated by the number of trichostrongyle eggs/g. faeces. Some aspects of this infestation are discussed.

8. Satisfactory growth to 18 months of age was obtained with silage during the 6-month winter period and at grass during the following spring and summer.

9. Details of behaviour of the five calves in Exp. 1 studied at approximately monthly intervals to 6 months of age are presented.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 1955 , pp. 252 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ann, . Rep., N.Z. Dep. Agric. (1951–1952), p. 18.Google Scholar
(2)A report on dairying conditions in New Zealand and Australia (1953), submitted to the Milk Marketing Board by a delegation of the Board, p. 38.Google Scholar
(3)Ann, . Rep., Anim. Res. Div. N.Z. Dep. Agric. (1952–1953), p. 15.Google Scholar
(4)McMeekan, C. P. (1954). N.Z. J. Agric. 88, 306.Google Scholar
(5)McMeekan, C. P. (1954). N.Z. J. Agric. 88, 481.Google Scholar
(6)Aschaffenburg, R., Bartlett, S., Kon, S. K., Roy, J. H. B., Sears, H. J., Thompson, S. Y., Ingram, P. L., Lovell, R. & Wood, P. C. (1953). Brit. J. Nutr. 7, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Yates, F. (1933). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 1, 129.Google Scholar
(8)Bartlett, S. & Jameson, J. L. (1932). J. Dairy Res. 3, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Roy, J. H. B. & Shillam, K. W. G. (1954). Unpublished work.Google Scholar
(10)Anonymous (1954). Milk. Short. J. 35, 26.Google Scholar
(11)Davis, L. R., Autrey, K. M., Herlich, H. & Hawkins, G. E. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Erb, R. E. & Murdock, F. R. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 503.Google Scholar
(13)Vasilets, Y. E. & Goluskho, V. E. (1951). Veterinariya, 28, 32 (Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 22, 271).Google Scholar
(14)Murley, W. R., Culvahouse, E. W. & Waugh, R. K. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 656.Google Scholar
(15)Nat. Med. Vet. Ass. (1945). Publication no. 8, p. 10.Google Scholar
(16)Phillips, R. (1950). Brit. vet. J. 106, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Burton, H. & Castle, M. E. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 229.Google Scholar
(18)Hancock, J. (1950). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 18, 249.Google Scholar
(19)Hancock, J. (1953). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21, 1.Google Scholar
(20)McArthur, A. T. G. (1951). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 11, 87.Google Scholar
(21)Corbett, J. L. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Hughes, G. P. & Reid, D. (1951). J. agric. Sci. 41, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Tayler, J. C. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Waite, R., MacDonald, W. B. & Holmes, W. (1951). J. agric. Sci. 41, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Johnstone Wallace, D. B. & Kennedy, K. (1944). J. agric. Sci. 34, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Castle, M. E., Foot, A. S. & Halley, R. J. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Brownlee, A. (1950). Bull. Anim. Behav. no. 8.Google Scholar