Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T11:16:40.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

596. Steam distillation of taints from cream: I. Theoretical considerations and properties of the reference substances, diacetyl and acetoin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

F. H. McDowall
F. H. McDowall
Affiliation:
The Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rate of removal of a dissolved tainting substance from cream by steam-distillation treatment is dependent in part on the relative volatility (or boiling point) of the pure substance, in part on the temperature of steam distillation, and in part on the influence of water on the vapour pressure of the tainting substance in dilute solution (i.e. on the activity coefficient, γ).

The application of Raoult's law and Henry's law to the problem of removal of taints from cream is discussed. For the dilute solutions commonly encountered in cream Henry's law can be expected to apply.

The equilibrium relationships for diacetyl and acetoin used as reference substances in investigations on cream-deodorizing equipment have been determined. The equilibrium coefficient for diacetyl in water at concentrations up to 50 p.p.m. in the liquid, as measured by the continuous equilibrium vaporization method, is 39·3. With rise in concentration above 50 p.p.m. in the liquid the coefficient decreases. At 100 p.p.m. it is 32 and at 1000 p.p.m. it is 20. The coefficient for acetoin in water at all concentrations up to 1·2% in the liquid is constant at 1·29. The activity coefficient for diacetyl in concentrations up to 50 p.p.m. was found to be 26·4 and for acetoin at concentrations up to 1·2%, 5·4.

For diacetyl the solubility partition coefficient as between butterfat and water rises from 0·47 at 100° F. to 0·74 at 180° F. For acetoin the partition coefficient remains constant at 0·18–0·19 over this range of temperatures. Correspondingly diacetyl is removed equally easily from butterfat and from water, whereas acetoin steam-distils much more readily from butterfat than from water.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 1955 , pp. 311 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Macdonald, M. B. & Crawford, E. M. (1927). Circ. Tenn. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 14.Google Scholar
(2)McDowall, F. H. Unpublished results.Google Scholar
(3)McDowall, F. H. (1953). The Buttermaker's Manual. Wellington: New Zealand University Press.Google Scholar
(3a)McDowall, F. H. (1954). Aust. J. Dairy Tech. 9, 61, J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 7, 212.Google Scholar
(4)Virtanen, A. I. & Pulkki, L. (1928). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 50, 3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Scott, J. K. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 354–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Sidgwick, N. V. (1920). J. chem. Soc. 117, 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Stull, D. R. (1947). J. industr. Engng Chem. 39, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Forss, D. A. (1951). Aust. J. appl. Sci. 2, 396.Google Scholar
(9)McDowall, F. H. (1953). Proc. 13th Int. Dairy Congr. 3, 781.Google Scholar
(10)Efron, A. & Blom, R. H. (1947). J. phys. Chem. 51, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Langlykke, A. F. & Peterson, W. H. (1937). J. industr. Engng Chem. (Anal, ed.) 9, 166.Google Scholar
(12)Blom, R. H. & Efron, A, (1945). J. industr. Engng Chem. 37, 1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)McDowall, F. H. (1955). N.Z. J. sci. Tech. 37 B, 1.Google Scholar
(14)Heilbron, I. M. (1934). Dictionary of Organic Compounds, 3, 391. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
(15)Schmallfuss, H. & Rethorn, H. (1935). Z. Untersuch. Lebensmitt. 70, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Pien, J., Baisse, J. & Martin, R. (1937). Lait, 17, 673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Cox, G. A. & Wiley, W. J. (1939). J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust. 12, 227.Google Scholar
(18)Eggleton, P., Elsden, S. R. & Gough, N. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)McDowall, F. H. (1955). J. Dairy Res. (in the Press).Google Scholar