Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T05:25:20.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Citric acid concentration in subclinical mastitic milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Masaharu Oshima
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba Norindanchi P.O. Box 5, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Hiroshi Fuse
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba Norindanchi P.O. Box 5, Ibaraki 305, Japan

Summary

The effect of subclinical mastitis on the citric acid concentration of cow's milk was studied by comparing milk from the mastitic quarter with that from a healthy quarter of the same udder. Forty-two pairs of fore-milk from the morning milking of 17 cows were examined and the citric acid content was measured by an automated carboxylic acid analyzer. The citric acid concentration decreased in subclinical mastitic milk and the extent of decrease was proportional to the degree of mastitis as expressed by the quarter difference value in concentration of Na+Cl in mm/1, i.e. the increase in the Na and Cl concentrations in the abnormal milk over that found in normal milk from the same udder. The correlation coefficient between the quarter difference value of Na+Cl and the value for citric acid was –0·77, (d.f. = 46, P <0·001) and a linear regression equation was obtained. The result showed clearly that subclinical mastitis is one of the causes of variation in the citric acid content of cow's milk. The quantitative change in citric acid concentration in subclinical mastitic milk is discussed with reference to the admixture theory for the formation of abnormal milk.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barry, J. M. & Rowland, S. J. (1953). Biochemical Journal 54, 575578.Google Scholar
Kamal, T. H., Johnson, H. D. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 16551667.Google Scholar
Kasai, Y., Tanimura, T. & Tamura, Z. (1977). Analytical Chemistry 49, 655658.Google Scholar
Nakajima, M., Ozawa, Y., Tanimura, T. & Tamura, Z. (1976). Journal of Chromatography 123, 129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, M. (1977). Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 11, 239245.Google Scholar
Oshima, M. (1978). In Physiology of Mammary Glands P. 361. (Eds Yokoyama, A., Mizuno, H. and Nagasawa, H..) Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press.Google Scholar
Oshima, M. & Hodate, K. (1975). Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 46, 8186Google Scholar
Peaker, M. & Linzell, J. L. (1975). Nature 253, 464.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 430441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalm, O. W., Carroll, E. J. & Jain, N. C. (1971). Bovine Mastitis. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th Edn, P. 91. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Yusa, K., Ando, K. & Onodera, Y. (1969). Japanese Journal Of Zootechnical Science 40, 3236.Google Scholar