Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T04:36:45.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of different neutralizing treatments on the efficiency of an anaerobic digester fed with deproteinated cheese whey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Johannes De Haast
Affiliation:
Departments of Dairy Science, University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
Trevor J. Britz
Affiliation:
Departments of Dairy ScienceMicrobiology, University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
Johannes C. Novello
Affiliation:
Departments of Dairy Science, University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa

Summary

Deproteinated whey, prepared from sweet whey powder, was digested anaerobically in a downflow fixed-bed reactor at 35 °C. Different pH control treatments were applied over a period of 210 d. Initially NaOH was added at a concentration of 68 mequiv. l-1 substrate. This was successfully replaced by 80 mequiv. Na2CO3l-1 which resulted in a 15·5% increase in biogas production and a 6·7% increase in CH4 production. A decrease in the quantity of Na2C03l-1 added led to signs of instability and a drop in CH4 production. The stepwise addition of urea restored the stability, and a further increase of urea, to a level of about 20 mequiv. l-1, made it possible to replace Na2C03 completely. When all pH control measures were omitted, complete failure resulted within 10 d. Methane yields, under stable conditions, varied between 0·321 and 0·272 m3 kg-1 chemical oxygen demand (COD) removed which corresponds to 92 and 78% of the theoretical yields. Carbon balances indicated that between 60·8 and 68·5% of the carbon fed was converted to biogas. No toxicity was observed at a carbon: nitrogen (C/N) ratio of 7·7. This was in contrast to previous results where toxicity had occurred at the same C/N ratio but at a higher concentration of Na.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bull, M. A., Sterritt, R. M. & Lester, J. N. 1984 An evaluation of Single- and Separated-phase anaerobic industrial wastewater treatment in fluidized bed reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 26 10541065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brune, G., Schoberth, S. M. & Sahm, H. 1982 Anaerobic treatment of an industrial wastewater containing acetic acid, furfural and sulphite. Process Biochemistry 17 (3) 20–22, 24, 35Google Scholar
Callander, I. J. & Barford, J. P. 1983 Cheese whey anaerobic digestion – effect of chemical flocculant addition. Biotechnology Letters 5 153158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haast, J., Britz, T. J., Novello, J. C. & Lategan, P. M. 1983 Anaerobic digestion of cheese whey using a stationary fixed-bed reactor. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 18 261271Google Scholar
De Haast, J., Britz, T. J., Novello, J. C. & Verwey, E. W. 1985 Anaerobic digestion of deproteinated cheese whey. Journal of Dairy Research 52 457467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Torre, I. & Goma, G. 1981 Characterization of anaerobic microbial culture with high acidogenic activity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 23 185199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forday, W. & Greenfield, P. F. 1983 Anaerobic digestion. Effluent and Water Treatment Journal 23 405413Google Scholar
Georgacakis, D., Sievers, D. M. & Iannotti, E. L. 1982 Buffer stability in manure digesters. Agricultural Wastes 4 427441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, S. J., Wase, D. A. J. & Forster, C. F. 1982 Use of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor to treat acetate rich waste. Process Biochemistry 17 (4) 33–34, 45Google Scholar
Hickby, R. F. & Owens, R. W. 1981 Methane generation from high-strength industrial wastes with the anaerobic biological fluidized bed. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium 11 399413Google Scholar
Khan, A. W., Trottier, T. M., Patel, G. B. & Martin, S. M. 1979 Nutrient requirement for the degradation of cellulose to methane by a mixed population of anaerobes. Journal of General Microbiology 112 365372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, I. W. & Lettinga, G. 1984 The influence of ammonium-nitrogen on the specific activity of palletized methanogenic sludge. Agricultural Wastes 9 205216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeker, E. J., Schulte, D. D., Sparling, A. B. & Lapp, H. M. 1979 Anaerobic treatment process stability. Water Pollution Control Federation Journal 51 718727Google Scholar
Lettinga, G., Van Velsen, A. F. M., Hobma, S. W., De Zeeuw, W. & Klapwijk, A. 1980 Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 22 699734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mah, R. A. 1981 The methanogenic bacteria, their ecology and physiology. In Trends in the Biology of Fermentations for Fuels and Chemicals 357373 (Ed. Hollaender, A.) New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E. C. & Cheremisinoff, P. N. 1981 Biogas Production and Utilization. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sahm, H. 1984 Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology (Ed. Fiechter, A.). 29 83115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlottfeldt, G. A. 1979 Potential for anaerobic treatment of whey Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, USAGoogle Scholar
Switzenbaum, M. S. & Danskin, S. C. 1982 Anaerobic expanded bed treatment of whey. Agricultural Wastes 4 411426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeikus, J. G. 1980 Microbial populations in digesters. In Anaerobic Digestion 6189 (Eds Stafford, D. A., Wheatley, B. I. and Hughes, D. E.) London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd (International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion 1 Cardiff 1979)Google Scholar
Zoetemeyer, R. J., Matthijsen, A. J. C. M., Van Den Heuvel, J. C., Cohen, A. & Belhouwer, C. 1982 Anaerobic acidification of glucose in an upflow reactor. Biomass 2 187199CrossRefGoogle Scholar