Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:50:02.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the concentration of vitamins in milk: I. Effect of breed, season and geographical location on fat-soluble vitamins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

S. Y. Thompson ,
Kathleen M. Henry  and
S. K. Kon
S. Y. Thompson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Kathleen M. Henry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two surveys were done, one in 1943–44 and one in 1958–60, of the seasonal variation in the concentration of vitamin A and carotene in milk fat from 13 different areas in Great Britain. In the 1958–60 survey α-tocopherol and vitamin D were also measured. The main purpose of the second survey was to find out if the marked swing from Shorthorns to Friesians, and the trend towards greater use of carotene-rich foods in winter feeds that occurred in the intervening 15 years, had affected the pattern of vitamin A activity. In addition, monthly samples of butter were obtained in 1958–59 from a single factory in New Zealand during a complete butter-making season (9 months) and were assayed for vitamin A, carotene, α-tocopherol and vitamin D. Three experiments were done to study the effect of breed on the vitamin A and carotene content of milk fat, and in one of them α-tocopherol and vitamin D were also determined.

The seasonal trends for vitamin A and carotene were essentially the same in both surveys. A peak occurred in May after the spring flush of grass and was followed by a decline with a second peak in the autumn, except in 1959 when both the summer and autumn were very dry. Potencies were higher in the south than in the north, where the differences between summer and winter were more marked. In winter, mean vitamin A potencies of 5·8 and 7·7 μg/g fat were found for northern and southern areas, respectively; the corresponding values for β-carotene were 2·0 and 4·5 μg/g fat. Mean summer values were 8·8 and 9·7 μg/g fat for vitamin A and 5·1 and 6·5 μg/g fat for carotene, equivalent to increases of about 52 and 26% and about 155 and 44%, respectively, over winter values. Differences in mean potency between areas are explained by length of grazing season and type of winter feed.

The concentration of vitamin A in the fat was essentially the same for Ayrshires, Friesians, Jerseys and Shorthorns but somewhat lower for Guernseys; that of carotene was higher for the Channel Island breeds, particularly Guernseys, than for the other breeds studied.

Compared with this country, concentrations of carotene were higher and of vitamin A lower in milk fat from New Zealand, probably because of the predominance of Jersey cows in New Zealand herds. The seasonal trends for these vitamins were similar in both countries, but the spring peaks were earlier, the autumn peaks later and the summer declines more pronounced in New Zealand than in this country.

Concentrations of α-tocopherol in British milk fat showed a trend similar to that found for both vitamin A and carotene and were again influenced by feeding practices. Mean values of 23 and 29 μg α-tocopherol/g fat were found in the summer for northern and southern areas, respectively; the corresponding winter values were 15 and 23 μg/g fat. Mean values of about 30 μg/g fat were found, over a 28-month period, for the milk fat of each of the 3 breeds, Ayrshire, Friesian and Jersey. No seasonal trend was observed in the New Zealand samples; the mean value for the 9 months was 32 μg/g fat (range 24–39 μg).

Vitamin D potencies were higher in summer, when there is more sunshine, than in winter. The higher summer values in the northern than in the southern part of the country may have been related to a higher intake of vitamin D in the former from hay and pasture. Summer potencies of 0·44, 0·53 and 0·62 i.u. vitamin D/g fat, respectively, were found for Friesian, Jersey and Ayrshire milk; corresponding winter values were 0·06, 0·08 and 0·9 i.u./g fat. For the New Zealand butters, summerues values were higher than in this country, about 0·7 compared with about 0·4 i.u./g fat; winter values were similar in both countries.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, J. T. (1952). Vet. Rec. 64, 151, 174.Google Scholar
Analytical Methods Committee (1959). Analyst, 84, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, C., Mahon, A. C. & Chapman, R. A. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbel, D. (1961). Progress in Photobiology: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Photobiology, Copenhagen, 1960, p. 92 (eds., Christensen, B.C. & Buckmann, B.). Amsteidam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Baumann, C. A., Steenbock, H., Beeson, W. M. & Rupel, I. W. (1934). J. biol. Chem. 105, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, H. E. & Hoppert, C. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 11, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Brown, F. & MacDonald, A. M. (1953). Brit. J. Nutr. 7, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, R. G., Kon, S. K., Dann, W. J. & Moore, T. (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budowski, P., Ascarelli, I., Gross, J. & Nir, I. (1963). Science, 142, 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, J. E., Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K. & Mackintosh, J. (1937). Biochem. J. 31, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, K. H. (1938). Biological Standardisation of the Vitamins, p. 223. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Crane, F. L., Lester, R. L., Widmer, C. & Hatefi, Y. (1959). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 32, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, A. S. (1961). J. R. agric. Soc. 122, 187.Google Scholar
Fridericia, L. S. (1947). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 5, 255.Google Scholar
Garrett, O. F. & Bosshardt, D. K. (1944). Bull. N.J. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 710.Google Scholar
Gillam, A. E. & Heilbron, I. M. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillam, A. E., Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1937). Milk and Nutrition, part 1, p. 45. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Gillam, A. E. & Kon, S. K. (1940). J. Dairy Res. 11, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Great Britain, Parliament (1958). Report of the Committee on Grassland Utilisation (Cmnd. 547.) London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Greene, R., Farran, H. & Glascock, R. F. (1958). J. Endocrin. 17, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Gillam, A. E. & White, P. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Thompson, S. Y., McCallum, J. W. & Stewart, J. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Thompson, S. Y. (1954). Milchwissenschaft, 9, 14.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Peterson, W. H. & Steenbock, H. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, S. K., Mawson, E. H. & Thompson, S. Y. (1944). Nature, Lond., 154, 84.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K. & Thompson, S. Y. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruisheer, C. I. (1956). 14th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 202.Google Scholar
Kruisheer, C. I. & Den Herder, P. C. (1953). 13th Int. Dairy Congr. 3, 1354.Google Scholar
Krukovsky, V. N., Trimberger, G. W., Turk, K. L., Loosli, J. K. & Henderson, C. R. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krukovsky, V. N., Whiting, F. & Loosli, J. K. (1950). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, J. W. (1945). Biochem. J. 39, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowall, F. H. & McGillivray, W. A. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, A. K. R. & McDowall, F. H. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1956). N.Z. J. Sci. 38A, 466.Google Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. & Worker, N. A. (1958). N.Z. J. agric. Res. 1, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattick, A. T. R. (1937). Bull. Min. Agric. Fish. Fd, no. 31. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1960/1961). Report of the Production. Thames Ditton: Milk Marketing Board.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1962). Dairy Facts and Figures. Thames: MUk Marketing Board.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture And Fisheries (1947). Agric. Statist., Lond., Part I.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1960). Agric. Statist., Lond.Google Scholar
Moon, F. E. (1939). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 7, 235.Google Scholar
Morton, R. A., Lord, J. W. & Goodwin, T. W. (1941). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond. 60, 310.Google Scholar
New Zealand Department Of Agriculture (1952). Primary Production in New Zealand, p. 50.Google Scholar
Olson, F. R., Hegsted, D. M. & Peterson, W. H. (1939). J. Dairy Sci. 22, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, L. S. & Eckles, C. H. (1914). J. biol. Chem. 17, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, W. H., Bohstedt, G., Bird, H. H. & Beeson, W. M. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platon, B. & Swartling, P. (1944). Medd. Mejeriförs. Alnarp, no. 12.Google Scholar
Quackenbush, F. W., Steenbock, H. & Peterson, W. H. (1938). J. Amer. chem. Soc. 60, 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technical Committee In Charge Of The Nation-Wide Survey (1947). Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 636.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 3, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. Y. (1959). 15th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 247.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J. & Kon, S. K. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J., Mawson, E. H. & Kon, S. K. (1949). 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 238.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y. & Kon, S. K. (1950). Proc. 8th Int. Congr. agric. Industr. 2, 55.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y. & Kon, S. K. (1964). J. Dairy Res. 31, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimberger, G. W., Kennedy, W. K., Turk, K. L., Loosli, J. K., Reid, J. T. & Slack, S. T. (1955). Bull. Cornell agric. Exp. Sta. no. 910.Google Scholar
Wallis, G. C. (1944). J. Dairy Sci. 27, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, H. (1939). Analyst, 64, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, L. & Petracek, F. J. (1956). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 61, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar