Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T06:17:41.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and properties of rennets from lamb's and kid's abomasa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Emmanuel Anifantakis
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Margaret L. Green
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT

Summary

Lamb and kid rennets were prepared by extraction of dried abomasa with 6% (w/v) NaCl-2% (w/v) H3BO3 and activation of the proenzymes at pH 2·0. Each gave one zone of precipitation on casein-agar gel diffusion, enabling them to be differentiated from calf rennet and pig pepsin. After agarose gel electrophoresis, the proteinase activity of lamb rennet occurred in chymosin and pepsin bands only, whereas kid rennet contained an additional proteinase of intermediate mobility. Relative to their milk-clotting activities, lamb and kid rennets contained less pepsin and were less proteolytic on both haemoglobin at pH 1·8 and casein at pH 5·3 than calf rennet. The milk-clotting activities of lamb and kid rennets increased less with decrease in pH and were more stable to storage at both the pH value of maximum stability and lower pH values than that of calf rennet. Neither cathepsin activity nor lipolytic activity on milk fat was detected in any of the 3 rennets, but lamb rennet caused slight hydrolysis of tributyrin.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berridge, N. J. (1945). Biochemical Journal 39, 179186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, N. J. (1952). Analyst 77, 5762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, N. J. (1955). Methods in Enzymology 2, 6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, J. & Scott Blair, G. W. (1963). Dairy Industries 28, 220223.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, G. C. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 439446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1968). FAO Meeting Report A.N. 1968/3.Google Scholar
Fryer, T. F., Lawrence, R. C. & Reiter, B. (1967). Journal of Dairy Science 50, 477484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. L. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 261273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. L. & Stackpoole, A. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 297312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herian, K. & Krčál, Z. (1971). Průmysl Potravin 22, 137–139 (Dairy Science Abstracts 33, 821).Google Scholar
Herriott, R. M. (1955). Methods in Enzymology 2, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, H. L. (1944). U.S.A. patent no 2339931.Google Scholar
Mickelsen, E. & Eknstrom, C. A. (1972). Journal of Dairy Science 55, 294297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naudts, M. (1969). Annual Bulletin, International Dairy Federation (7), 124.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. H., Jensen, R. G. & Pitas, R. E. (1977). Journal of Dairy Science 60, 327362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 13731376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. H. & Chaudhari, R. V. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 13671372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothe, G. A. L., Harboe, M. K. & Martiny, S. C. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 7377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valles, E. & Mocquot, G. (1972). Lait 52, 259282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar