Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:13:57.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sterilizing effect against Bacillus subtilis spores of hydrogen peroxide at different temperatures and concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

P. Swartling  and
B. Lindgren
P. Swartling
Affiliation:
Food Research Institute, Alnarp, Sweden
B. Lindgren
Affiliation:
Food Research Institute, Alnarp, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An investigation was made of the death-rate of Bacillus subtilis spores in suspension in hydrogen peroxide concentrations of 10, 15 and 20% at 25, 50, 60, 70 and 80°C. Average logarithmic survival curves were plotted against normal time and death-rate constants and Q10 values were calculated from the graphically determined decimal reduction times. This treatment of the experimental findings was found to be warranted in the temperature range 60–80°C. The first-order death-rate constant was ∽ 0·1 s−1 for 10% hydrogen peroxide solution at 60°C and the Q10 was about 1·6. Increases in the concentration from 10 to 15% and from 15 to 20% each gave an increase of about 50% in the rate constant. The application of these data to commercial practice is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , October 1968 , pp. 423 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Curran, H. R., Evans, F. R. & Leviton, A. (1940). J. Bact. 40, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernelius, A. L., Wilkes, Ch. E., De armon jr, I. A. & Lincoln, R. E. (1958). J. Bact. 75, 300.Google Scholar
Grinsted, E. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 178.Google Scholar
Halvorson, H. O. (1957). J. appl. Bact. 20, 305.Google Scholar
Humphrey, A. E. & Nickerson, J. T. R. (1961). Appl. Microbiol. 9, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynell, G. G. & Meynell, E. (1965). Theory and Practice in Experimental Bacteriology, pp. 78–85. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. & Rettger, L. (1930). J. Bact. 20, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotman, Y. & Fields, M. L. (1966). J. Fd Sci. 31, 437.Google Scholar
Schnell, J. & Ernst, R. R. (1962). Appl. Microbiol. 10, 452.Google Scholar
Swartling, P. & Lindgren, B. (1962). Rep. Milk Dairy Res. Alnarp, no. 66.Google Scholar
Wang, D. I. C., Sharer, J. & Humphrey, A. E. (1964). Appl. Microbiol. 12, 451.Google Scholar