Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:42:10.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of dry cow antibiotic with and without an internal teat sealant on udder health during the first 100 d of lactation: a field study with matched pairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2012

Katja Mütze ,
Wilfried Wolter ,
Klaus Failing ,
Bärbel Kloppert ,
Heinz Bernhardt  and
Michael Zschöck
Katja Mütze
Affiliation:
Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Department II (veterinary medicine), Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany Unit for Agricultural Systems Engineering, TU München, Am Staudengarten 2, D-85354 Freising, Germany
Wilfried Wolter
Affiliation:
State Council, Schanzenfeldstrasse 8, D-35578 Wetzlar, Germany
Klaus Failing
Affiliation:
Unit for Biomathematics and Data Processing at the Veterinary Faculty of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Frankfurterstrasse 95, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
Bärbel Kloppert
Affiliation:
State Council, Schanzenfeldstrasse 8, D-35578 Wetzlar, Germany
Heinz Bernhardt
Affiliation:
Unit for Agricultural Systems Engineering, TU München, Am Staudengarten 2, D-85354 Freising, Germany
Michael Zschöck*
Affiliation:
Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor, Department II (veterinary medicine), Schubertstrasse 60, D-35392 Gießen, Germany
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: Peter-Michael.Zschoeck@lhl.hessen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this field study was to compare the udder health status as well as the clinical mastitis rate during the first 100 d of lactation in cows that received long-acting dry cow antibiotic alone (group AB) or in combination with an internal teat sealant (group AB + OS). The study was conducted during a 9-month period and included 136 Holstein cows from 12 dairy farms in Hessia, Germany. Between days 1 and 5 after calving a California mastitis test (CMT) was performed. Milk-samples were collected for bacteriological culture before drying off, between days 6 and 14 and days 35 and 56 of lactation. Additionally the cows were monitored for the occurrence of clinical mastitis events until 100 d post partum. Within the 12 herds cow-pairs were formed on the basis of age, milk yield and SCC. A cow-pair consisted of one cow from group AB and one cow from group AB + OS. For statistical analysis within every cow-pair one quarter that has been dried off with internal teat sealant and dry cow antibiotic (group AB + OS) was compared with one quarter that has been dried off with dry cow antibiotic (group AB) alone. As criterion for the matching process of udder quarters the cytobacteriological udder health status before drying off was used. A total of 544 quarters (136 cows) were used in this analysis. In the first 5 d after calving, group AB had significantly more quarters with a positive CMT reaction than group AB + OS (85 vs. 57; P <0·001), and in the first 100 d of lactation, group AB had more quarters with clinical mastitis than group AB + OS (25 vs. 15; P = 0·03). In the time periods 6–14 and 35–56 d of lactation, there were fewer quarters in group AB + OS populated with Corynebacterium spp. (days 6–14, P = 0·05; days 35–56, P = 0·02) and aesculin-positive streptococci (days 35–56, P = 0·02). The internal teat sealant was a promising tool for the prevention of new intramammary infections (IMI) of dry cows with environmental udder pathogens as expressed during early lactation.

Keywords

Dry cow treatmentteat sealantfield studymatched-pair statistical analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 477 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belke, L, Zschöck, M, Sobiraj, A, Wolter, W & Kloppert, B 2004 Investigations of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer for prevention of new intramammary bacterial infections during the dry period by strictly selected cows. In Proceedings of the Symposium of the BpT-Congress, Nürnberg 2004, pp. 19–24Google Scholar
Berry, EA & Hillerton, JE 2002a The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2512–2520Google Scholar
Berry, EA & Hillerton, JE 2002b The effect of selective dry cow treatment on new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 85 112–121Google Scholar
Berry, EA & Hillerton, JE 2007 Effect of an intramammary teat seal and dry cow antibiotic in relation to dry period length on postpartum mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 90 760–765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, EA, Hogeveen, H & Hillerton, JE 2004 Decision tree analysis to evaluate dry cow strategies under UK conditions. Journal of Dairy Research 71 409–418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2000 A study of the incidence and significance of intramammary enterobacterial infections acquired during the dry period. Journal of Dairy Science 83 1957–1965Google Scholar
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2001a A study of the incidence and significance of Gram-positive infections acquired during the dry period under UK field conditions. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council 2001, Reno, Nevada, Madison, WI: National Mastitis Council, pp. 185–186Google Scholar
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2001b An investigation of the impact of intramammary antibiotic dry cow therapy on clinical coliform mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 84 1632–1639Google Scholar
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2004 The importance of the non lactating period in the epidemiology of intramammary infection and strategies for prevention. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 20 547–68Google Scholar
Bramley, AJ 1982 Sources of Streptococcus uberis in the dairy herd. I. Isolation from bovine faeces and from straw bedding of cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 49 369–373Google Scholar
Bramley, AJ & Dodd, DF 1984 Reviews of the progress of dairy science. Mastitis control: progress and prospects. Journal of Dairy Science 51 481–512Google Scholar
Capuco, AV, Bright, SA, Pankey, JW, Wood, DL, Miller, RH & Bitman, J 1992 Increased susceptibility to intramammary infection following removal of teat canal keratin. Journal of Dairy Science 75 2126–2130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comalli, M, Eberhart, R, Griel, L Jr & Rothenbacher, H 1984 Changes in the microscopic anatomy of the bovine teat canal during mammary involution. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45 2236–2242Google ScholarPubMed
Dingwell, RT, Kelton, DF & Leslie, KE 2003 Management of the dry cow in control of peripartum disease and mastitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 19 235–265Google Scholar
Dixon, WJ (chief editor), 1993 BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Vols 1 and 2. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Dodd, F, Westgarth, D, Neave, F & Kingwill, R 1969 Symposium: Mastitis control: mastitis the strategy of control. Journal of Dairy Science 52 689–695Google Scholar
Godden, S, Fetrow, J, Bey, R, Stewart, S, Rapnicki, P, Farnsworth, R, Cook, N, Sanford, C, Dingwell, R & Leslie, K 2004 Concepts for prophylaxis of udder infections in the dry period. In Proceedings of the Symposium of the BpT-Congress, Nürnberg 2004, pp. 7–18Google Scholar
Godden, S, Rapnicki, P, Stewart, S, Fetrow, J, Johnson, A, Bey, R & Farnsworth, R 2003 Effectiveness of an internal teat seal in the prevention of new intramammary infections during the dry and early lactation periods in dairy cows when used with a dry cow intramammary antibiotic. Journal of Dairy Science 86 3899–3911Google Scholar
Green, MJ, Bradley, AJ, Medley, GF & Browne, WJ 2007 Cow, farm and management factors during the dry period that determine the rate of clinical mastitis after calving. Journal of Dairy Science 90 3764–3776Google Scholar
Green, MJ, Green, LE, Medley, GF, Schukken, YH & Bradley, AJ 2002 Influence of dry period bacterial infection on clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2589–2599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J, Redetzky, R & Grabowski, NT 2004 Cow-side mastitis test-possibilities and limitations. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, pp. 60–77. Charlotte, North Carolina, 2004Google Scholar
Huxley, JN, Green, MJ, Green, LE & Bradley, AJ 2002 Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period. Journal of Dairy Science 85 551–561Google Scholar
HVL 2008 Annual report of milk recording, Alsfeld 2008Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation (IDF) 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. Bulletin No. 132. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Lam, TJ, Schukken, YH, van Vliet, JH, Grommers, FJ, Tielen, MJ & Brand, A 1997 Effect of natural infection with minor pathogens on susceptibility to natural infection with major pathogens in the bovine mammary gland. American Journal of Veterinary Research 58 17–22Google Scholar
Le Van, PL, Eberhart, RJ & Kesler, EM 1985 Effects of natural intramammary Corynebacterium bovis infection on milk yield composition. Journal of Dairy Science 68 3329–3333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maunsell, FP, Morin, DE, Constable, PD, Hurly, WL & McCoy, GC 1999 Use of mammary gland and colostral characteristics for prediction of colostral IgG1 concentration an intramammary infections in Holstein cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 214 1817–1823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natzke, RP 1981 Elements of mastitis control. Journal of Dairy Science 64 1431–1442Google Scholar
Neave, F, Dodd, F & Henriques, E 1950 Udder infections in the dry period. Journal of Dairy Research 17 37–49Google Scholar
Newton, HT, Green, MJ, Benchaoui, H, Cracknell, V, Rowan, T & Bradley, AJ 2008 Comparison of the efficacy of cloxacillin alone and cloxacillin combined with an internal teat sealant for dry-cow therapy. Veterinary Record 162 678–684Google Scholar
Oliver, S, Lewis, TM, Dowlen, HH & Maki, JL 1991 Residues in milk and nonlactating mammary secretions following antibiotic therapy during lactation and at drying off. Tennessee Farm and Home Science–Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station (USA) 159 10–16Google Scholar
Rainard, P & Poutrel, B 1988 Effect of naturally occurring intramammary infections by minor pathogens on new infections by major pathogens in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49 327–329Google ScholarPubMed
Sargeant, JM, Leslie, KE, Shirley, JE, Pulkrabek, BJ, Lim, GH 2001 Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California mastitis test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2018–2024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrick, FN, Hockett, ME, Saxton, AM, Lewis, MJ, Dowlen, HH & Oliver, SP 2001 Influence of subclinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 84 1407–1412Google Scholar
Smith, A, Neave, FK & Dodd, FH 1966 Methods of reducing the incidence of udder infection in dry cows. Veterinary Record 79 233–234Google Scholar
Smith, A, Neave, FK, Dodd, FH, Jones, A & Gnore, DH 1967a The persistence of cloxacillin in the mammary gland when infused immediately after the last milking of lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 34 47–57Google Scholar
Smith, A, Neave, FK & Jones, A 1967b The persistence of penicillin G in the mammary gland when infused immediately after the last milking of lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 34 59–64Google Scholar
Todhunter, DA, Smith, KL & Hogan, JS 1995 Environmental streptococcal intramammary infections of the bovine mammary gland in cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78 2366–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, JH, Woolford, MW & Day, AM 1995 The prophylactic effect of a dry cow antibiotic against Streptococcus uberis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43 228–234Google Scholar
Woolford, MW, Williamson, JH, Day, AM & Copeman, PJA 1998 The prophylactic effect of a teat sealer on bovine mastitis during the dry period and the following lactation. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 46 12–16Google Scholar
Woolford, MW, Williamson, JH, Day, AM, Lacy-Hulbert, SJ & Henderson, HV 2001 Effect of localized antibiotic infusions applied to the teat canal and teat sinus at drying-off on mastitis in the dry period and at calving. Journal of Dairy Research 68 551–556Google Scholar