Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:35:15.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of feed supplements on the yield and composition of milk from cows grazing good pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
A. D. Drysdale
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. N. Watson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr

Summary

Two experiments are described in which spring-calved Ayrshire cows were fed supplementary food when grazing good, leafy pasture.

In the first experiment 6 lb of a mixture of three parts bruised oats and one part flaked maize was fed daily to three groups of five cows. One group received the supplement from 1 July until 30 October, and the other two groups from 1 August and 1 September respectively. A control group received no supplement.

In no month was there any statistical difference in daily milk yield between supplemented and unsupplemented groups of cows. The group fed from 1 July gave the highest total milk yield in the period June to October, but with a return of only 1 gal of milk from 34 lb of meal.

The length of the lactation was not significantly affected by the treatment.

In the second experiment, three groups of four cows on a 9-week change-over trial (4 May-5 July) grazed herbage containing an average of only 17·6% dry matter and 3·8% crude fibre. On the three treatments the cows ate pasture only, pasture plus 1·6 lb hay/day and pasture plus 5·7 lb of meal/day. The meal consisted of four parts by weight of undecorticated cotton cake, four of bruised oats and three of locust beans.

Milk yield was significantly increased from 41·8 lb on the all-grass ration to 43·2 lb/day on the meal treatment but the hay did not affect milk yield.

The fat content of the milk was significantly increased from 3·77 to 3·91% on the hay treatment, whereas the solids-not-fat content of the milk was not significantly affected by any of the treatments.

At the present-day prices of the feeds and with cows on good leafy pasture it was clearly uneconomic to feed the meal supplements.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1956). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 3.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1959). Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock, p. 21. London: Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1959). Supplement to Dairy Fmr, Lond., 6, 14.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. & Boyne, A. W. (1958). J. agric. Sci. 51, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frens, A. M. (1955). Publ. Europ. Ass. Anim. Prod. (Reading), no. 6, 94.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. A. (1952). J. Fmrs' Cl., Lond., part 4, 3.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, H. H. (1958). Kieler Milchwirtschaft ForschBerichte, 10, 137.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. (1958). J. Yorks agric. Soc., no. 109, 17.Google Scholar
MaClusky, D. S. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 45.Google Scholar
McClymont, G. L. (1950). Aust. vet. J. 26, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (19581959). Rep. Prod. Div., Thames Ditton, no. 9, 68.Google Scholar
't Hart, M. L. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassl. Congr., New Zealand, p. 70.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1957). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar