Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:19:39.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilization by lactating dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Frederick J. Gordon ,
Michael G. Porter ,
C. Sinclair Mayne ,
Edmund F. Unsworth  and
David J. Kilpatrick
Frederick J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5TX and The Queens University Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
Michael G. Porter
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland
C. Sinclair Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5TX and The Queens University Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
Edmund F. Unsworth
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen's University, Belfast
David J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biometrics, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen's University, Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Six lactating dairy cows were used in a three period, part balanced changeover design experiment to investigate the effects of forage digestibility and concentrate composition on the efficiency of nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows. Six treatments comprising three forage regimens and two concentrate types (starch υ. fibre) were examined in a 3 × 2 factorial design. The three forage regimens were high digestibility grass silage offered ad lib. (HA) or restricted to 6·5 kg dry matter/d (HR) and a low digestibility grass silage offered ad lib. (LA). Within each forage regimen animals were offered 10 kg·d of supplements containing either high-starch or high-fibre concentrations. Experimental periods lasted 28 d with a 10 d recording period, during which animal performance, ration digestibility and nitrogen and energy utilization were measured. Respiratory exchange measurements were made over a 72 h period using indirect open-circuit calorimetry. Throughout the experiment, there were no significant forage × concentrate interactions in any of the intake, production or nutrient utilization results. Milk yield was significantly influenced by forage regimen (24·1, 21·7 and 21·9 kg/d for HA, HR and LA respectively) and concentrate type (21·6 and 23·5 kg/d for high-starch and high-fibre respectively). Concentrate type also significantly influenced milk protein concentration (32·8 and 30·9 g/kg for high-starch and high-fibre respectively). Forage regimen significantly influenced the efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy (ME) for milk production (κ1) with values of 0·62, 0·64 and 0·59 for HA, HR and LA respectively. Concentrate type had no significant effect on ME intake, heat production or κ1, although animals receiving the high-fibre concentrates synthesized proportionately 0·11 more milk energy per unit of available energy (ME intake – heat production) than those receiving the high-starch concentrates. Interpolation of the values obtained with the two high digestibility forage regimens indicated that at similar ME intakes there was a trend towards a higher κ1 with the diet based on high digestibility silage, and this was in line with the higher metabolizability of the overall diet with this silage.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 15 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council 1980 Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock: Technical Review, 2nd edn. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural BureauxGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Spooner, M. C., Haines, M. J. & Harland, J. I. 1989 Effect of concentrate type on energy utilisation in lactating dairy cows. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Symposium 11, 1988, pp. 33–36 (Eds Honing, Y. van der and Close, W. H.). Wageningen: Pudoc(EAAP Publication no. 43)Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D., Cammell, S. B., Haines, M. J., Spooner, M. C. & Harland, J. I. 1991 Energy balance for dairy cows given grass silage with either barley or molassed sugar beet feed in the concentrates. Animal Production 52 573–574Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Broster, V. J., Smith, T., Siviter, J. W., Johnson, V. W., Napper, D. J. & Schuller, E. 1985 The influence of plane of nutrition and diet composition on the performance of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 104 535–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980 The effect of interval between harvests and wilting on silage for milk production. Animal Production 31 35–41Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. & Gordon, F. J. 1984 The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39 65–76Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. & Armstrong, D. G. 1987 A note on concentrate energy source for dairy cows in mid lactation. Animal Production 45 321–323Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. & Armstrong, D. G. 1988 Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silage ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate allowance. Animal Production 46 317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. & Gordon, F. J. 1980 The effect of level and system of concentrate allocation to January/February calving cows on total lactation performance. Animal Production 30 39–51Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V., Napper, D. J. & Givens, D. I. 1987 A comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for milk production, energy utilization and hay intake by Friesian cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 109 375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J., Spooner, M. C. & Harland, J. I. 1991 The effect of energy and protein sources on energy and nitrogen balances in Friesian cows in early lactation. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, pp. 288–291 (Eds Wenk, C. and Boessinger, M.). Zurich: ETHGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Daley, S. R., Haines, M. J. & Thomson, D. J. 1988 Comparison of dried molassed and unmolassed sugar-beet feed and barley at two protein levels for milk production in early lactation. Animal Productio. 46 490 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1986 Conserved forages. In Feeding Strategies for Dairy Cows, pp. 8.1–8.14 (Eds Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Tayler, J. C.). London: Agricultural Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Daley, S. R. & Bass, J. 1986 Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42 315–325Google Scholar
Van ES, A. J. H. & Van Der Honing, Y. 1979 Energy utilization. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow, pp. 68–89 (Eds Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.). St Albans: Granada (EAAP Publication no. 25)Google Scholar