Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T00:02:00.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the protein, citrate and phosphate content of milk on formation of lactulose during heat treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Geoffrey R. Andrews
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
S. Krishna Prasad
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK

Summary

Milk ultrafiltrate and milks of varying protein, citrate and phosphate concentrations were heated in sealed containers. Protein was found not to be involved in the mechanism of formation of lactulose, but increasing the protein content of milk reduced the concentration of lactulose after heating. This was considered to be due to increased condensation of lactose and lactulose with amino groups of the protein, Less lactulose was formed in milk ultrafiltrate than in skimmed milk accorded the same heat treatment, which was attributed to the buffering capacity of the milk protein in skimmed milk. Activation energies for lactulose formation in skimmed milk and in ultrafiltrate were 128 and 131 kJ/mol respectively. Citrate and phosphate catalysed the formation of lactulose. It is proposed that the formation of free lactulose in heated milk and ultrafiltrate proceeds exclusively by the Lobry de Bruyn-Alberda van Ekenstein transformation with the naturally occurring phosphate and citrate acting as base catalysts.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adachi, S. 1958 Formation of lactulose and tagatose from lactose in strongly heated milk. Nature 181 840841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adachi, S. & Patton, S. 1961 Presence and significance of lactulose in milk products: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 44 1375–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1984 Distinguishing pasteurized, UHT and sterilized milks by their lactulose content. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 37 9295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1985 Determining the energy of activation for the formation of lactulose in heated milks. Journal of Dairy Research 52 275280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1986 The lactulose content and colour of UHT and sterilized milk. Ph.D. Thesis, University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. 1984 Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science: The bacteriological, chemical, biochemical and physical changes that occur in milk at temperatures of 100–150°C. Journal of Dairy Research 51 341363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florence, E., Knight, D. J., Owen, J. A., Milner, D. F. & Harris, W. M. 1985 Nutrient content of liquid milk as retailed in the UK. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 38 121127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, H. 1984 Untersuchungen zur analytischen Kontrolle der Warmebelastung von Konsummilch. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität, MünchenGoogle Scholar
Geier, H. & Klostermeyer, H. 1980 [Enzymic determination of lactulose]. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und-Forschung 171 443445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, H. & Klostermeyer, H. 1983 Formation of lactulose during heat treatment of milk. Milchwissenschaft 38 475477Google Scholar
Greig, B. D. & Payne, G. A. 1985 Epimerization of lactose to free lactulose in heated model milk solutions. Journal of Dairy Research 52 409417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1984 a Definitions of heat treatment as applied to milk and milk products. Questionnaire 1085/D. Brussels: IDFGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1984 b Definitions of heat treatment as applied to milk and milk products. D-Doc 120. Brussels: IDFGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Koops, J. 1962 Preparation and properties of a salt solution which simulates milk ultrafiltrate. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 16 153164Google Scholar
Jenness, R. & Patton, S. 1959 Principles of Dairy Chemistry, p. 161. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Klostermeyer, H. & Geier, H. 1983 [Heat treatment of milk] Deutsche Milchwirtschaft 34 16671673Google Scholar
Loo, L. G. W. Van Der 1983 [Differences between different types of milk preserved by heating]. Zuivelzicht 75 116–118; 138141Google Scholar
Martinez-Castro, I. & Olano, A. 1978 [Determination of lactulose in commercial milks]. Revista Española de Lechería 110 213217Google Scholar
Martinez-Castro, I. & Olano, A. 1980 Influence of thermal processing on the carbohydrate composition of milk. Milchwissenschaft 35 58Google Scholar
Pavey, J. A., Hillier, R. M. & Burton, H. 1982 The turbidity test applied to UHT milk. 21st International Dairy Congress, Moscow 1(1) 260261Google Scholar
Pien, J. 1972 Method for distinguishing between UHT and conventional sterilized milks. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin Document 68 5455Google Scholar
Richards, E. L. & Chandrasekhara, M. R. 1960 Chemical changes in dried skim-milk during storage. Journal of Dairy Research 27 5966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadow, J. G. 1980 UHT milk — standards and quality assurance. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 140144Google Scholar