Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:22:01.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High shear treatment of concentrates and drying conditions influence the solubility of milk protein concentrate powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Mary Ann Augustin ,
Peerasak Sanguansri ,
Roderick Williams  and
Helen Andrews
Mary Ann Augustin*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Animal Food and Health Sciences, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Peerasak Sanguansri
Affiliation:
CSIRO Animal Food and Health Sciences, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Roderick Williams
Affiliation:
CSIRO Animal Food and Health Sciences, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Helen Andrews
Affiliation:
CSIRO Animal Food and Health Sciences, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: maryann.augustin@csiro.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The solubility of milk protein concentrate (MPC) powders was influenced by the method used for preparing the concentrate, drying conditions, and the type of dryer used. Increasing total solids of the ultrafiltered concentrates (23% total solids, TS) by diafiltration to 25% TS or evaporation to 31% TS decreased the solubility of MPC powders (80–83% protein, w/w dry basis), with ultrafiltration followed by evaporation to higher total solids having the greater detrimental effect on solubility. High shear treatment (homogenisation at 350/100 bar, microfluidisation at 800 bar or ultrasonication at 24 kHz, 600 watts) of ultrafiltered and diafiltered milk protein concentrates prior to spray drying increased the nitrogen solubility of MPC powders (82% protein, w/w dry basis). Of the treatments applied, microfluidisation was the most effective for increasing nitrogen solubility of MPC powders after manufacture and during storage. Manufacture of MPC powders (91% protein, w/w dry basis) prepared on two different pilot-scale dryers (single stage or two stage) from milk protein concentrates (20% TS) resulted in powders with different nitrogen solubility and an altered response to the effects of microfluidisation. Microfluidisation (400, 800 and 1200 bar) of the concentrate prior to drying resulted in increased long term solubility of MPC powders that were prepared on a single stage dryer but not those produced on a two stage spray dryer. This work demonstrates that microfluidisation can be used as a physical intervention for improving MPC powder solubility. Interactions between the method of preparation and treatment of concentrate prior to drying, the drying conditions and dryer type all influence MPC solubility characteristics.

Keywords

Milk protein concentratepowdershearsolubilitymicrofluidisation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 459 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anema, SG, Pinder, DN, Hunter, RJ & Hemar, Y 2006 Effects of storage temperature on the solubility of milk protein concentrate (MPC85). Food Hydrocolloids 20 386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, AJ, Baucke, AG & Sanderson, WB 1980 The effect of concentrate viscosity on the properties of spray dried skim milk powder. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 15 289–297Google Scholar
Bhaskar, GV, Singh, H & Blazey, ND 2003 Milk protein products and processes. US Patent US 2003/0096036Google Scholar
Bienvenue, A, Jiménez-Flores, R & Singh, H 2003 Rheological properties of concentrated skim milk: influence of heat treatment and genetic variants on the changes in viscosity during storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51 6488–6494Google Scholar
Bloore, CG & Boag, IF 1981 Some factors affecting the viscosity of concentrated skim milk. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 16 143–154Google Scholar
Bloore, CG & Boag, IF 1982 The effect of processing variable on spray-dried milk powder. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 17 103–120Google Scholar
Carr, A 2002 Monovalent salt enhances solubility of milk protein concentrate. PCT Patent WO 02/096208Google Scholar
Crowe, JH, Carpenter, JF & Crowe, LM 1998 The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annual Review of Physiology 60 37–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalgleish, DG, Tosh, SM & West, S 1996 Beyond homogenization: the formation of very small emulsion droplets during the processing of milk by a microfluidizer. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 50 135–148Google Scholar
De Castro, M & Harper, WJ 2001 Effect of drying on characteristics of 70% milk protein concentrate. Milchwissenschaft 56 269–272Google Scholar
De Castro-Morel, M & Harper, WJ 2002 Basic functionality of commercial milk protein concentrates. Milchwissenschaft 57 367–370Google Scholar
De Castro-Morel, M & Harper, WJ 2003 Effect of retentate heat treatment and spray dryer inlet temperature on the properties of milk protein concentrates (MPC's). Milchwissenschaft 58 13–15Google Scholar
Dybing, ST, Bhaskar, GV, Dunlop, FP, Fayerman, AM & Whitton, MJ 2003 Modified milk protein concentrates and their use in making gels and dairy products. US Patent US2003/0054068Google Scholar
Gaiani, C, Morand, M, Sanchez, C, Arab Tehrany, E, Jacquot, M, Schuck, P, Jeantet, R & Scher, J 2010 How surface composition of high milk protein powders in influenced by spray-drying temperature. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 75 377–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaiani, C, Mullet, M, Arab-Tehrany, E, Jacquot, M, Perroud, C, Renard, A & Scher, J 2011 Milk proteins differentiation and competitive adsorption during spray-drying. Food Hydrocolloids 25 983–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getler, J, Nielsen, A & Sprogø, J 1997 Functional process for MPC. Dairy Industries International 62(3) 25, 27Google Scholar
Huffman, LM & Harper, WJ 1999 Maximizing the value of milk through separation technologies. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2238–2244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IDF 1988 Dried milk protein products: determination of insolubility index. IDF Standard 129A. Brussels: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
IDF 1995 Dried milk protein products: determination of nitrogen solubility index. IDF Standard (provisional) 173. Brussels: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
IDF 2000 Milk and milk products: determination of nitrogen content: routine method by combustion according to Dumas principle. IDF Standard (provisional)185. Brussels: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
Kitabatake, N, Indo, K & Doi, E 1989 Changes in interfacial properties of hen egg ovalbumin caused by freeze-drying and spray-drying. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 37 905–910Google Scholar
Landström, K, Arnebrant, T & Bergenståhl, B 2003 Competitive protein adsorption between beta-casein and beta-lactoglobulin during spray-drying: effect of calcium induced association. Food Hydrocolloids 17 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonelli, C & Mason, TJ 2010 Microwave and ultrasonic processing: now a realistic option for industry. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2010 885–900Google Scholar
Lodaite, K, Chevalier, F, Armaforte, E & Kelly, AL 2009 Effect of high-pressure homogenisation on rheological properties of rennet-induced skim milk and standardised milk gels. Journal of Dairy Research 76 294–300Google Scholar
Maa, Y-F & Hsu, CC 1999 Performance of sonication and microfluidisation for liquid–liquid emulsification. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 4 233–240Google Scholar
Mimouni, A, Deeth, HC, Whittaker, AK, Gidley, MJ & Bhandari, BR 2010a Rehydration of high-protein-containing dairy powder: slow- and fast-dissolving components and storage effects. Dairy Science and Technology 90 335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimouni, A, Deeth, HC, Whittaker, AK, Gidley, MJ & Bhandari, BR 2010b Investigation of the microstructure of milk protein concentrate powders during rehydration: alterations during storage. Journal of Dairy Science 93 463–472Google Scholar
Nguyen, NHA & Anema, SG 2010 Effect of ultrasonication on the properties of skim milk used in the formation of acid gels. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 11 616–622Google Scholar
Novak, Ä 1996 Application of membrane filtration in the production of milk protein concentrates. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 311 26–27Google Scholar
Sandra, S & Dalgleish, DG 2005 Effects of ultra-high-pressure homogenization and heating on structural properties of casein micelles in reconstituted skim milk powder. International Dairy Journal 15 1095–1104Google Scholar
Schuck, P 2009 Understanding the factors effectively the factors affecting spray-dried dairy powder properties and behaviour. In Dairy-derived Ingredients, Food and Nutraceutical Uses, pp. 24–50. (Ed. Corredig, M), Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LCCGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P, Davanel, A, Mariette, F, Briard, V, Méjean, S & Piot, M 2002 Rehydration of casein powders: effects of added mineral salts and salt addition methods on water transfer. International Dairy Journal 12 51–57Google Scholar
Schuck, P, Méjean, S, Dolivet, A, Beaucher, E & Famelart, MH 2005 Pump amperage: a new method for monitoring viscosity of dairy concentrates before spray drying. Lait 85 361–367Google Scholar
Snoeren, THM, Damman, AJ & Klok, HJ 1982 The viscosity of skim-milk concentrates. Netherlands Milk Dairy Journal 36 305–316Google Scholar
Snoeren, THM, Damman, AJ & Klok, HJ 1983 The viscosity of whole milk concentrate and its effect on the properties of dried whole milk. Voedingsmiddelentechnologie 16 68–71Google Scholar
Trinh, B, Haisman, D & Trinh, KT 2007 Rheological characterisation of age thickening with special reference to milk concentrates. Journal of Dairy Research 74 106–115Google Scholar
Thompson, SJ & deMan, JM 1975 Concentration and fractionation of milk by ultrafiltration. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 8 113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udabage, P, Puvanenthiran, A, Yoo, JA, Versteeg, C & Augustin, MA 2012 Modified water solubility of milk protein concentrate powders through the application of static high pressure treatment. Journal of Dairy Research 79 76–83Google Scholar
Walstra, P 1980 The effects of homogenization on milk plasma. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 9 189–192Google Scholar
Zisu, B, Bhaskaracharya, R, Kentish, S & Ashokkumar, M 2010 Ultrasonic processing of dairy systems in large scale reactors. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 17 1075–1081Google Scholar
Zwijgers, A 1992 Outline of milk protein concentrate. International Food Ingredients 3 18–23.Google Scholar