Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T01:28:52.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isolation of κ-casein glycomacropeptide from bovine whey fraction using food grade anion exchange resin and chitin as an adsorbent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2020

Takuo Nakano*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2P5, Canada
Mirko Betti
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2P5, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Takuo Nakano, Email: takuonakano@hotmail.com

Abstract

Bovine κ-casein glycomacropeptide (GMP) found in cheese whey is a sialylated phosphorylated peptide which is thought to be a potential ingredient for functional food as well as dietetic food. This study was undertaken to determine whether high purity GMP can be isolated from soluble whey fraction (SWF) using column chromatography on food grade anion exchange resin and chitin as an adsorbent. Samples of commercially available anion exchange resin (resin A, resin B and resin C) and those of chitin (chitin A, chitin B and chitin C) were examined in this experiment. The GMP fraction obtained from each column was analyzed for amino acid composition which reflects the purity of the peptide. Major findings for commercial anion exchange resin were that: (1) the proportion of GMP monitored as sialic acid in total recovered sialic acid was similar among the three samples of resin accounting for average 78% of recovered sialic acid; (2) the GMP fraction from resin A or resin B contained undetectable level of contaminating amino acids including phenylalanine, histidine, arginine and tyrosine; (3) the GMP fraction from resin C contained small amounts (<1 mol%) of contaminating amino acids, arginine, phenylalanine and tyrosine; and (4) the GMP binding capacity expressed as mg/100 mg dry weight of resin was more than 2.5 times higher in resin C (average 22.9) than in resin A or resin B with no difference between resin A and resin B averaging 8.7. Results obtained for chitin A, chitin B and chitin C were in general similar to those found with resin A and resin B. Since chitin has a remarkable GMP binding capacity averaging 8.6 mg/100 mg dry weight of chitin, it may be a useful adsorbent for whey fractionation. Further research is needed to develop an efficient inexpensive method to purify GMP.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd El-Salam, MH (2006) Separation of casein glycomacropeptide from whey: methods of potential industrial application. International Journal of Dairy Science 1, 9399.Google Scholar
Abd El-Salam, HM, El-Shibiny, S and Buchheim, W (1996) Characteristics and potential uses of the casein macropeptide. International Dairy Journal 6, 327341.Google Scholar
Amersham Biosciences (1999) Ion Exchange Chromatography. Principles and Methods. Uppsala, Sweden: Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, pp. 104106.Google Scholar
Brody, EP (2000) Biological activities of bovine glycomacropeptide. British Journal of Nutrition 84(suppl. 1), S39S46.Google ScholarPubMed
Christensen, J and Holst, HH (2014) Method of producing a composition containing caseinomacropeptide. Patent WO 2014076252, A1.Google Scholar
Eigel, WN, Butler, JE, Ernstrom, CA, Farrel, HM Jr, Harwalker, VR, Jeness, R and Whitney, R (1984) Nomenclature of proteins of cow's milk. Fifth revision. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 15991631.Google Scholar
Hassainia, A, Satha, H and Boufi, S (2018) Chitin from Agaricus bisporus: extraction and characterization. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 117, 13341342.Google ScholarPubMed
Hisamatsu, M and Yamada, T (1989) Partially deacetylated chitin as an acid-stable support for enzyme immobilization. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 67, 219220.Google Scholar
LaClair, CE, Ney, DM, MacLeod, EL and Etzel, MR (2009) Purification and use of glycomacropeptide for nutritional management of phenylketonuria. Journal of Food Science 74, E199E206.Google ScholarPubMed
Léonil, J and Mollé, D (1991) A method for determination of macropeptide by cation-exchange fast protein liquid chromatography and its use for following the action of chymosin in milk. Journal of Dairy Research 58, 321328.Google Scholar
Li, C, Song, X, Hein, S and Wang, K (2010) The separation of GMP from milk whey using the modified chitosan beads. Adsorption 16, 8591.Google Scholar
Manso, MA and López-Fandiño, R (2004) κ-Casein macropeptides from cheese whey: physicochemical, biological, nutritional, and technological features for possible uses. Food Reviews International 20, 329355.Google Scholar
Nakano, T and Ozimek, L (1998) Gel chromatography of glycomacropeptide (GMP) from sweet whey on Sephacryl S-200 at different pH's and on Sephadex G75 in 6M guanidine hydrochloride. Milchwissenschaft 53, 629633.Google Scholar
Nakano, T and Ozimek, L (1999) Purification of glycomacropeptide from non-dialyzable fraction of sweet whey by anion-exchange chromatography. Biotechnology Techniques 13, 739742.Google Scholar
Nakano, T and Ozimek, L (2000) Purification of glycomacropeptide from dialyzed and non-dialyzed sweet whey by anion-exchange chromatography at different pH values. Biotechnology Letters 22, 10811086.Google Scholar
Nakano, T and Ozimek, L (2015) Selective removal of phenylalanine impurities from commercial κ- casein glycomacropeptide by anion exchange chromatography. Journal of Food Processing and Technology 7, 537.Google Scholar
Nakano, K, Nakano, T, Ahn, DU and Sim, JS (1994) Sialic acid contents in chicken eggs and tissues. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 601606.Google Scholar
Nakano, T, Ikawa, N and Ozimek, L (2004) Use of epichlorohydrin-treated chitosan resin as an adsorbent to isolate κ-casein glycomacropeptide from sweet whey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 75557560.Google ScholarPubMed
Nakano, T, Ozimek, L and Betti, M (2018) Separation of bovine κ-casein glycomacropeptide from sweet whey protein products with undetectable level of phenylalanine by protein precipitation followed by anion exchange chromatography. Journal of Dairy Research 85, 110113.Google ScholarPubMed
Neelima, , Sharma, R, Rajput, YS and Mann, B (2013) Chemical and functional properties of glycomacropeptide (GMP) and its role in detection of cheese whey adulteration in milk: a review. Dairy Science and Technology 93, 2143.Google ScholarPubMed
Outinen, M, Tossavainen, O, Syväoja, E-L and Korhonen, H (1995) Chromatographic isolation of κ- casein macropeptide from cheese whey with a strong basic anion exchange resin. Milchwissenschaft 50, 570574.Google Scholar
Peter, MG (2005) Chitin and chitosan from animal sources. In Steinbȕchel, A and Marchessault, RH (eds), Biopolymers for Medical and Pharmaceutical Applications, vol. 1. Humic substances, polyisoprenoids, polyesters, and polysaccharides, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 419512Google Scholar
Saito, T, Yamaji, A and Ito, T (1991) A new isolation method of caseinoglycopeptide from sweet cheese whey. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 28312837.Google Scholar
Shahidi, F, Arachchi, JKV and Jeon, Y-J (1999) Food applications of chitin and chitosans. Trends in Food Science & Technology 10, 3751.Google Scholar
Thomä-Worringer, C, Sørensen, J and López-Fandiño, R (2006) Health effects and technological features of caseinomacropeptide. International Dairy Journal 16, 13241333.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Nakano and Betti Supplementary Materials

Nakano and Betti Supplementary Materials

Download Nakano and Betti Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 333.3 KB