Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T05:14:55.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The oxidation-reduction potential of sterilized milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Constance Higginbottom  and
Margaret M. Taylor
Constance Higginbottom
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Margaret M. Taylor
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

For milk sterilized under partial vacuum in closed bottles the oxidation-reduction potential measured under nitrogen was markedly lower (—280 to —300 mV) than that of milk heated in bottles open to the air, measurements being made in air (+10 to —30 mV).

The Eh (under nitrogen) of commercial sterilized milk and of ultra-high-temperature short-time heated milk was in the range —200 to —300 mV and of the same order as that obtained in the laboratory for deaerated milk sterilized in closed bottles.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1960 , pp. 245 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Greenbank, G. R. & Wright, P. A. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, H. A., Coulter, S. T. & Jenness, R. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, C. & Taylor, M. M. (1960 a). J. Dairy Res. 27, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, C. & Taylor, M. M. (1960 b). J. Dairy Res. 27, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifson, E. (1931). J. Bact. 21, 331.Google Scholar
Tobler, F. R. (1955). Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Zurich. Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Twigg, R. S. (1937). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Lond., 56, 129.Google Scholar