Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T21:55:26.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taiwan's State and Social Movements Under the DPP Government, 2000–2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Ming-sho Ho
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of social movement politics under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government (2000–2004) by using the perspective of political opportunity structure. Recent “contentious politics” in Taiwan is analyzed in terms of four changing dimensions of the opportunity structure. First, the DPP government opens some policy channels, and social movement activists are given chances to work within the institution. Yet other features of the political landscape are less favorable to movement activists. Incumbent elites' political orientation shifts. As the economic recession sets in, there is a conservative policy turn. Political instability incurs widespread countermoblization to limit reform. Last, the Pan-Blue camp, now in opposition, devises its own social movement strategy. Some social movement issues gain political salience as a consequence of the intervention of the opposition parties, but its excessive opportunism also encourages the revolt of antireform forces. As a result of these countervailing factors, social movements have made only limited gains from the recent turnover of power.

Keywords

social movementdemocratizationpolitical opportunityTaiwanDemocratic Progressive Party
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 2005 , pp. 401 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

This study is in part supported by Taiwan's National Science Council (NSC93-2413-H-343-007-FG). I would like to thank Stephan Haggard, Tieh-chih Chang, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.Google Scholar

1. Hsiao, Michael Hsin-huang, “Emerging Social Movements and the Rise of a Demanding Civil Society in Taiwan,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24 (1990): 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Cited from http://www.sinorama.com.tw/ch/print_issue.php3?id=2003119211077c.txt&mag=past.Google Scholar

3. Rucht, David, “The Strategies and Action Repertoires of New Movements.” In Dalton, Russell J. and Kuechler, Manfred, eds., Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies (Oxford: Polity Press, 1990), pp. 156–175.Google Scholar

4. Einsinger, Peter K., “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities,” American Political Science Review 67, No. 1 1973): 11–28.Google Scholar

5. Tarrow, Sidney, Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–1975 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

6. McAdam, Doug, Political Process and Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

7. McAdam, Doug, “Conceptual Origins, Problems, Future Directions.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 26–29.Google Scholar

8. Marks, Gary and McAdam, Doug, “On the Relationship of Political Opportunity Structure to the Form of Collective Action: The Case of the European Union.” In della Porta, Donatella et al., eds., Social Movements in a Globalizing World (London: Macmillan, 1999), p. 99; Tarrow, Sidney, “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In McAdam, McCarthy, and Zald, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, pp. 41–61.Google Scholar

9. Kitschelt, Herbert, “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1986): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Kriesi, Hanspeter et al., New Social Movements in Western Europe (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), pp. 33–34.Google Scholar

11. Tarrow, Sidney G., Power in Movement, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 87.Google Scholar

12. Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard, Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail (New York: Vintage Books, 1977).Google Scholar

13. Goodwin, Jeff and Jasper, James M., “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory,” Sociological Forum 14 (1999): 27–55.Google Scholar

14. Gamson, William A. and Meyer, David S., “Framing Political Opportunity.” In McAdam, , McCarthy, , and Zald, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, p. 283.Google Scholar

15. Chang, Mau-kuei et al., Minkuo ch'ishih nientai taiwan tich'u tzulichiuchi shihchien chih yenchiu [A study on Taiwan's “self-help” actions in the 1980s] (Taipei: Research, Evaluation, Development Commission of Executive Yuan, 1992), p. 26.Google Scholar

16. Reardon-Anderson, James, Pollution, Politics, and Foreign Investment in Taiwan: The Lukang Rebellion (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1992).Google Scholar

17. Chang, Mau-kuei, Shehui yüntung yü chengchih chuanhua [Social movement and political transition] (Taipei: Institute of National Policy Research, 1989).Google Scholar

18. Chu, Yun-han, Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute of National Policy Research, 1992); Wu, Jie-min, “Fantui yüntung yü shehui k'angyi te hutung“ [The interaction of opposition movement and social protests], Chungkuo Lunt'an [China Tribune] 335 (1989): 29–40.Google Scholar

19. Tarrow, , Power in Movement, pp. 96–99.Google Scholar

20. Hsieh, Frank Chang-ting, “Sheyünpu tutao ch'uangwei hsiehch'uangt'ing paokaoshu“ [Report of supervisor of Department of Social Movement], Hsintaits ungshu [New Taiwan Series] 36 (1987): 12–21.Google Scholar

21. Chiu, Yi-jen and Yeh, Li-ssu, “Fanliuch'in, fanhossu, fantuts' ai: hsinch' aoliu te kungtsomupiao” [Against sixth naphtha cracker and fourth nuclear power plant: The short-term goal of New Tide], Hsinch' aoli [New Tide] 18 (1991): 4–7.Google Scholar

22. Kuo, Cheng-liang, Minchintang chuahsing chih t'ung [The pains of DPP's transition] (Taipei: T'ienhsia, 1998).Google Scholar

23. China Times, May 29, 1993, p. 3. For the DPP's calculative instrumentalism, see Jie-min Wu, “Chiehch'u k'olaosaiweitz'u te mochou: Fenhsi tangch'ien shehui kaiko yüntung te k'unching“ [Disenchanting of Clausewitz's charm: The tactical dilemma of Taiwan's reform social movements], Taiwanese Sociology 4 (2002): 159–198.Google Scholar

24. Fan, Yun, “Lienchieh yüntung yu pientung te chengchih chihuichiengo“ [Linking activists to the changing political opportunity structure]. In Chang, Mau-kuei and Cheng, Yung-nien, Liangan shehui yüntung fanhsi [Social movements on both sides of Taiwan straits] (Taipei: Shihtzujanchuyi, 2003) pp. 137–173.Google Scholar

25. In 1987, a moderate center-left Worker's Party was formed, and one year later, its left-wing faction walked out and built a Labor Party. Both failed to meet the electoral challenge and remained organizationally minuscule and politically invisible. Labor activists continued to embrace the idea of organizing a left-wing party, but a bona fide effort was not forthcoming. As late as 1998, as the independent unions joined together to form a new national federation, the idea of a new party was again brought into the agenda.Google Scholar

26. Though environmentalists did form a green party in 1996, it failed as a viable political alternative. See Ho, Ming-sho, “The Politics of Anti-nuclear Protest in Taiwan: A Case of Party-Dependent Movement (1980–2000),” Modern Asian Studies 37, No. 3 2003): 701–706.Google Scholar

27. Hsung, Ray-May and Chi, Chin-Shan, “Shihtzup'eiyüfa hsingch'eng te chengch'e fanch' ou yinghsiangli chichih“ [The influence mechanism of policy domain in the teacher education law], Taiwanese Sociology 4 (2002): 199–246.Google Scholar

28. Chen, Li-ju, T'aiwan chiaoshih jench'üan yüntung te hsingch'i yü chengch'e yinghsiang [The rise and policy impact of Taiwan's schoolteachers movement], (Nanhua University, Chiayi, Taiwan, 2004).Google Scholar

29. Ho, Ming-sho, “Contested Governance between Politics and Professionalism in Taiwan,” Journal of Contemporary Asia 34, No. 2 2004): 238–253.Google Scholar

30. Such was the case of Wu Li-feng, general secretary of Humanistic Education Foundation. She had been active in the education reform movement for a decade before she was invited to the position of privy secretary to the minister of education in May 2000. She worked in the Ministry of Education for one and a half years. During her tenure, she was very instrumental in pushing through the curriculum reform. After her tenure, she went back to work in the original education reform organization. Interview, February 13, 2004.Google Scholar

31. Interview with Hsu Chiung-tan, assistant to the Environmental Protection Administration director, December 21, 2001.Google Scholar

32. Interview with Yu-cheng, Hong, assistant to the Society for Promoting Sustainable Development, December 21, 2001.Google Scholar

33. Ho, Ming-sho, “Weakened State and Social Movement: The Paradox of Taiwanese Environmental Politics After the Power Transfer,” Journal of Contemporary China 14 (2005): 339–352.Google Scholar

34. China Times, April 8, 2001, p. 5.Google Scholar

35. Fu, Chien-wen, “Ts'ung ts'aiwu laiyüan k'an NGO te tzuchuhsing“ [NGO's autonomy: A perspective of financing sources], E-south paper (September 6, 2002). See the website http://tw.egroups.com/group/esouth-community (accessed November 2, 2004).Google Scholar

36. Chu, Yu-bin, “Don't Sacrifice the Civil Society for Political Reconciliation.” China Times, January 7, 2005, p. 15.Google Scholar

37. Interview with Chung-hong, Lin, former secretary of communication, Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions, January 31, 2004.Google Scholar

38. Solinger, Dorothy J., “Ending One-party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, Mexico,” Journal of Democracy 12, No. 1 2001): 36.Google Scholar

39. For example, during the 1996 presidential election, one labor union leader published an article in which he asked candidates to address the question of “prevalent black gold and growing gap between the rich and the poor.” China Times, March 8, 1996, p. 15.Google Scholar

40. See Huang's, Chang-ling analysis, “The Politics of Reregulation: Globalization, Democratization, and Taiwanese Labor Movement,” Developing Economies 40, No. 3 2002): 305–326.Google Scholar

41. Ho, , “Weakened State and Social Movement.”Google Scholar

42. China Times, May 17, 2002, p. 3.Google Scholar

43. United Daily, May 31, 2004, p. 3.Google Scholar

44. Rigger, Shelley, “Taiwan in 2002: Another Year of Political Droughts and Typhoons,” Asian Survey 43, No. 1 2002): 41–48.Google Scholar

45. China Times, November 18, 1993.Google Scholar

46. Central Daily, December 21, 1993.Google Scholar

47. China Times, September 19, 2003, p. C1.Google Scholar

48. See http://www.president.gov.tw/1_epaper/92/920710.html (accessed February 10, 2004).Google Scholar

49. See http://www.president.gov.tw/1_epaper/92/920717.html (accessed February 10, 2004).Google Scholar

50. United Daily, June 17, 2004, p. 6.Google Scholar

51. United Daily, June 20, 2004, p. 2.Google Scholar

52. Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).Google Scholar

53. China Times, February 12, 2001, p. 2.Google Scholar

54. For the detailed minutes of these conferences, see the website of the National Policy Foundation, http://www.npf.org.tw/main.htm (accessed November 7, 2004).Google Scholar

55. China Times, June 19, 2003, p. A2.Google Scholar

56. United Daily, August 30, 2003, p. 11.Google Scholar

57. China Times, June 19, 2003, p. A2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58. China Evening Post, September 12, 2003, p. 2.Google Scholar

59. China Evening Post, May 3, 2002, p. 2.Google Scholar

60. Both sides' explanation regarding this unhappy incident can be found in E-south paper, July 29–30, 2003, available at http://tw.egroups.com/group/esouth-community (accessed November 1, 2004).Google Scholar

61. Diamond, Larry, “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” In Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., eds., The Global Resurgence of Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), p. 227.Google Scholar

62. Tilly, Charles, Stories, Identities and Political Changes (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), p. 194.Google Scholar

63. Schmitter, Phillippe C., “The Consolidation of Democracy and Representation of Social Groups,” American Behavioral Scientist 36 (1992): 430–436.Google Scholar

64. Reinhelt, Claire, “Moving onto the Terrain of State: The Battered Women's Movement and the Politics of Engagement.” In Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey, eds., Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995), p. 85.Google Scholar