Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T10:00:53.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anglican Churchmen and the Establishment of the Jerusalem Bishopric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Extract

On 8 June 1841, Frederick William of Prussia sent Christian Carl Josias Bunsen on a special mission to England. Bunsen was to obtain the approval of the British government for a conference between himself on one side and Howley, as Primate of All England, and Blomfield, as immediate head of the congregations of the Anglican Church abroad, on the other. In this conference, he was to try to persuade the two prelates to concede to the Evangelical Church of Prussia ‘a sisterly position’ in the Holy Land. Deploring the disunity among Evangelical Protestants there, Frederick William instructed Bunsen to propose the establishment of a bishopric at Jerusalem as a joint enterprise by the Evangelical Church of Prussia and the Church of England. He would allow the clergy and missionaries of his own Church to work under the auspices of such a bishopric; and, whilst it was not his intention to sacrifice or jeopardise the independence of the Church of Prussia, any ordinations by the bishop of Jerusalem would be respected throughout his dominions. Two principles were to guide Bunsen: the utmost possible collaboration among protestants in the Turkish Empire, especially in the Holy Land, and the maintenance of an independent Evangelical German Church. Frederick William was intelligent enough to see that political and economic facts ruled out an exclusively Prussian episcopate in the Holy Land: it was a shrewd move to attach German congregations to a bishopric closely associated with the Church of England.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 193 note 1 Das Evangelische Bistum in Jerusalem: geschichtliche Darlegung mit Urkunden, Berlin 1846, 3341Google Scholar.

page 193 note 2 Hechler, W. H., The Jerusalem Bishopric, London 1883, Addenda, 36Google Scholar.

page 193 note 3 Ashwell, A. R., The Life of… Samuel Wilberforce, London 1880–2, i. 198200Google Scholar.

page 194 note 1 Halevy, E., A History of the English People, 1841–1852, London 1947, 52Google Scholar.

page 194 note 2 B. M. Add. MS. 40489 fol. 47: Aberdeen to Peel, 16 September 1841.

page 194 note 3 A Statement of Proceedings Relating to the Establishment of a Bishopric … in Jerusalem, London 1841, 3Google Scholar.

page 194 note 4 W. H. Hechler, op. cit., 97–9.

page 194 note 5 There was a change of government in September 1841.

page 194 note 6 B.M. Add. MS. 40489 fol. 45: Howley to Peel, 15 September 1841; ibid., fol. 47: Aberdeen to Peel, 16 September 1841; ibid., fol. 49: Howley to Aberdeen, 15 September 1841.

page 194 note 7 Known as the ‘Foreigners Consecration Act Amendment Bill’.

page 194 note 8 He was born in Posen in 1799 of Jewish parents, but baptised in 1825 in St. Andrew's, Plymouth.

page 195 note 1 A Statement of Proceedings Relating to the Establishment of a Bishopric … in Jerusalem, 4–9 passim.

page 195 note 2 Christian Observer, November 1841, New Series, xlvii. 703.

page 195 note 3 The Times, 19, 26, 29 October 1841.

page 195 note 4 Hansard, Third Series, lix. col. 473.

page 195 note 5 Ibid., col. 1103.

page 195 note 6 Ibid., cols. 495–6.

page 195 note 7 The Times, 28 October 1841.

page 195 note 8 A. R. Ashwell, op. cit., 198.

page 195 note 9 Ibid., 200–1. Cf. Biber, G. E., Bishop Blomfield and his Times, London 1857, 286Google Scholar.

page 195 note 10 A. R. Ashwell, op. cit., 195.

page 195 note 11 Blomfield, C. J., God's Ancient People Not Cast Away, London 1843, 23Google Scholar.

page 196 note 1 Ibid., 14.

page 196 note 2 Blomfield, C. J., The Light of the World, London 1842, 22Google Scholar.

page 196 note 3 Ibid., 23.

page 196 note 4 C. J. Blomfield, God's Ancient People Not Cast Away, 25.

page 196 note 5 Stock, E., The History of the Church Missionary Society, London 1922, i. 421Google Scholar.

page 196 note 6 B. M. Add. MS. 44358 fol. 201: Blomfield to Gladstone, 3 November 1841.

page 196 note 7 See the correspondence in B. M. Add. MS. 44358 fols. 190, 191, 197, 201, 230, 245, 250, 256.

page 196 note 8 This is the impression given in Church, R. W., The Oxford Movement, London 1891, 275Google Scholar.

page 196 note 9 Middleton, R. D., Magdalen Studies, London 1936, 153Google Scholar.

page 196 note 10 B. M. Add. MS. 44358 fol. 250: Blomfield to Gladstone, 27 November 1841.

page 196 note 11 The Times, 6 January 1842.

page 197 note 1 McCaul, A., The Jerusalem Bishopric, London 1845, 9Google Scholar.

page 197 note 2 A. McCaul, op. cit., 10.

page 197 note 3 Blomfield to J. Benson, Perpetual Curate of Hounslow, 27 October 1841. (Blomfield's Copybook, 16 September-27 October 1841).

page 197 note 4 Christian Observer, November 1841, New Series, xlvii. 703.

page 197 note 5 The extract from the Gazette is quoted by Maurice, F. D. in Three Letters to the Rev. W. Palmer, London 1842, 45–6Google Scholar.

page 197 note 6 Christian Observer, January 1842, New Series xlix. 7–12.

page 197 note 7 Ibid., 13.

page 198 note 1 A member of the Church of England, An Examination of an Announcement made in the ‘Prussian State Gazette’, Oxford 1842, 141–6Google Scholar.

page 198 note 2 Palmer, W., Aids to Reflection on the Seemingly Double Character of the Established Church, London 1841, 77112Google Scholar passim.

page 198 note 3 This is not the celebrated Tractarian of Worcester College but ‘William Palmer, Fellow and Tutor of St. Mary Magdalene (sic) College, Oxford, and deacon in the Church of England’.

page 198 note 4 B. M. Add. MS. 44358 fol. 149: Bellairs to Gladstone, 12 October 1841.

page 198 note 5 Ibid., fol. 359: Lord John Manners to Gladstone, 28 December 1841.

page 198 note 6 See, for instance, his letter to Gladstone on 5 January 1844: B. M. Add. MS. 44361 fol. 5.

page 198 note 7 Lathbury, D. C., Correspondence on Church and Religion of W. E. Gladstone, London i. 228–9Google Scholar.

page 198 note 8 B. M. Add. MS. 44358 fol. 197: Gladstone to Blomfield, 31 October 1841.

page 198 note 9 Ibid., fol. 190: Gladstone to Blomfield, 28 October 1841.

page 199 note 1 13 Eliz. c. 12.

page 199 note 2 B.M Add. MS. 44358 fol. 191: Blomfield to Gladstone, 29 October 1841.

page 199 note 3 Ibid., fol. 256: Gladstone to Blomfield, 30 November 1841.

page 199 note 4 Bunsen, C. C. J., The Constitution of the Church of the Future, London 1847Google Scholar, Preface, xxxiv. This letter was dated 2 September 1843.

page 199 note 5 C. C. J. Bunsen, op. cit., Preface, xlvi.

page 199 note 6 Ibid., 83.

page 199 note 7 Ibid., 84.

page 199 note 8 Ibid., 87.

page 200 note 1 A member of the Church of England, op. cit., 8.

page 200 note 2 Ibid., 9–10.

page 200 note 3 Ibid., 13.

page 200 note 4 Ibid., 49.

page 200 note 5 Christian Remembrancer, July 1846, New Series, xi.

page 200 note 6 Hare, J. C., A Vindication of the Chevalier Bunsen from the Charges of the ‘Christian Remembrancer’, London 1846, 26Google Scholar.

page 200 note 7 Ibid., 11.

page 200 note 8 Ibid., 16.

page 200 note 9 Ibid., 3.

page 200 note 10 Christian Observer, November 1841, New Series, xlviii. 703.

page 200 note 11 A. McCaul, 9.

page 201 note 1 Bowdler, C., A Letter on the Apostolic Succession, London 1841, 22Google Scholar.

page 201 note 2 Ibid., 13.

page 201 note 3 Ibid., 14.

page 201 note 4 Ibid., 3.

page 201 note 5 Ibid., 30.

page 201 note 6 Ibid., 43.

page 201 note 7 Ibid., 45.

page 201 note 8 Tyndall, W. H., The Only Authorised Christian Ministry, London 1847, 25Google Scholar.

page 201 note 9 Ibid., 28–36.

page 201 note 10 Ibid., 37–42.

page 201 note 11 Ibid., 13–17.

page 201 note 12 C. C. J. Bunsen, op. cit., 68–9.

page 201 note 13 W. H. Hechler, op. cit., 103–4.

page 201 note 14 In Tracts I and LXXIV.

page 201 note 15 A Member of the Church of England, op. cit., 142.

page 201 note 16 W. H. Hechler, op. cit., 91–5.

page 201 note 17 Sykes, N., Old Priest and New Presbyter, 1955, 211Google Scholar.

page 201 note 18 Ibid., 163.

page 202 note 1 Ibid., 156.

page 202 note 2 Ibid., 161.

page 202 note 3 F. D. Maurice, Three Letters to the Rev. W. Palmer, 2.

page 202 note 4 Ibid., 7.

page 202 note 5 Ibid., 13.

page 202 note 6 Ibid., 16–20.

page 202 note 7 Ibid., 30.

page 202 note 8 Ibid., 34.

page 202 note 9 Ibid., 36.

page 202 note 10 Ibid., 37.

page 202 note 11 Ibid., 53.

page 202 note 12 W. Palmer, op. cit., 23–32.

page 202 note 13 Ibid., 57.

page 203 note 1 Ibid., 73.

page 203 note 2 In the Appendix to the Three Letters to Palmer.

page 203 note 3 Hope, J. R., The Bishopric of the United Church of England and Ireland at Jerusalem, in a1 Letter to a Friend, London 1841Google Scholar.

page 203 note 4 F. D. Maurice, op. cit., 85.

page 203 note 5 Palmer, S. R., Memorials, Part I, London 1896, 316–17, 319Google Scholar.

page 203 note 6 F. D. Maurice, op. cit., 65.

page 203 note 7 A. R. Ashwell, op. cit., 213.

page 203 note 8 Ibid., 202.

page 203 note 9 Christian Observer, February 1842, New Series, v. 123.

page 204 note 1 Ibid., January-March 1846, New Series, xi. 209.

page 204 note 2 Ibid., February 1842, New Series, v. 123.

page 204 note 3 A. McCaul, op. cit., 14.

page 204 note 4 Ibid., 14.