^{page 60 note 1} Formerly D. 3.5, but now in a special safe.

^{page 60 note 2} Auct. v. 3.16.

^{page 60 note 3} Surtees Soc, lv (1872). 39–80.

^{page 60 note 4} The English Rite, 1915, cxvi–cxcviii.

^{page 60 note 5} Op. cit., xciii, xciv.

^{page 61 note 1} Op. cit., 189.

^{page 61 note 2} Op. cit., 203 ff.

^{page 61 note 3} Op. cit., 43.

^{page 61 note 4} Op. cit., 209.

^{page 61 note 5} Op. cit., ccxciii.

^{page 61 note 6} S.R. 5. F3.

^{page 61 note 7} Works, v. 231.

^{page 62 note 1} I.e. cast-off, or, as Dr. A. I. Doyle has suggested to me, ‘projected’.

^{page 62 note 2} Ornsby, in Cosin's Correspondence (Surtees Soc, lii, 1869), i. 139Google Scholar, quotes a similar passage as from this book; in his version it is ‘an old Communion Booke, scored and noted all along’. Only one edition of the work is recorded, so presumably he was quoting from memory.

^{page 62 note 3} State Papers: Domestic, Charles I, cviii. 75.

^{page 63 note 1} Ed. ‘Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology’, 1855.

^{page 63 note 2} Op. cit., 502, note.

^{page 63 note 3} Op. cit., cxci.

^{page 64 note 1} Correspondence, ii. 12, 13.

^{page 64 note 2} Particulars 1, 14, 21, 30, 31, (73), (78), (88). No. 67 also became superfluous when a new Act was proposed.

^{page 64 note 3} Bosher, Making of the Restoration Settlement, 223–4.

^{page 66 note 1} Bosher, Making of the Restoration Settlement, 223–4.

^{page 66 note 2} Gibson, Synodus Anglicana, 1854 ed., 210.

^{page 66 note 3} MS. Add. A. 213. It was printed by bishop W. Jacobson in 1874, in Fragmentary Illustrations of the Book of Common Prayer.

^{page 67 note 1} Works, v. 332.

^{page 68 note 1} Bosher, op. cit., 227.

^{page 68 note 2} Op. cit., ccviii.

^{page 68 note 3} D'Oyly, Life of W. Sancroft, ii. 72.

^{page 68 note 4} Correspondence, ii. 21.

^{page 68 note 5} Life, Oxford 1827, Continuation, 250.

^{page 68 note 6} Op. cit., cxcvi.

^{page 68 note 7} Op. cit., xxi, xxii.

^{page 69 note 1} Note by Sancroft in DB.

^{page 69 note 2} Correspondence, ii. 31.

^{page 69 note 3} Parker, op. cit., lxxxviii. I incline to ascribe the rejection of the new Canon to Sheldon.

^{page 69 note 4} Op. cit., 201.

^{page 69 note 5} Parker, op. cit., lxxxvi.

^{page 70 note 1} Bosher, op. cit., 231–6.

^{page 71 note 1} Op. cit., cccv.

^{page 71 note 2} Op. cit., ccxxiv.

^{page 72 note 1} Ornsby prints them in the Correspondence (ii. 77); Parker does not notice them. There are also nearly 30 entries by Cosin in the main body of FC; many are corrections of errors made by Sancroft, but there are 10 minor alterations in the Marriage Service which are not derived from DB. Another group of 4 suggests that the ‘Form for the Baptizing of Adult Persons’ had not yet been projected; the word ‘persons’ is substituted for ‘children’ in the Baptism Service; and ‘A Catechisme’ is written in as a catch-word at the end of the service, for which Sancroft has substituted ‘A Forme’. One entry also reproduces the first draft of DB, and has to be altered by Sancroft. Why these 14 corrections were made here, and not in DB, remains unexplained. Some were accepted by Convocation, some were not. Parker only twice notes a different hand, and then fails to recognise it as Cosin's (op. cit., ccxl, ccxli.)