Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T11:43:16.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and Heresy in Italy: Anti-Heretical Crusades, Orders and Confraternities, 1200–1500

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

N. J. Housley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most important weapons in the armoury of the Church during its struggle with heresy in the later Middle Ages was the militant and outward-looking piety of the lay faithful. There were two main ways in which the Church could employ the religious zeal of the laity in the defence of the faith, especially during the critical battle with catharism in the thirteenth century. One was the issue of crusade indulgences and privileges to all who took up arms in, or otherwise contributed to, the struggle against the heretics and their protectors (in technical terms, their fautors). The crusading army which such a move could create was a powerful and relatively inexpensive instrument, but it had its disadvantages. The crusade against the Albigensians showed that it was very difficult to control in the field, while that against the Hussites demonstrated that its failure had serious effects on the enthusiasm of the faithful. The second way of employing lay piety was the establishment of permanent religious organisations, orders and confraternities, which would be at the service of the papal inquisition against heresy. In contrast to the temporary legal obligation of the crucesignatus, membership of such an organisation expressed a permanent commitment to the defence of the faith, a commitment rewarded only in articulo mortis by the grant of the plenary indulgence. My intention here is to examine some political aspects of both the use of the crusade indulgence, together with its associated privileges, and the functioning of anti-heretical orders and confraternities in Italy, mainly in the thirteenth century. Events in Italy deserve study for two reasons.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 193 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 H. C. Lea, A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, London 1888, ii. 191.

2 Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, ed. Mansi, G. D. et al. , Florence-Venice, 1759–98, xxii. cols. 231–3Google Scholar. Discussion of this difficult canon in Roscher, H., Papst Innocent III. und die Kreuzzüge, Göttingen 1969, 217–18Google Scholar.

3 For the crusade against heretics as a just war, see Riley-Smith, J. S. C., What were the Crusades?, London 1977, 25–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See, for example, Moore, R. I., The Origins of European Dissent, London 1977, 246–50Google Scholar.

5 Sacrorum conciliorum...collectio, xxii. cols. 986ff. See also Russell, F. H., The Just War in the Middle Ages, Cambridge 1975, 196–7Google Scholar.

6 Innocent in, ‘Opera omnia', in P.L., ccxvi. 710–14, esp. 714. But see also Roscher, Innocent III, 237.

7 Bullarium Ordinis Praedicatorum, ed. Ripoll, T., Rome 1729–40Google Scholar, i. 199–200.

8 Ibid., i. 249–50, 417–19, 466, ii. 24. See also i. 192–3, 326–7.

9 For the crusade against the cathars, see below, pp. 199–201. For the crusade against the followers of Fra Dolcino, see Bernard Gui,'De secta illorum qui se dicunt esse de ordine apostolorum', Rerum italicarum scriptores, N.S. (hereafter cited as RISNS), ed. G. Carducci et at., Città di Castello-Bologna, 1900–, ix5. 26–8.

10 Bullarium, i. 95.

11 See Paulus, N., Geschichte des Ablasses im Mittelalter vom Ursprunge bis zur Mitte des 14. Jahrhunderts, Paderborn 1922–3, ii. 45Google Scholar.

12 Bullarium, i. 417–19.

13 See below, pp. 207–8.

14 For the following pages I am indebted to the thorough and penetrating studies of Meersseman, G., ‘Études sur les anciennes confréries dominicaines, II. Les Confréries de Saint-Pierre Martyr’, Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum (hereafter cited as AFP), xxi (1951), 51–196Google Scholar, and ‘Études...IV. Les Milices de Jésus-Christ’, AFP, xxiii (1953), 275–308Google Scholar, esp. 293ff. both reprinted (in Italian translation) in his Ordo Fraternitatis. Confralemiti epietà dei laid nel medioevo, Rome 1977, ii. 754ff, iii. 1233ff.

15 Dictionnaire de droit canonique, IV, Paris 1949Google Scholar, cols. 128ff, exp. 143; Meersseman, ‘Études...IV', 285–93.

16 Meersseman, ‘Études... II', 57–9, 114–15.

17 See Bullarium, i. 209–11.

18 I follow Meersseman (Études... IV, 295) in describing the Militia as a religious order rather than a confraternity, despite the omission of the oath of chastity. For a different interpretation see Jordan, E., Les Origines de la domination angevine en Italic, Paris 1909, 364Google Scholar n. 1.

19 Bullarium, i. 25, vii. 10–13.

20 See Lambert, M. D., Medieval Heresy. Popular movements from Bogomil to Hus, London 1977. 138–41Google Scholar.

21 ‘Études...IV', 299.

22 The best account is still Jordan, E., L'Allemagne el l'Italic aux xiie et xiiie siècles, Paris 1939, 251–393Google Scholar. For the crusades, see my Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation (1979)Google Scholar, ‘The Angevin kings of Sicily, the papacy and the crusades, 1254–1343', passim.

23 Volpe, G., Movimenti religiosi e sette ereticali nella società medievah italiana secoli xi–xiv, Florence 1922, 127ffGoogle Scholar.

24 Full account in Davidsohn, R., Geschichte von Florenz, Berlin 1896–1912, iii. 290–309Google Scholar.

25 Documenti dell'antica costituzione del comunt di Firenze, ed. Santini, P., Florence 1895, 482–4.Google Scholar

26 Davidsohn, Geschichte, ii1, 303–4.'Der politische Hader wuchs mit dem Glaubensstreit in eins zusammen.'

27 Documenti, ed. Santini, 487–8.

28 Ibid., 488–90.

29 Ibid.

30 Davidsohn, Geschichte, ii1. 308.

31 Lea, Inquisition, ii. 223–4; Guiraud, J., Histoire de l'Inquisition au Moyen Âge, Paris 1935–8Google Scholar, ii. 447ff.

32 See Riley-Smith, What were the Crusades?, 25–8.

33 See, e.g., Lea, Inquisition, ii. 226, iii. 192.

34 See Jordan, Les Origines, 77–8. Cf. Manselli, R., ‘Ezzelino da Romano nella policica italiana del secolo xiii’, in Studi ezzeliniani, Rome 1963, 63–4Google Scholar.

35 Verci, G., Storia degli Ecelini, Bassano 1779, iii. no. clxxxiii, 309–12Google Scholar.

36 Bullarium, i. 192–3, 212–13, 228–30, 247–50; Jordan, Les Origines, 93.

37 Bullarium, i. 250.

38 Ibid., 326–7, 382–5; Verci, Storia degli Ecelini, iii. no. ccxxv, 383–4; Jordan, Les Origines, 94ff.

39 This was an argument frequently and forcefully employed in the justification of crusades against Christian lay powers. See my ‘Angevin kings of Sicily', chap. 2.

40 Bullarium, vii. 11, and cf. the longer description of the Order's aims, ibid., 12.

41 Urban, Pope IV, Registres, ed. Guiraud, J., Paris 1899–1958, no. 659Google Scholar.

42 Salimbene de Adam, Cronica, M.G.H. Ss, xxxii. 371–5.

43 Ibid., 375.

44 Statuta communis Parmae, Parma 1855, i. 464Google Scholar. See also Chronicon parmense, RISNS, ix9, 24–5.

45 Statuta, i. 468.

46 Ibid., 471–2, 478. See also 467–8, 469, 472, 480.

47 Iregistri delta cancelleria angioina ricostruiti, ed. Filangieri, R. et al. , Naples 1950–, ii. Reg. 8, no. 273Google Scholar.

48 Its name was derived from the cross which members displayed on their clothing or arms. See I registri, loc. cit., and Chronicon parmense, p. 24.

49 See Codex diplomaticus Cremonae, ed. Astegiano, L., Cremona 1895–8, ii. 308ffGoogle Scholar; Jordan, L'Allemagne et l'Italic, 387–9.

50 Codex diplomatics Cremonae, i. 340–1.

51 ‘Annales placentini gibellini', M.G.H., xviii. 520; Codex diplomatics Cremonae, ii. 311.

52 Ada imperil selecta, ed. Bohmer, J. F., Innsbruck 1870, no. 984Google Scholar.

53 Ibid.

54 Statuta communis Parmae, ii. 32, 34–5, 41, 51, 201. For the Guelf party at Florence see Heers, J., Parties and Political Life in the Medieval West, Amsterdam 1977, 137ffGoogle Scholar.

55 Chronicon parmense, 45.

56 Ibid., 52, 63–4; Hyde, J. K., Society and Politics in Medieval Italy. The evolution of the civil life, 1000–1350, London 1973, 135Google Scholar.

57 See Federici, D. M., Istoria de' Cavalicri gaudenti, Venice 1787, Codex diplomaticus, no. xviii, pp. 16–28Google Scholar.

58 Salimbene, 467–9. The new order had red stars in the top right- and left-hand corners of the cross. See Federici, Istoria, Codex diplomatics, p. 20, and illustration in main text, p. 94.

59 Cf. Jordan's apt description of the Militia as ‘une curieuse tentative pour retourner, contre les ennemis intérieurs de la chrétienté, une idée qui avail si brillamment réussi contre ses ennemis extérieurs'. Les Origines, 365.

60 Inferno, xxiii. 82–108.

61 Salimbene, 468. For the order's character and history, see Federici, Istoria, passim.

62 Bowsky, W. M., The Finance of the Commune of Siena, 1287–1355, Oxford 1970, 81–2Google Scholar, 105–6; Meersseman, ‘Études...IV, 301. For communal legislation against confraternities see Becker, M. B., ‘The Florentine territorial state and civic humanism in the early Renaissance’, in Rubinstein, N. (ed.), Florentine Studies, London 1968, 111–12Google Scholar, 122.

63 See, e.g., the series of articles by Bock, F. in Quellen and Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken, xxvi (1935–6)Google Scholar and xxvii (1936–7), and AFP, vi (1936) and vii (1937).

64 Chronicon parmense, 180–1; Meersseman, ‘Études...II', 69.

65 Good account in Partner, P., The Lands of St Peter. The papal state in the Middle Ages and the early Renaissance, London 1972, 313Google Scholarff.

66 Meersseman, ‘Études...II', 71ff, 141–61, esp. 146–7 (the rite for taking the cross).

67 Monti, G. M., Le Confraternite medievali dell'alta e media Italia, Venice 1927, ii. 76Google Scholar.

68 See Hyde, Society and Politics, 8, 54, 80, 132ff, and passim.

69 For the Bigallo, see Forsckungen zur älteren Gesckichte von Florenz, comp. Davidsohn, R., Berlin 1896–1908, iv. 426–8Google Scholar.