Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2011
The Association for the Promotion of the Unity of Christendom (APUC), a joint Anglican/Roman Catholic association of prayer, was founded on 8 September 1857. Seven years later it was condemned by the Holy See for encouraging indifferentism by claiming that the Roman, Greek and Anglican Churches had an equal right to the title ‘Catholic’, the distinctive mark of a true Church. The papal rescript in which the condemnation was contained, Ad omnes Angliae episcopos, also offered a precise definition of the nature of the ‘Catholic Church’ which, in effect, excluded all possible schemes for reunion between the Churches except on the basis of unconditional submission to the Holy See.
1 Messenger, E. C., Rome and Reunion : a collection of papal pronouncements, London 1934, 93.Google Scholar
2 Dulles, A., The Catholicity of the Church, Oxford 1985, 21.Google Scholar
3 The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council had declared that belief in baptismal regeneration was not an essential belief of the Church of England.
4 See his letter to L'Univers, 5 Mar. 1841.
5 See his letter to L'Univers, 17 Oct. 1841.
6 Phillipps to Bloxam, 25 Jan. 1841, Archive of Magdalen College, Oxford, MS 459.
7 Brandreth, H. R. T., Dr Lee of Lambeth, London 1951, 81.Google Scholar
8 Prospectus of the APUC, PHA.
9 Brandreth, op. cit. 83–6.
10 PHA.
11 Champ, J. F., ‘Priesthood and politics in the nineteenth century: the turbulent career of Thomas McDonnell’, Ricusant History xviii (1987), 293.Google Scholar
12 Union Review vii (1869).
13 Through the pages of L'Univers.
14 Newman to Phillipps, 1 July 1857, Dessain, C. S. et al. (eds), The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman xviii, London-Oxford 1961-, 70–1.Google Scholar
15 Purcell, E. S., The Life and Letters of Ambrose Phillipps de Lisle, London 1900, i. 370Google Scholar
16 Newman, to Phillipps, , 3 Mar. 1866, Letters and Diaries, xxii. 170–2.Google Scholar
17 PHA.
18 Lacey, A. C., The Second Spring in Chamwood Forest, Loughborough 1985, 23.Google Scholar
19 Ibid. 63–4.
20 Ibid. 64.
21 Brandreth, Lee, 82.
22 Lacey, op. cit. 65.
23 Union Review ii (1864), 101.
24 Ffoulkes to Grant, 17, 23 and 29 Dec. 1862, AAS, Grant Papers.
25 Union Review ii (1864), 283.
26 Ibid. 425–6.
27 Union Review iv (1866), 49–81.
28 Lee, F. G. (ed.), Sermons on the Reunion of Christendom, London 1864, 80–1.Google Scholar
29 Ibid. 91.
30 The Oblates of St Charles, the society of secular priests established in England by Manning, came under particularly harsh attack since the majority of them were neo-Ultramontane converts.
31 Ullathorne to Propaganda, 26 Apr. 1864, SCPF, 17.
32 Ullathorne to Propaganda, 24 May 1864, SCPF, 17.
33 Ullathorne to ?, n.d., The Letters of Archbishop Ullathorne, ed. Nuns of Stone, Stone 1892, 155–6.
34 Messenger, Rome and Reunion, 95.
35 Ward, W., The Life and Times of Cardinal Wiseman, London 1897, ii. 489.Google Scholar
36 Ullathorne to Talbot, 17 Dec. 1865, Archive of the Venerable English College, Rome, Talbot Papers.
37 Leslie, S., ‘Some Birmingham bygones’, Dublin Review clxvi (1920), 210.Google Scholar
38 Phillipps to Wiseman, 16 Nov. 1864, AAW, R79/16/38.
39 Wiseman to Phillipps, Nov. 1864, AAS, Searle Papers.
40 Phillipps to Wiseman, 7 Dec. 1864, AAW, R79/16/38.
41 Wiseman to Phillipps, 25 Oct. 1843, AAW, R79/16/38.
42 On a visit to Rome in 1847 to discuss arrangements for the restoration of a Catholic hierarchy in England, Wiseman found himself being quizzed as to why conversions had not been more numerous, Gwynn, D., The Second Spring, 1818–1852, London 1943, 177.Google Scholar
43 Phillipps to Propaganda, 7 June 1857, SCPF, 14.
44 Ward, , Wiseman, ii. 479–88.Google Scholar
45 Ibid. 489.
46 Wiseman to Propaganda, 24 Dec 1857, SCPF, 14.
47 Phillipps to Propaganda, 31 Aug. 1857, SCPF, 14.
48 Gray, R., Cardinal Manning: a biography, London 1985, 211.Google Scholar
49 Manning to Propaganda, 7 May 1864, SCPF, 17.
50 Manning to Propaganda, 10 June 1864, SCPF, 17.
51 Lee, , Brandreth, 77.Google Scholar
52 Ward, , Wiseman, ii. 491.Google Scholar
53 Manning to Propaganda, 3 Dec. 1864, SCPF, 17.
54 Leslie, S., Herny Edward Manning: his life and labours, London 1921, 176.Google Scholar
55 Union Review iii (1965), 481.
56 Purcell, , Phillipps, i. 404.Google Scholar
57 Messenger, Rome and Reunion, 95–7.
58 Purcell, E. S., The Lift of Cardinal Manning, Arabishop of Westminster, London 1896, ii. 281.Google Scholar
59 Messenger, Rome and Reunion, 96.
60 Purcell, op. cit. ii. 282.
61 Ibid. 284.
62 Ibid. 282.
63 Purcell, , Phillipps, i. 407.Google Scholar
64 Purcell, , Manning, ii. 284.Google Scholar
65 Gray, , Manning, 152.Google Scholar Unfortunately there are several versions of this story in which the principal character varies.
66 Weekly Register, 12 Nov. 1864.
67 Weekly Register, 19 Nov. 1864.
68 Purcell, , Phillipps, i. 400.Google Scholar
69 Ibid. 402.
70 Obituary in the Reunion Magazine i (1877–1879), 334.
71 Union Review vii (1869), 73–4.
72 Newman, to Pusey, , 19 Sept. 1868, Letters and Diaries, xxiv. 151–3.Google Scholar
73 Kenny, A., A Path from Rome, Oxford 1985, 163.Google Scholar
74 One might have expected the publication of Newman's Apologia in 1864, which was greeted with vociferous disapproval by the Ultramontanes, to have influenced their attitude to the APUC. However, I have come across no evidence to suggest that it did.
75 Bernard, and Pawley, Margaret, Rome and Canterbury Through Four Centuries: a study of the relations between the Church of Rome and the Anglican Churches, 1530–1981, London 1981, 276 and 287.Google Scholar
76 Newman, J. H., On Consulting the Faithful in Matins of Doctrine, London 1986 edn.Google Scholar
77 The Lamp xlvii (1894), 613.
