Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T00:37:24.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Economic Growth Before 1840: An Exploratory Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

George Rogers Taylor
George Rogers Taylor
Affiliation:
Amherst College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In developing the subject of this paper, “American Economic Growth before 1840,” I shall, relying for the most part on familiar materials, propose the hypothesis that economic growth per capita in the thirteen colonies of Britain in America advanced at a relatively rapid rate from about 1710 to 1775.1 shall also suggest that the level of living remained relatively low in these colonies as late as about 1710 and that for the new nation output per capita over the years 1775 to 1840 improved slowly if at all.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1964 , pp. 427 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 U. S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Hearings, Historical and Comparative Rates of Production, Productivity, and Prices,86th Cong., 1st Sess.,1959, pp. 277–78.Google Scholar

2 ibid., p. 278.

3 Greene, Evarts B. and Harrington, Virginia D., American Population before the Federal Census of 1790 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1932), p. 7Google Scholar; and U. S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1957 (Washington, D. C: Government Printing Office, 1960), p. 756.Google Scholar

4 Historical Statistics, p. 756; Greene and Harrington, American Population, p. 142.

5 The Planters of Colonial Virginia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1922), pp. 158–59.Google Scholar

6 Historical Statistics, p. 768.

7 Gray, Lewis C., History of Agriculture in the Southern United States (Washington, D. C.: Carnegie Institution, 1933), II, 1024.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., I, 293.

9 The History of South Carolina from its First Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808 (Charleston, S. C., 1809), I, 123.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., I, 114–18.

11 Government and Labor in Early America (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946), p. 45.Google Scholar

12 Transforming Traditional Agriculture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964), p. 16. See also ch. viii.Google Scholar

13 Cities in Revolt (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1955), pp. 216–17.Google Scholar

14 Famie, D. A., “The Commercial Empire of the Atlantic, 1607–1783,” Economic History Review, 2d Series, XV, No. 2 (Dec. 1962), 214.Google Scholar

15 Gray, , History of Agriculture, II, 589–99, 1022–24Google Scholar; Nettels, Curtis P., The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962), pp. 49–51Google Scholar; Low, W. A., “The Fanner in Post-Revolutionary Virginia,” Agricultural History, XXV (July 1951), 122–27.Google Scholar

16 Bridenbaugh, Cities in Revolt, p. 216.

17 Historical Statistics, pp. 7 and 14; Bridenbaugh, Cities in Revolt, pp. 216–17; Bureau of the Census, Century of Population Growth, p. 11. Bridenbaugh's estimates for 1775 seem high; but even so, urban population growth clearly lagged in this period. For a description of economic conditions during the war and postwar years, see Nettels, Emergence of a National Economy, chs. ii–iv.

18 Martin, Robert F., National Income in the United States, 1799–1938 (National Industrial Conference Board Studies, No. 241 [New York: NICB, 1939]), pp. 8–12Google Scholar; Parker, William N. and Whartenby, Franklee, “The Growth of Output Before 1840,” in Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century (Studies in Income and Wealth, XXIV [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960]), 191.Google Scholar

19 “Long Term Changes in the National Income of the United States of America since 1870,” in Income and Wealth of the United States (Cambridge [Engl.]: Bowes and Bowes, 1952), pp. 221–39.Google Scholar

20 “The Growth of Output Before 1840,” pp. 191–212.

21 “Early National Income Estimates of the U. S.,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, IX (Apr. 1961), 387–96.Google Scholar

22 “Farm Gross Product and Gross Investment in the Nineteenth Century,” in Trends in the American Economy, pp. 258–60.

23 If the quality of the northern farmers contributed to productivity in the colonial period, why, it may be asked, was it not important later? The answer seems clear enough: the most ambitious and able gave up the struggle against overwhelming odds and moved to the cities or to the frontier.

24 Computed from Historical Statistics, pp. 7 and 538.

25 North, Douglass C., The Economic Growth of the United States (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1961), pp. 250–54.Google Scholar

26 Gallman, Robert E., “Estimates of American National Product Made before the Civil War,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, IX (Apr. 1961), 399–401Google Scholar; Goldsmith, Hearings before the Joint Economic Committee, p. 278; and Kuznets, Simon, “Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, V (Oct. 1956), 24–25.Google Scholar