Article contents
The Efficiency of Britain's “Silly Little Bobtailed” Coal Wagons: A Comment on Van Vleck
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022050700024153/resource/name/firstPage-S0022050700024153a.jpg)
- Type
- Notes and Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999
References
REFERENCES
Aldcroft, D. H. “The Efficiency and Enterprise of British Railways, 1870–1914.” Explorations in Economic History, 2nd Ser., 5 (1968): 158–74.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99 (03 1989): 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, P. S.. The Railwaymen: The History of the National Union of Railwaymen. London: Allen & Unwin, 1963.Google Scholar
Burtt, P.The Principal Factors in Freight Train Operating. London: Allen & Unwin, 1923.Google Scholar
Cain, P. J. “Private Enterprise or Public Utility? Output, Pricing, and Investment on English and Welsh Railways, 1870–1914.” Journal of Transport History, 3rd Ser., 1 (1980): 9–28.Google Scholar
Church, R. A.The History of the British Coal Industry. Volume 3. 1830–1913: Victorian Pre-eminence. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986Google Scholar
David, Paul A. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75, no. 2 (1985): 332–37.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph R., and Garth, Saloner. “Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation.” Rand Journal of Economics 16, no. 1 (1985): 70–83.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph R., and Garth, Saloner. “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation.” American Economic Review 76, no. 5 (1986): 940–55.Google Scholar
Munby, D. L., and A. H., WatsonInland Transport Statistics. Great Britain 1900–1970, Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.Google Scholar
Parkhouse, S. E. “Railway Freight Rolling Stock.” Journal of the Institute of Transport 24, no.6 (1951): 211–18, 251.Google Scholar
Political and Economic Planning, Report on the British Coal Industry. London: PEP, 1936.Google Scholar
Railway Gazette, various dates.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter. “The Growth of Road Haulage in Britain, 1921–58: An Estimate.” Journal of Transport History 19, no. 2 (1998): 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Peter. “Technical and Institutional Interrelatedness in British Rail Coal Haulage: A Reappraisal.” University of Portsmouth Department of Economics Discussion Paper no. 109 (1998).Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Parliament. Departmental Committee on Railway Accounts and Statistical Returns. Cd 5052. 1910.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Parliament. Royal Commission on the Coal Industry. Minutes of Evidence, Vol. I. Cd 359. 1919.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Parliament. Royal Commission on the Coal Industry (1925). Report With Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. Cd. 2600. 1926.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Parliament. Standing Committee on Mineral Transport. First Report, Cd. 3420. 1929.Google Scholar
United Kingdom. Parliament. Modem Records Centre. Transport and General Workers Union papers, Mss 126. Warwick.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va “Reassessing Technological Backwardness: Absolving the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Car.” Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 1993.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va “Delivering Coal by Road and Rail in Britain: the Efficiency of the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Wagons.” This JOURNAL 57, no. 1 (1997): 139–60.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by