Article contents
In Defense (Again) of “Silly Little Bobtailed” Coal Wagons: Reply to Peter Scott
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022050700024165/resource/name/firstPage-S0022050700024165a.jpg)
- Type
- Notes and Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999
References
REFERENCES
Liebowitz, S. J., and Margolis, Stephen. “Path-Dependence, Lock-In, and History.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 11, no. 1 (1995): 205–26.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter. “The Efficiency of Britain's Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Wagons: A Comment on Van Vleck.” This JOURNAL 59, no. 4 (1999): 1072–80.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va. “Delivering Coal by Road and Rail in Britain: The Efficiency of the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Wagons.” This JOURNAL 57, no. 1 (1997): 139–60.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va “Reassessing Technological Backwardness: Absolving the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Car.” Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 1993.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by