¹ Carey, Henry C., The Past, the Present, and the Future (Philadelphia, 1859), p. 229.Google Scholar

² Block, Camille, L'assistance et I'étal en France á la veille de la Révolution (Paris: Alphonse Picard, 1908), p. 5.Google Scholar

³ Clark, G. N., The Wealth of England from 1496 to 1760 (London: Oxford University Press, 1946), pp. 192–93.Google Scholar

⁴ Ashton, T. S., An Economic History of England: The 18th Century (London: Methuen, 1955), pp. 22–23Google Scholar ; Henri See, La France èconomique et sociale au xviii^e sidcle (Paris: Armand Colin, 1946), p. 36 and passimGoogle Scholar ; Levasseur, E., Histoire des classes ouvrieres avant 1789 (Paris: Rousseau, 1901), II, 849 ffGoogle Scholar . Investigations carried out in Reims in the 1780's claimed that two thirds of the population lived from day to day and were often in a state of “absolute distress.” See Laurent, Gustave, “Un conventionel ouvrier: Jean-Baptiste Armonville,” Annales historiques de la revolution francaise, I (05 1924), 218Google Scholar.

⁵ Sidney and Beatrice Webb, English Poor Law History (London: Longmans, Green and Company, 1927), I, 396.Google Scholar

⁶ For the development of poor relief measures, ibid.; Ashley, W. J., An Introduction to English Economic History and Theory (New York, 1893), Vol. II, ch. vGoogle Scholar ; Schweinitz, Karl de, England's Road to Social Security (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1943)Google Scholar ; Marshall, Dorothy, The English Poor in the Eighteenth Century (London: George Routledge, 1926)Google Scholar ; Balch, E. G., “Public Assistance of the Poor in France,” Publication of the American Economic Association, Vol. VIII (1893), Nos. 4–5Google Scholar ; Lallemand, L., Histoire de la charite (4 vols.; Paris: Picard, 1912)Google Scholar ; Cole, C. W., Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism (2 vols.; New York: Columbia University Press, 1939)Google Scholar.

⁷ French Predecessors of Malthus (Durham: Duke University Press, 1942), p. 20.Google Scholar

⁸ Schumpeter, J. A., History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1954), p. 147.Google Scholar

⁹ Mandeville, Bernard, “An Essay on Charity and Charity-Schools,” in The Fable of the Bees (, Kaye ed.; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924), I, 287.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Furniss, E. S., The Position of the Laborer in a System of Nationalism (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920)Google Scholar , ch. vi, calls this the “Doctrine of the Utility of Poverty.”

¹¹ Mandeville, I, 287.

¹² See Hecksher, E. F., Mercantilism (trans. Shapiro, M.; London: Allen & Unwin, 1934), II, 24Google Scholar ; Schumpeter, p. 251.

¹³ Brentano, L., Hours and Wages in Relation to Production (trans. , Arnold; London, 1894), pp. 2–3Google Scholar ; Johnson, E. A. J., Predecessors of Adam Smith (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1937), p. 283Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Cited in Fumiss, p. 118.

¹⁵ Cited in Hauser, H., La pensie et faction Sconomique du cardinal de Richelieu (Paris: Presses Universitaires, 1944), p. 145.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See for instance Gregory, T. E., “The Economics of Employment in England, 1660-1773,” Economica, I (1921), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Koulischer, J., “La grande Industrie aux xviie et xviiie siecles: France, Alle-magne, Russie,” Annales d'histoire Sconomique et sociale, Vol. III, No. 1 (01 1931).Google Scholar

¹⁸ For some observations on comparative social thought on this subject, see Bufill, Carlos Marti, Tratado Comparado de Seguridad Social (Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo, 1951), p. 47 and passim.Google Scholar

¹⁹ For an interpretation of the Speenhamland system along these lines, see Polanyi, K., The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957), ch. vii.Google Scholar

²⁰ The Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library, 1937), pp. 135–40.Google Scholar

²¹ Redford, A., Labour Migration in England, 1800-1850 (Manchester: University Press, 1926), p. 77.Google Scholar

²² For an opposing view, see Blaug, M., “The Myth of the Ol d Poor Law and the Making of the New,” The Journal of Economic History, XXIII (06 1963), pp. 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²³ Malthus, Thomas, Essay on the Principle of Population (6th ed.; London, 1826), II, 339.Google Scholar

²⁴ Malthus, First Essay on Population (1798; reprinted, London: MacMillan and Company, 1926), pp. 83–87.Google Scholar

²⁵ Bonar, James, Malthus and His Work (London, 1885), p. 304Google Scholar ; , Malthus, Principle of Population (1826), p. 339Google Scholar.

²⁶ A Treatise on Political Economy (trans, from 4th ed.; Philadelphia, 1836), p. 438.Google Scholar

²⁷ Cited by Spengler, J. J., “French Population Theory since 1800,” Journal of Political Economy, XLIX (10 1936), 558.Google Scholar

²⁸ Bastiat, F., Harmonies Economiques in Oeuvres Completes (Paris, 1870), VI 530.Google Scholar

²⁹ Cited in Schaller, F., Vn aspect du nouveau courant social (Neuchatel: Baconniere, 1950), p. 49.Google Scholar

³⁰ Woodroofe, K., From Chanty to Social Work (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962), p. 92.Google Scholar

³¹ Devine, E. T., The Principles of Relief (New York: MacMillan, 1914), pp. 291–93.Google Scholar

³² Woodroofe, pp. 94 ff; Bremner, R. H., From the Depths (New York: New York University Press, 1956), chs. iv and vGoogle Scholar ; Bruno, F. J., Trends in Social Work (New York: Columbia University Press, 1957), passimGoogle Scholar.

³⁴ Hofstadter, R., Social Darwinism in American Thought 1860-1915 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1945), ch. iGoogle Scholar ; Fine, S., Laissez-Faire and the General Welfare State (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1956), ch. iiiGoogle Scholar.

³⁴ Social Statics (London, 1868), pp. 353–54.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid., p. 355; see also his Man Versus the State (1892; reprinted, Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton Printers, 1946), pp. 24 ff.Google Scholar

³⁶ “The Concentration of Wealth: Its Economic Justification,” in Essays of William Graham Sumner (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1934), II, 172Google Scholar ; “The Abolition of Poverty,” ibid., I, 108; also, What Social Classes Owe to Each Other (New York, 1885), p. 21Google Scholar.

³⁷ See for instance Koster, J., “Der rheinische Fruehliberalismus und die soziale Frage,” Historische Studien, No. 342 (1938)Google Scholar ; Hansemann, David, “Denkschrift iiber Preussens Lage und Politik” (1840)Google Scholar , and Harkort, Friedrich, “Bemerkungen iiber die Hindernisse der Zivilisation und Emancipation der unteren Klassen” (1844)Google Scholar , in Schrapler, E. (ed.), Quellen zur Geschichte der sozialen Frage in Deutschmd, 1800-1870 (2d ed.; Goettingen: Musterschmidt, 1960), Vol. IGoogle Scholar . T. von Laue has noted the lack of individualism in German liberalism; see “The Beginning of Social In surance in Imperial Germany” (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 1944), p. xxvGoogle Scholar.

³⁸ See Baxa, J., “Die Wirtschaftlichen Ansichten von Joseph Maria von Radovitz,” Jahrbuch fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, Vol. 139, No. 2 (1933), pp. 188–210Google Scholar ; Stein, Lorenz, “Das Konigtum, die Republik, und die Souveranitat,” in Schrapler, Vol. IGoogle Scholar.

³⁹ Hellwig, Fritz, Carl Ferdinand Freiherr von Stumm-Halberg (Heidelberg: Westmarck, 1936), p. 189.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Bismarck liked to recall that young Frederick the Great once said: “Quand je serai Roi, je serai un vrai roi des gueux”; Werke, Gesammelten, ed. Wilhelm Schtis-sler (Berlin: Stollberg, 1929), XII, 360Google Scholar . See also Luetge, F., “Die Grundprinzipien der Bismarckschen Sozialpolitik,” Jahrbuch fiir Nationalb konomie und Statistik, Vol. 134, No. 1 (1931)Google Scholar.

⁴¹ Cited in Dawson, W. H., Social Insurance in Germany, 1883-1911 (London: Fisher Unwin, 1912), p. 16Google Scholar ; Schiissler, XII, 270.

⁴² Dawson, ch. ix; also his Evolution of Modern Germany (London: Fisher Unwin, 1908), pp. 155–57.Google Scholar

⁴³ Schwedtman, F. C. and Emery, J. A., Accident Prevention and Relief (New York: National Association of Manufacturers, 1911), passim.Google Scholar

⁴² Schmoller, G., Die soziale Frage (Munich: Duncker and Humblot, 1918), p. 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁵ , Zeller, “Der Wirkungskreis des Par. 12 des Invaliditats-und Alters-Versicherungs-gesetz zu Gunsten der Krankenversicherung,” Die Invaliditats-und Alters-Versicherung im deutschen Reiche, VI (1895-1896), 82–83.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ The Works of Theodore Roosevelt (National ed.; New York: Scribner, 1926), XVII, 266 ff.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Institutional Economics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1959), II, 857.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ “A Reconstruction Health Program,” The Survey (09 6, 1919), p. 798.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Steigerwalt, Albert K., The National Association of Manufacturers: A Study in Business Leadership, 1895-1914, (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Dean-Hicks, 1964)Google Scholar ; Taylor, A. G., Labor Policies of the National Association of Manufacturers, University of Illinois Studies in the Social Sciences, Vol. XV, No. 1 (1927), pp. 148–49Google Scholar ; Bonnett, C. E., Employers Associations in the United States (New York: MacMillan, 1922), pp. 120, 125, 253Google Scholar.

⁵⁰ “Sickness Insurance,” American Labor Legislation Review, III, No. 2, (06 1913), 162–71.Google Scholar

⁵¹ National Vitality: Its Wastes and Conservation (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1910).Google Scholar

⁵² “The Need for Health Insurance,” American Labor Legislation Review, VII, No. 1 (03 1917), 17.Google Scholar

⁵³ Rimlinger, G. V., “Social Security, Incentives, and Controls in the U. S. and U. S. S. R.,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. IV, No. 1 (11 1961)Google Scholar ; “The Trade Union in Soviet Social Insurance : Historical Development and Present Functions,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. XIV, No. 3 (04 1961)Google Scholar ; Schwarz, S. M., Labor in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1952), ch. viiGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁴ Gintsburg, L. la., Trudovoi stazh rabochikhi sluzhashchikh (Moscow, 1958), p. 66.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Kozlov, I., “I vpred uluchshat delo gosudarstvennogo sotsial nogo strakho-vaniia,” Okhrana truda i sotsial noe strakhovanie (07 1958), p. 54.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Krasnopolskii, A. S., Osnovnye printsipy Sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial nogo strakhovaniia (Moscow, 1951), p. 54.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ For a theoretical analysis of productivity effects, see Rimlinger, Gaston V., “A Theoretical Integration of Wages and Social Insurance,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXVII (08 1963), 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁸ “The Economic Costs of Absenteeism,” Progress in Health Services (Health Information Foundation), Vol. XII, No. 2 (03-04 1963).Google Scholar