Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:15:14.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alexander Gerschenkron: A Personal and Fond Recollection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Memorial Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1979

References

1 A different version of this essay was delivered at a Memorial Service for Alexander Gerschenkron at Harvard University on December 2, 1978.

2 Those .who knew Gerschenkron as a young man usually called him Shura—a Russian diminutive for Alexander.

3 Rosovsky, Henry, ed., Industrialization in Two Systems (New York, 1966Google Scholar).

4 Aside from Bread and Democracy, Gerschenkron's major books were Economic Relations with USSR (1945); A Dollar Index of Soviet Machinery Output (1951); Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (1962); Continuity in History and Other Essays (1968); Europe in the Russian Mirror (1970); Mercator Gloriosus and Other Essays (1973); and An Economic Spurt That Failed (1977).

5 Distinguished Fellow of the American Economic Association; President of the Economic History Association; Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, and the Swedish Academy; Corresponding member of the British Academy; Honorary Doctor of Letters, Oxford University, etc.

6 See Hoffmann, Walther G., The Growth of Industrial Economies (Manchester, 1958)Google Scholar, original German version published in 1931; and Veblen, Thorstein, Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution (New York, 1918Google Scholar).

7 Gerschenkron's, original statement is contained in “Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective,“” in Hoselitz, Bert F., ed., The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas (Chicago, 1952Google Scholar).

8 Although Simon Kuznets made enormous contributions to our field, he is, I believe, more properly classified as an economist.