Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:55:58.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic History of Modern Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

H. J. Habakkuk
H. J. Habakkuk
Affiliation:
Oxford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is now a rough consensus of opinion among English economic historians about the broad chronology of English population history. According to this chronology there were three main phases of rapid growth. The first occurred in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and was brought to an end by a marked fall in population in the fourteenth century. The second phase occupied most of the sixteenth century and the early seventeendi, after which there was some slowing down in the later seventeenth century and possibly an absolute check in the 1720's and 1730's. And finally tliere was the sustained cumulative increase that started in the later eighteenth century.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1958 , pp. 486 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Postan, M. M., “Some Economic Evidence of Declining Population in the Later Middle Ages,” Economic History Review, 2d ser., II (1950), 236Google Scholar.

2 Brown, E. H. Phelps and Hopkins, Sheila V., “Wage-rates and Prices: Evidence for Population Pressure in the Sixteenth Century,” Economica, n. s., XXIV (1957), 289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 F. J. Fisher, “The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: The Dark Ages in English Economic History,” ibid., p. 16.

4 Coleman, D. C., “Labour in the English Economy of the Seventeenth Century,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d ser., VIII (1956), 284–87Google Scholar.

5 G. E. Mingay, “The Agricultural Depression, 1730-1750,” ibid., pp. 335-36; J. D. Chambers, “Enclosure and Labour Supply in the Industrial Revolution,” ibid., V (1953), 319-43.

6 Thomas, Brinley, Migration and Economic Growth (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1954). P. 157Google Scholar.

7 Brownlee, J., “The History of the Birth and Death Rates in England and Wales Taken as a Whole, from 1750 to the Present Time,” Public Health, XXIX (1915-1916), 228–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “The Health of London in the Eighteenth Century,” Proceedings of the Royal Medical Society, XVIII (1925), Section of Epidemology and State Medicine, 73-85Google Scholar; Griffith, G. Talbot, Population Problems of the Age of Malthus (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1926)Google Scholar, ch. i and ii; “Rickman's Second Series of Eighteenth-Century Population Figures,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, XCII (1929), 256–63Google Scholar.

8 The statistics are extensively discussed by Krause, J. T., “Changes in English Fertility and Mortality,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d ser., XI (1958), 57–70Google Scholar.

9 The figure for the later seventeenth century is the revision by D. V. Glass of Gregory King's estimate in “Gregory King's Estimate of the Population of England and Wales, 1695,” Population Studies, III (1949–1950), 338Google Scholar. See also, by the same author, “Gregory King and the Population of England and Wales at the End of the Seventeenth Century,” Eugenics Review, XXXVII (1945-1946), 170–83Google Scholar.

10 Chambers, J. D., The Vale of Trent, 1670-1800 (Ec. Hist. Rev., Supplement 3; London, 1957).Google ScholarEversley, D. E. C., “A Survey of Population in an Area of Worcestershire from 1660-1850,” Population Studies, X (1956-1957), 230–53Google Scholar.

11 T. H. Hollingsworth, “A Demographic Study of the British Ducal Families,” ibid., XI (1957), 1-26.

12 There have been many studies of Malthus in recent years, thus McCleary, G. F., The Malthusian Population Theory (London, Faber and Faber, 1953)Google Scholar;Glass, D. V., ed., Introduction to Malthus (London, Watts, 1953)Google Scholar; Peacock, A. T., “The Theory of Population and Modern Economic Analysis,” Population Studies, VI (1952-1953), 114–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar, VII (1953-54), 227-34.

13 Russell, J. C., British Medieval Population (Albuquerque, N. Mex., University of New Mexico Press, 1948)Google Scholar.

14 Harley, J. B., “Population Trends and Agricultural Developments from the Warwickshire Hundred Rolls of 1279,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d ser., XI (1958), 8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Marshall, T. H., “The Population Problem During the Industrial Revolution,” Economic History (Supplement to the Economic Journal), I (1926–1929)Google Scholar [reprinted in Carus-Wilson, E. M., ed., Essays in Economic History (London, Arnold, 1954)], 434, 445, 452Google Scholar.

16 Connell, K. H., The Population of Ireland, 1750-184; (Oxford, 1950)Google Scholar; “Land and Population in Ireland,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d ser., II (1950), 278–89Google Scholar; “Some Unsettled Problems in English and Irish Population History, 1750-1845,” Irish Historical Studies, VII (1951), 225-34Google Scholar; Habakkuk, H. J., “English Population in the Eighteenth Century,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d ser., VI (1953). 117–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 McKeown, T. and Brown, R. G., “Medical Evidence Related to the English Population Changes in the Eighteenth Century,” Population Studies, IX (1955), 119–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Per Goran Ohlin, “The Positive and Preventive Check: A Study of the Rate of Growth of Pre-Industrial Populations” (unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University), ch. iii.

19 Frith, Brian, ed., Gloucestershire Marriage Allegations, 1637–1680 (Bristol and Gloucestershire Arch. Soc., 1954). See the review of this work byGoogle ScholarChambers, D. J. in the Ec, Hist. Rev., 2d ser., IX (1956), 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Redford, A., Labour Migration in England (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1926), pp. 63 SGoogle Scholar.

21 , Krause, “English Fertility,” pp. 67–9Google Scholar.

22 Glass, D. V., “Changes in Fertility in England and Wales, 1851-1931,” in Hogben, L., ed., Political Arithmetic: Symposium on Population Studies (London, Allen & Unwin, 1937), pp. 173–94Google Scholar.

23 Lorimer, F., Culture and Human Fertility (UNESCO, 1954), pp. 209–11Google Scholar.

24 , Griffith, Population Problems in the Age of Mdthus; M. C. Buer, Health, Wealth and Population in the Early Days of the Industrial Revolution (London, Routlcdge, 1926)Google Scholar.

25 In 1953 I suggested that the fall in the death rate in the 1780's–or such fall as might remain after the imperfections of the statistics had been taken account of-might simply be due to a change in age composition because of an earlier rise in birth rates. This was an ill-considered suggestion since age at death varies so widely that only the effect of implausibly great changes in age composition would be perceptible.

26 Ashton, T. S., “The Standard of Life of the Workers in England, 1790–1830,” in Hayek, F. A., ed., Capitalism and the Historians (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1954), pp. 127–59.Google ScholarHobsbawm, E. J., “The British Standard of Living, 1790-1850,” Ec. Hist. Rev., 2d scr., X (1957), 46–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Farr, William, “The Influence of Scarcities and of the High Price of Wheat on the Mortality of the People of England,” Journal of the Statistical Society, IX (1846), 158–74Google Scholar.

28 George, D. M., “The Increase of Population in the Eighteenth Century as Illustrated by London,” Economic Journal, XXII (1908), 325Google Scholar.

29 The study of a single region cannot of course provide conclusive proof that pure epidemics were more damaging than dearths, simply because the geographical incidence of the former was more random and localized than that of the latter. See Milne, , A Treatise on the Valuation of Annuities (London, 1812), II, £461Google Scholar.

30 Utterström, G., “Some Population Problems in Pre-Industrial Sweden, Scandinavian Economic History Review, II (1954), 103–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Climatic Fluctuations and Population Problems in Early Modern History,” ibid., III (1955), 3-47.

31 Helleiner, Karl F., “The Vital Revolution Reconsidered,” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, XXIII (1957), 7Google Scholar.