Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T09:29:13.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional Transplant and Cultural Proximity: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Prussia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2019

Giampaolo Lecce Open the ORCID record for Giampaolo Lecce [Opens in a new window]  and
Laura Ogliari
Giampaolo Lecce
Affiliation:
Giampaolo Lecce is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2 9747 AE Groningen. E-mail: G.Lecce@rug.nl
Laura Ogliari
Affiliation:
Laura Ogliari is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Economics Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM) of the University of Milan, Via Conservatorio 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. E-mail: laura.ogliari@unimi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents evidence that cultural proximity between the exporting and the receiving countries positively affects the adoption of new institutions and the resulting long-term economic outcomes. We obtain this result by combining new information on pre-Napoleonic principalities with county-level census data from nineteenth-century Prussia. We exploit a quasi-natural experiment generated by radical Napoleonic institutional reforms and the deeply rooted cultural heterogeneity across Prussian counties. We show that institutional reforms in counties that are culturally more similar to France, in terms of religious affiliation, generate better long-term economic performance.

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 1060 - 1093
Copyright
© The Economic History Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the co-editor Dan Bogart and two anonymous referees for comments that helped substantially to improve the article. We are grateful to Alberto Alesina, Maristella Botticini, Rosario Crinò, Francesco Giavazzi, and Guido Tabellini for their invaluable supervision; Tommaso Aquilante, Davide Cantoni, Michela Carlana, Italo Colantone, Laura Doval, James Fenske, Nicola Gennaioli, Gunes Gokmen, Carl Hallmann, Christopher Koenig, Eliana La Ferrara, Joel Mokyr, Tommaso Nannicini, Tommaso Orlando, Santiago Maria Perez Vincent, Nicola Persico, Pierre-Charles Pradier, Severine Toussaert, and Ludger Woessmann for their useful comments, suggestions, and fruitful discussions; and participants of the ASREC 2017, CESifo Workshop on Political Economy, Econometric Society European Winter Meeting 2016, Oxford Development Economic Workshop, and EDGE Jamboree, and seminars at Università Bocconi, Yale University, and Birmingham Business School. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Fondazione Cariplo, and Università Bocconi.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Cantoni, Davide, Johnson, Simon, and James, A. Robinson. “The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution.” American Economic Review 101, no. 7 (2011): 3286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Cantoni, Davide, Johnson, Simon, and James, A. Robinson. “From Ancien Regime to Capitalism: The Spread of the French Revolution as a Natural Experiment.” In Natural Experiments of History, edited by Diamond, Jared M. and Robinson, James A., 221–56. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 4 (2002): 1231–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Giuliano, Paola. “Culture and Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 53, no. 4 (2015): 898–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C. “The Great Divergence in European Wages and Prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War.” Explorations in Economic History 38, no. 4 (2001): 411–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua, and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvind, TT, and Stirton, Lindsay. “Explaining the Reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Legal Studies 30, no. 1 (2010): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sasha O., Cinnirella, Francesco, Hornung, Erik, and Woessmann, Ludger. “iPEHD–The ifo Prussian Economic History Database.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 47, no. 2 (2014): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sasha O., and Woessmann, Ludger. “Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, no. 2 (2009): 531–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina, and Richard, Jean-Francois. “Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect.” European Economic Review 47, no. 1 (2003a): 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina, and Richard, Jean-Francois. “The Transplant Effect.” American Journal of Comparative Law 51, no. 1 (2003b): 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broer, Michael. Europe under Napoleon, 1799–1815. London: Hodder Education Publisher, 1996.Google Scholar
Buggle, Johannes C. “Law and Social Capital: Evidence from the Code Napoleon in Germany.” European Economic Review 87 (2016): 148–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantoni, Davide. “Adopting a New Religion: The Case of Protestantism in 16th Century Germany.” Economic Journal 122, no. 560 (2012): 502–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantoni, Davide. “The Economic Effects of the Protestant Reformation: Testing the Weber Hypothesis in the German Lands.” Journal of the European Economic Association 13, no. 4 (2015): 561–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Christopher. Iron Kingdom. The Rise and Downfall of Prussia 1600–1947. London: Penguin Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Crosby, Margaret B. The Making of a German Constitution: A Slow Revolution. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
Dal Bó, Pedro, Foster, Andrew, and Putterman, Louis. “Institutions and Behavior: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Democracy.” American Economic Review 100, no. 5 (2010): 2205–29.Google Scholar
Donges, Alexander, Meier, Jean-Marie A, and Silva, Rui C.. (2017). “The Impact of Institutions on Innovation.” Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Philip G. The Rise of Prussia 1700–1830. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Ellis, Geoffrey. The Napoleonic Empire. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falck, Oliver, Heblich, Stephan, Lameli, Alfred, and Südekum, Jens. “Dialects, Cultural Identity, and Economic Exchange.” Journal of Urban Economics 72, nos. 2–3 (2012): 225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehrenbach, Elisabeth. Vom Ancien Regime zum Wiener Kongress. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernihough, Alan, and O’Rourke, Kevin H.. “Coal and the European Industrial Revolution.” NBER Working Paper No. 19802, Cambridge, MA, January 2014.Google Scholar
Fisher, Herbert A. L. Studies in Napoleonic Statesmanship: Germany. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1903.Google Scholar
Fisman, Raymond, Paravisini, Daniel, and Vig, Vikrant. “Cultural Proximity and Loan Outcomes.” American Economic Review 107, no. 2 (2017): 457–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, Patrick R., Hammel, Eugene A., and Lee, Ronald D.. “Fertility Decline in Prussia: Estimating Influences on Supply, Demand, and Degree of Control.” Demography 31, no. 2 (1994): 347–73.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded, Özak, Ömer, and Sarid, Assaf. “Geographical Origins and Economic Consequences of Language Structures.” CEPR Discussion Paper 11627, London, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., and Shleifer, Andrei. “Legal Origins.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 4 (2002): 1193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paola, and Zingales, Luigi. “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, no. 3 (2009): 1095–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, Karen. Revisiting Prussia’s Wars against Napoleon: History, Culture, and Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, Erik. “Immigration and the Diffusion of Technology: The Huguenot Diaspora in Prussia.” American Economic Review 104, no. 1 (2014): 84–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang, and Shiue, Carol H.. “Market Integration as a Mechanism of Growth.” CEPR Discussion Paper 11917, London, 2016.Google Scholar
Kisch, Herbert. From Domestic Manufacture to Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Rhineland Textile Districts: The Case of the Rhineland Textile Districts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kopsidis, Michael, and Bromley, Daniel W.. “The French Revolution and German Industrialization: Dubious Models and Doubtful Causality.” Journal of Institutional Economics 12, no. 1 (2016): 161–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Preussen zwischen Reform und Revolution. Allgemeines Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegung von 1791 bis 1848. Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett, 1967.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” Journal of Economic Literature 46, no. 2 (2008): 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecce, Giampaolo, and Ogliari, Laura. “Replication: Institutional Transplant and Cultural Proximity: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Prussia.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-00-00. https://doi.org/10.3886/E111782V1.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Georges. Napoleon. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Leighton, James. Witnessing the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars in German Central Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Lobingier, C. S. “Napoleon and His Code.” Harvard Law Review 32, no. 2 (1918): 114–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailath, George J., Morris, Stephen, and Postlewaite, Andrew. “Laws and Authority.” Research in Economics 71, no. 1 (2017): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Timothy. The Rule of Empires: Those Who Built Them, Those Who Endured Them, and Why They Always Fall. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pfohl, Ernst, and Friedrich, Ernst. Die Deutsche Wirtschaft in Karten (System Prof. Pfohl): 430 Karten und Diagramme uber die Deutsche Produktion in Bergbau, Industrie, Landwirtschaft. Die Standorte der Industrie, die Verteilung der Arbeiterschaft und die Stellung Deutschlands in der Weltproduktion. Berlin: Hobbing, 1928.Google Scholar
Pierenkemper, Toni, and Tilly, Richard H.. The German Economy During the Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Poole, Reginald L. A History of the Huguenots of the Dispersion at the Recall of the Edica of Nantes. London: Macmillan and Company, 1880.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. One Economics, Many Recipes. Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Michael. From Reich to State: The Rhineland in the Revolutionary Age, 1780–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleunes, Karl A. (1989). Schooling and Society: The Politics of Education in Prussia and Bavaria 1750–1900. London: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F., and Fennig, Charles D.. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 21st ed., 2018.Google Scholar
Smets, Joseph. “Le Rhin, frontiere naturelle de la France.” Annales historiques de la Revolution Francaise 314, no. 1 (1998): 675–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, William W. “The Code Napoleon.” American Law Register 49 (1901): 127–47.Google Scholar
Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain. “The Diffusion of Development.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124, no. 2 (2009): 469–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain. “Ancestry, Language and Culture.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language, edited by Ginsburgh, Victor and Weber, Shlomo, Chapter 6. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain. “Fertility and Modernity.” NBER Working Paper No. 25957, Cambridge, MA, June 2019.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy M. Women’s Rights in France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Tilly, Richard H. “The Political Economy of Public Finance and the Industrialization of Prussia, 1815–1866.” Journal of Economic History 26, no. 4 (1966): 484–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Stuart. Napoleon’s Integration of Europe. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Zweynert, Joachim. “Shock Therapy and the Transfer of Institutions: The New Debate and Some Lessons from the Post-1806 Reforms in Prussia and in Southwestern Germany.” Constitutional Political Economy 22, no. 2 (2011): 122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lecce and Ogliari supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Lecce and Ogliari supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 772.3 KB