Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:25:24.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Modern Silk Road: The Global Raw-Silk Market, 1850–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Debin Ma
Debin Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3305.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From the mid-nineteenth century, the raw-silk trade served as the most important trade linkage between the then still largely closed economies of East Asia and the industrialized West. This article traces the evolution of the global raw-silk market during the period 1850 through 1930. Using comprehensive data on raw-silk prices and quantities and applying co-integration techniques, I find a well-integrated global raw-silk market evolved during this period. This article also examines the evolution of technologies and institutions of the global silk industry, which exhibited characteristics of path dependency and technical interrelatedness.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 330 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Franklin. “Silk Manufacturers.” In U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of the Population. Vol. 9. Washington, DC: GPO, 1902.Google Scholar
Allen, Franklin. The Silk Industry of the World at the Opening of the Twentieth Centuiy. New York: Silk Association of America, 1904.Google Scholar
Bacon, L. B., and Schloemer, F. C.. World Trade in Agricultural Products, Its Growth: Its Crisis; and the New Trade Policies. Rome: International Institute of Agriculture, 1940.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A.J.Dolado, J. W.Galbraith, , and Hendry, D. F.. Co-integration, Error-correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationaiy Data. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockett, L. P.The Silk Industry in America. New York: Silk Association of America, 1876.Google Scholar
Cayez, Pierre. L'industrialisation Lyonnaise au xixeme siecle, du grand commerce a la grande industrie. Tome II. These Presentee devant L'universite de Lyon II. Service de Reproduction des Theses Universite de Lille III, 1979Google Scholar
Chen, , Tsu-yu, . Chin Tai Chung-Kuo Ti Chi Hsieh Sao Ssu Kung Yeh, 1860–1945 (The silk industry of modern China, 1860–1945). Institute of Modern History Academia Sinica, 1989.Google Scholar
Commodity Research Bureau, Inc. Commodity Year Book. New York: Wiley, 1939.Google Scholar
Eng, Y.Robert, . Economic Imperialism in China, Silk Production and Exports, 1861–1932. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1986.Google Scholar
France, . Ministere du Travail et de la Prevoyance Sociale. Annuaire Statistique. Vol. 53. Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Fujino, Shozaburo, Shiro, Fujino, and Akira, Ono, eds. Estimates of Long-Term Economic Statistics of Japan since 1868. Vol. 11. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinposha, 1979.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (09 1945): 519–30.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D.Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayami, Y., and Sabura, Y.. The Agricultural Development in Modem Japan, A Centuiy's Perspective. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Italy. Istituto Centrale di Statistica. Sommario di Statistiche Storiche Italiane, 1861–1955. Roma, 1958.Google Scholar
Japan Statistical Association, Historical Statistics of Japan. Vol. 3. Tokyo, 1987.Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, Yukihiko. “The Diffusion of New Technologies in the Japanese Sericulture Industry: The Case of the Hybrid Silkworm.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 25 (1984): 31–59.Google Scholar
Latham, A. J. H. “The International Trade in Rice and Wheat since 1868; a Study in Market Integration.” In The Emergence of a World Economy 1500–1914, vol. 2, edited by Wolfram, Fischer, McInnis, R. Marvin, and Jurgen, Schneider, 645–64. Wiesbaden: In Kommission bei Franz Steiner Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Latham, A. J. H., and Larry, Neal. “The International Market in Rice and Wheat, 1868–1914.” Economic History Review 36 (1983): 260–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Lillian M.China's Silk Trade: Traditional Industiy in the Modern World 1842–1937. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1981.Google Scholar
Li, Lillian M. “The Silk Export Trade and Economic Modernization in China and Japan in the Eighteenth Century.” In American Performance in Historical Perspective: The Chinese and American Performance, edited by Ernest, R. May and John, K. Fairbanks, 77–99. Harvard Studies in American-East Asian Relations, no. 11. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lieu, D. K.The Silk Industry of China. Shanghai-Hongkong-Singapore: Kelly and Walsh, Limited, 1941.Google Scholar
Margrave, R. D. “Technology Diffusion and the Transfer of Skills: Nineteenth Century English Silk Migration to Paterson.” In Silk City, edited by Scranton, P. B., 9–34. Newark: Publisher, 1985.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N., and Zecher, Richard J. “How the Gold Standard Worked, 1880–1913.” In The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments, edited by Jacob, A. Frenkel and Harry, G. Johnson, 357–85. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1976.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N., and Zecher, Richard J. “The Success of Purchasing-Power Parity: Historical Evidence and Its Implications for Macroeconomics.” In A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821–1931, edited by Michael, D. Bordo and Anna, J. Schwartz, 121–70.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.International Historical Statistics: The Americas: 1750–1988. 2d ed. New York: Stockton Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R.International Historical Statistics: Europe: 1750–1988. 3d ed.New York: Stockton Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molteni, Corrado. “The Development of the Silk Reeling Industry in the Process of Japanese Industrialization (1868–1930).” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali 30 (08 1983): 735–58.Google Scholar
Ogura, Takekazu, ed. Agricultural Development in Modern Japan. City: Fuji Publishing Co., 1970.Google Scholar
Ono, Akira. “Technical Progress in Silk Industry in Prewar Japan: The Types of Borrowed Technology.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 27, no. 1 (1986): 1–10.Google Scholar
Piore, M. J. and Sabel, C. F.. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Royal Institute of International Affairs. World Agriculture: An International Survey. London: Oxford University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip B. “An Exceedingly Irregular Business: Structure and Process in the Paterson Silk Industry, 1885–1910.” In Silk City, edited by Scranton, P. B., 35–72. Newark: Publisher, 1985.Google Scholar
Silk Association of America. Annual Reports of the Silk Association of America. New York, 1872–1929.Google Scholar
Shih, , Min-hsiung, . Silk Industry in Ch'ing China. Translated E-tu, Zen Sun. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, the University of Michigan, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, F. W.Some Aspects of the Tariff Question. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Xu, , Xin-wu, , ed. Zhongguo Jindai Saosi Gongyeshi (Modern history of the Chinese silk-Reeling industry). Shanghai: People's Publishing House, 1990.Google Scholar
U.K. Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom. (1848–1910). London.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO, 1914–1938.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate. Wholesale Prїces, Wages, and Transportation. 52d Congress, 2d sess., 1893.Google Scholar
U.S. Tariff Commission. Broad-Silk Manufacture and the Tariff. Washington, DC: GPO, 1926.Google Scholar