Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T06:57:10.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Death and continuity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Alexander Gramsch
Alexander Gramsch*
Affiliation:
Schönhauser Allee 143, 10435-Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

This article suggests that the common appearance of cultural (‘midden’) material under barrows of the Trichterbecher culture is interpreted as the purposeful metaphor of continuity of the small-scale society that has just suffered the loss of one or more of its actors. The three stages of rites de passage as outlined by van Gennep are used to explain the mortuary rituals further. Separation was signified by the enclosure (ditch or palisade) around the future barrow site and a ‘facade’. The liminal stage may be marked archaeologically by the ‘cleansing’ of fire or dismantling of facades at the barrow entrance, and sometimes by ploughing, which destroyed the cultural material on the site. Reintegration was the ‘planting’ of the deceased under soil and the erection of the barrow. The paper concludes with implications for the growth of a lineage organisation of society.

Dieser Aufsatz argumentiert, daß das gewöhnliche Auftreten von kulturellem ‘Abfall’ unter Grabhügeln der Trichterbecherkultur als bezweckte Metaphor für Kontinuität einer kleinen Gesellschaft diente, die gerade den Verlust von einem, einer oder mehreren ihrer Mitglieder(innen) erlitten hat. Die drei Stufen der ‘rites de passage’ (Übergangsriten, nach van Gennep) werden zur weiteren Erklärung des Begräbnisrituals herangezogen. Trennung wurde angezeigt durch die Einfassung (Graben oder Palisade) des späteren Grabhügels und die Fassaden. Die Übergangsstufe mag sich archäologisch durch das ‘Säubern’ des Feuers oder das Abbrechen der Fassaden am Eingang der Grabhügels andeuten, und manchmal durch Bepflügen, wodurch alles kulturelle Material an dieser Stelle zerstört wurde. Die Wiedereingliederung war das ‘Unter-die-Erde-bringen’ des oder der Verstorbenen und die Aufschüttung des Grabhügels. Der Beitrag schließt ab mit Implikationen für eine Zunahme von Gesellschaften, die nach ‘lineages’ organisiert sind.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 71 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Søren H. and Johansen, Erik, 1990. An early Neolithic grave at Bjørnsholm. Journal of Danish Archaeology 9: 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1954. Stenalderbebyggelsen ved Store Valby i Vestsjælland. Årboger 1954: 127–197.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1973. Problems of the megalithic ‘mortuary houses’ in Denmark. In Daniel, Glyn and Kjærum, P. (eds), Megalithic Graves and Ritual. Papers presented at the III Atlantic Colloquium Moesgård 1969: 75–79. Copenhagen: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice, 1977. The past and the present in the present. Man 12: 278–292.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice, 1982. Death, women, and power. In Bloch, Maurice and Parry, J. (eds), Death and the Regeneration of Life: 211–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert, 1981. The emergence of formal disposal areas and the ‘problem’ of megalithic tombs in prehistoric Europe. In Chapman, Robert, Kinnes, Ian, and Randsborg, Klavs (eds), The Archaeology of Death: 71–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chmielewski, Waldemar, 1952. Zagadnienie grobowcow Kujawskich w swietle ostatnich badan. Lodz: Biblioteka Muzeum Archeologicznego w Lodzi.Google Scholar
Damm, Charlotte Brysting, 1991. Burying the past: an example of social transformation in the Danish Neolithic. In Garwood, Paul, Jennings, David, Skeates, Robin, and Toms, Judith (eds), Sacred and Profane. Proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion. Oxford 1989: 43–49. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology (Monograph 32).Google Scholar
Dehnke, Rudolf, 1940. Die Tiefstichtonware der Jungsteinzeit in Osthannover. Hildesheim: A. Lax Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, 1966. Purity and Danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Klaus, 1975. Die jüngere Trichterbecherkultur auf den dänischen Inseln. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Klaus and Mahler, Ditlev, 1979. Virum – Et tidlig neolitisk bopladsfund. Årboger 1979: 11–61.Google Scholar
Eggers, Hans Jürgen, 1969. Pommersche Funde und Ausgrabungen aus den 30er und 40er Jahren. Hamburg: Hamburgisches Museum für Völkerkunde und Vorgeschichte (11. Beiheft zum Atlas der Urgeschichte).Google Scholar
Faber, Ole, 1977. Endnu et kulthus – et stenaldertempel ved Engedal i Midtjylland. In Fortidsmindevorwaltningen, Antikvariske Studier tilegnet K. Thorvildsen: 35–46. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Fischer, Christian, 1974. Simpel Jordgrav. Skalk 1974 (1): 11–15.Google Scholar
Fischer, Christian, 1975. Tidlik-neolitiske anlæg ved Rustrup. Kuml 1975: 29–72.Google Scholar
Glob, P. V., 1949. Barkær, Danmarks ældste landsby. Nationalmuseets Arbeidsmark 1949: 1–12.Google Scholar
Glob, P. V., 1975. De dódes lange huse. Skalk 1975 (6): 10–14.Google Scholar
Gramsch, Alexander, 1993. Death and Continuity. The mortuary ritual of the earthen long barrows of the TRB. Unpubl. M.Phil.-thesis University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1988. Material culture texts and social change: a theoretical discussion and some archaeological examples. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54: 67–75.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1989. This is not an article about material culture as text. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 250–269.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwelll.Google Scholar
Huntington, Richard and Metcalf, Peter, 1979. Celebrations of Death. The anthropology of mortuary ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jadczykowa, Irena, 1971. Sprawodzanie z koncowego etapu prac badawczych na Neo-litycznym cmentarzysku grobowcow Kujawskich w Wietrzychowicach, pow. Kolo. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 18: 93–103.Google Scholar
Jazdzewski, Konrad, 1936. Kultura pucharow lejkowatych w Polsce zachodniej i srodkowej. Poznan: Poznan University.Google Scholar
Jazdzewski, Konrad, 1973. The relations between Kujawian barrows in Poland and megalithic tombs in northern Germany, Denmark, and western European countries. In Daniel, Glyn and Kjærum, P. (eds), Megalithic Graves and Ritual. Papers presented at the III Atlantic Colloquium, Moesgård 1969: 63–74. Copenhagen: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Johansen, Erik, 1985. A burial mound with culture layers from the Early Bronze Age near Torslev, Jutland. Journal of Danish Archaeology 4: 115–120.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Erik, 1977. Brændende langdysser. Skalk 1977/5: 7–13.Google Scholar
Kapica, Zdzislaw, 1971. Analiza antropologiczna materialow kostnych z cementarzyska kultury pucharow lejkowatych na stanowisk 1 w Sarnowie, pow. Wloclawek-z grobowca 8. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 18: 121–123.Google Scholar
Kaul, Flemming, 1987. Neolitiske gravanlaeg på Onsved Mark, Horns Herred, Sjælland. Årboger 187: 27–83.Google Scholar
Kinnes, Ian, 1992. Non-megalithic long barrows and allied structures in the British Neolithic. London: British Museum (British Museum Occasional Paper 52).Google Scholar
Kjærum, Poul, 1967. Mortuary houses and funeral rites in Denmark. Antiquity 41: 190–196.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Inge Kjær, 1989. Storgård IV – an early Neolithic long barrow near Fjelsø, North Jutland. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8: 72–87.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Kristian, 1990. Ard marks under barrows: a response to Peter Rowley-Conwy. Antiquity 64: 322–327.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, Jean S., 1972. Introduction. In La Fontaine, J. S. (ed.), The Interpretation of Ritual. Essays in Honour of A.J. Richards: ix–xviii. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., 1980. Days of Shining Red. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liversage, David, 1980. Neolithic monuments at Lindebjerg, northwest Zealand. Acta Archaeologia 51: 85–152.Google Scholar
Madsen, Bo and Nielsen, Poul Otto, 1977. To tidlig-neolitiske jordgrave. In Antikvariske Studier tilgenet K. Thorvildsen: 27–34. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet Forlag.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1971. Grave med telteformet overbygning. Kuml 1971: 127–149.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1973–74. Tidlig neolitiske anlæg ved Tolstrup. Kuml 1973–74: 121–154.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1979a. Earthen long barrows and timber structures: aspects of the early Neolithic mortuary practice in Denmark. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 45: 301–320.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1979b. En tidligneolitisk langhøj i Østjylland. Kuml 1979: 79–108.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1982. Settlement systems of early agricultural societies in east Jutland: a regional study of change. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 197–236.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1986. Where did all the hunters go? Journal of Danish Archaeology 5: 229–239.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1988. Causewayed enclosures in south Scandinavia. In Burgess, C. et al. (eds), Enclosures and Defenses in the Neolithic of Western Europe: 301–336. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 403).Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten, 1991. The social structure of early Neolithic society in south Scandinavia. In Lichardus, J. (ed.), Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche: 489–496. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten and Juel Jensen, H., 1982. Settlement and land use in early Neolithic Denmark. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 15: 63–86.Google Scholar
Madsen, Torsten and Petersen, Jens Erik, 1982–83. Tidligneolitiske anlæg ved Mose-gården. Kuml 1982–83, 61–120.Google Scholar
Marseen, Oscar, 1960. Ferslev-huset, en kultbygning fra jaettestuetid. Kuml 1960, 36–55.Google Scholar
Midgley, Magdalena S., 1985. The Origin and Function of the Earthen Long Barrows of Northern Europe. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 259).Google Scholar
Midgley, Magdalena S., 1992. TRB Culture – The first farmers of the North European Plain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Niesiolowska-Sreniowska, Ewa, 1980. Materialy krzemienne z fazy AB kultury pucharow lejkowatych z grobowa 8 w Sarnowie, woj. Wloclawek. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 27: 85–155.Google Scholar
Nilius, Inge, 1971. Das Neolithikum in Mecklenburg zur Zeit und unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Trichterbecherkultur. Schwerin: Museum für Ur- und Frühgeschichte.Google Scholar
Rønne, Preben, 1979. Høj over høj. Skalk 1979 (5): 3–8.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, Peter, 1987. The interpretation of ard-marks. Antiquity 61: 263–266.Google Scholar
Skaarup, Jørgen, 1972. Hesselø – Sølager. Jagdstationen der Südskandinavischen Trichterbecherkultur. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Skaarup, Jörgen, 1975. Stengade – Ein langeländischer Wohnplatz mit Hausresten aus der frühneolitischen Zeit. Rudkøbing: Langelands Museum.Google Scholar
Skaarup, Jørgen, 1982. Siedlungs- und Wirtschaftsstrukturen in der Trichterbecherkultur in Dänemark. Offa 39: 39–52.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, Ernst, 1952. Zwei Megalithgräber aus Schleswig und Holstein. Offa 10: 15–28.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, Ernst, 1954. Kammerlose Hünenbetten im Sachsenwald. Offa 13: 1–16.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, Ernst, 1967. Atlas der Megalithgräber Deutschlands, vol. 2. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Stürup, Bjørn, 1965. En ny jordgrav fra tidlilg-neolitisk tid. Kuml 1965: 13–22.Google Scholar
Tarlow, Sarah A., 1990. Metaphors and Neolithic-Bronze Age Burial Mounds. , University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tarlow, Sarah A., 1995. Scraping the bottom of the barrow: an agricultural metaphor in Neolithic/Bronze-Age European burial practice: Journal of Theoretical Archaeology 3/4: 119–140.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julian, 1987. Relations of production and social change in the Neolithic of north-west Europe. Man 22: 405–430.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julian, 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher, 1984. Ideology and the legitimisation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. In Miller, Daniel and Tilley, Christopher (eds), Ideology, Power and Prehistory: 111–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, 1967. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
van Gennep, Arnold, 1960. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (first published 1909).Google Scholar
Wiklak, Henryk, 1980. Wyniki badan wykopaliskowych w obrebie grobowca 8 w Samowie w woj. Wloclawskim. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 27: 33–83.Google Scholar
Wiklak, Henryk, 1983. Wyniki badan wykopaliskowych w osadziei na unetarcysku kultury pucharow leikowatych na stanowisku 1A w Samowie, woj. Wloclawskie. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 30: 167–200.Google Scholar
Wiklak, Henryk, 1986. Podsumowanie wynikow badan wykopaliskowych w obrebie grobowca 9 w Samowie, woj. Wloclawskie. Prace i Materialy Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Lodzi 33: 5–21.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., 1972. The wedding cakes: a study of ritual change. In: La Fontaine, J. S. (ed.), The Interpretation of Ritual: 187–201. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar