Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:03:52.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dead Hand Proxy Puts and Hedge Fund Activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2018

Sean J. Griffith  and
Natalia Reisel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the Dead Hand Proxy Put, a contractual innovation in corporate debt agreements that may impact hedge fund activism. We find the provision principally in loans, not bonds, and provide evidence linking the adoption of the provision to hedge fund activism. Furthermore, controlling for endogeneity, we find that the provision significantly reduces the cost of loans. Bondholder wealth also increases. Moreover, cross-sectional analysis of share returns reveals that the provision is positively associated with repeat banking relationships and negatively associated with free cash flow problems, suggesting a cost-benefit tradeoff.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 1615 - 1642
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We have benefited from discussions with Yakov Amihud, Jennifer Arlen, Alon Brav, Joe Grundfest, Victoria Ivashina, Frank Partnoy, Eric Talley, John Wald, and Mark Weinstein and from comments received at the 2016 American Law and Economics Association conference, the 2016 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies and presentations at Florida State University, Fordham University, the University of California Los Angeles, the University of Notre Dame, the University of Southern California, and at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor. An earlier version of this paper was circulated under the title “Dead Hand Proxy Puts, Hedge Fund Activism, and the Cost of Capital.” We also thank Paul Malatesta (the editor) and an anonymous referee for their constructive guidance that greatly improved the paper.

References

Aghion, P., and Bolton, P.. “An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting.” Review of Economic Studies, 59 (1992), 473–494.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Lev, B.. “Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers.” Bell Journal of Economics, 12 (1981), 605–617.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A.; Brav, A.; and Jiang, W.. “The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism.” Columbia Law Review, 115 (2015), 1085–1155.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Managerial Behavior Following Antitakeover Legislation.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 1043–1043.Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H.; Kahle, K. M.; Maxwell, W. F.; and Xu, D.. “Measuring Abnormal Bond Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2008), 4219–4258.Google Scholar
Billett, M.; King, T. D.; and Mauer, D.. “Bondholder Wealth Effects in Mergers and Acquisitions: New Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 107–135.Google Scholar
Billett, M.; King, T. D.; and Mauer, D.. “Growth Opportunities and the Choice of Leverage, Debt Maturity, and Covenants.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 697–730.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., and Roberts, M. R.. “The Structure and Pricing of Bond Covenants.” Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5 (2015), 1–37.Google Scholar
Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; and Kim, H.. “Hedge Fund Activism: A Review.” Foundations and Trends in Finance, 4 (2010), 185–246.Google Scholar
Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; Partnoy, F.; and Thomas, R.. “Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 1729–1775.Google Scholar
Cameron, A., and Trivedi, P.. Microeconomics: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (2005).Google Scholar
Chava, S., and Roberts, M. R.. “How Does Financing Impact Investment? The Role of Debt Covenants.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 2085–2121.Google Scholar
Clifford, C. P.“Value Creation or Destruction? Hedge Fund as Shareholder Activists.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 14 (2008), 323–336.Google Scholar
Cremers, K. J. M.; Giambona, E.; Sepe, S. M.; and Wang, Y.. “Hedge Fund Activism and Long-Term Firm Value.” Working Paper, University of Notre Dame (2015).Google Scholar
Dewatripont, M., and Tirole, J.. “A Theory of Debt and Equity: Diversity of Securities and Manager-Shareholder Congruence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (1994), 1027–1054.Google Scholar
Dichev, I. D., and Piotroski, J. D.. “The Long-Run Stock Returns Following Bond Ratings Changes.” Journal of Finance, 52 (2001), 173–203.Google Scholar
Dick-Nielsen, J.“How to Clean Enhanced TRACE Data.” Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2337908 (2014).Google Scholar
Francis, B. B.; Hasan, I.; John, K.; and Waisman, M.. “The Effect of State Antitakeover Laws on the Firm’s Bondholders.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 127–154.Google Scholar
Gantchev, N.“The Costs of Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Sequential Decision Model.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 610–631.Google Scholar
Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. New York, NY: Prentice Hall (2002).Google Scholar
Hoffman, L.“Banks Feel the Heat from Lawsuits.” Wall Street Journal (Apr. 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (1976), 305–360.Google Scholar
Johnson, W.; Karpoff, J.; and Yi, S.. “The Bonding Hypothesis of Takeover Defenses: Evidence from IPO Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 307–332.Google Scholar
Kahan, M., and Klausner, M.. “Antitakeover Provisions in Bonds: Bondholder Protection or Management Entrenchment?” UCLA Law Review, 40 (1993), 931–982.Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, E.. “Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other Private Investors.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 187–229.Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, E.. “The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on the Target Firm’s Existing Bondholders.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 1735–1771.Google Scholar
Knoeber, C.“Golden Parachutes, Shark Repellents, and Hostile Tender Offers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 155–167.Google Scholar
Lehn, K., and Poulsen, A.. “Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 771–787.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. F., and Rao, R. P.. “Do Spin-Offs Expropriate Wealth from Bondholders?” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2087–2108.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W., and Stephens, C.. “The Wealth Effects of Repurchases on Bondholders.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 895–919.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.“Proxy Puts Invite Shareholders, Attorneys to Come Knocking.” Wall Street Journal, (2015).Google Scholar
Nash, R.; Netter, J.; and Poulsen, A.. “Determinants of Contractual Relations Between Shareholders and Bondholders: Investments Opportunities and Restrictive Covenants.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 9 (2003), 201–232.Google Scholar
Partnoy, F.“U.S. Hedge Fund Activism.” In Research Handbook on Shareholder Power, Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S., eds. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing (2015), 99–115.Google Scholar
Qi, Y., and Wald, J.. “State Laws and Debt Covenants.” Journal of Law and Economics, 51 (2008), 179–207.Google Scholar
Rajan, R., and Winton, A.. “Covenants and Collateral as Incentives to Monitor.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1113–1146.Google Scholar
Reisel, N.“On the Value of Restrictive Covenants: Empirical Investigation of Public Bond Issues.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 27 (2014), 251–268.Google Scholar
Roberts, M., and Sufi, A.. “Control Rights and Capital Structure: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1657–1695.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Summers, L.. “Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers.” In Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, Auerbach, A. J., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1988), 33–68.Google Scholar
Smith, C., and Warner, J. B.. “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 117–161.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. D.“A Defense Against Hostile Takeovers Develops a Downside.” New York Times (Nov. 25, 2014).Google Scholar
Sufi, A.“Information Asymmetry and Financing Arrangements: Evidence from Syndicated Loans.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 629–668.Google Scholar
Sunder, J.; Sunder, S. V.; and Wongsunwai, W.. “Debtholder Responses to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from Hedge Fund Interventions.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 3318–3342.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2006).Google Scholar
Willis, R., and Rosen, S.. “Education and Self-Selection.” Journal of Political Economy, 87 (1979), 7–36.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2001).Google Scholar