Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T18:42:17.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Does Acquisition Experience Affect Managerial Career Outcomes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Daniel Greene
Affiliation:
Clemson University College of Businessdtg@clemson.edu
Jared Smith*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University Poole College of Managementjared_smith@ncsu.edu
*
jared_smith@ncsu.edu (corresponding author)

Abstract

We use hand-collected data from acquisition press releases to investigate how acquisition experience affects the career outcomes of non-CEO senior managers. To address the non-random nature of gaining experience, we separately use manager and firm-year fixed effects, as well as an instrumental variable analysis. Acquisition experience is positively related to compensation, the likelihood of a future board seat, and the likelihood of promotion to chief executive officer. Further tests suggest that the effects of experience decay over time, have diminishing returns, and do not depend on deal quality. Finally, we search Securities and Exchange Commission filings to document novel information on managerial roles in mergers and acquisitions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© THE AUTHOR(S), 2020. PUBLISHED BY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS ON BEHALF OF THE MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Robert Schonlau (the referee) for improving the paper. We also thank Stu Gillan, Shane Johnson, XinXin Li, Brandon Lockhart, Shawn Mobbs, Chip Ryan, Matthew Serfling, Denis Sosyura, an anonymous reviewer, seminar participants at Clemson University, and conference participants at the 2018 Midwest Finance Association Annual Meeting in San Antonio for helpful comments. We are grateful for financial support from a Dean’s Excellence Fund Grant. We thank Morgan Clark, Efe Crentsil, and Pam Harris for excellent research assistance.

References

Aggarwal, R., and Samwick, A.. “Performance Incentives within Firms: The Effect of Managerial Responsibility.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 16131649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahern, K., and Sosyura, D.. “Who Writes the News? Corporate Press Releases during Merger Negotiations.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 241291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, J., and Edmans, A.. “Do Investment Banks Matter for M&A Returns?Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2013), 22862315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy, 70 (1962), 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Lemmon, M.; and Naveen, L.. “Does the Use of Peer Groups Contribute to Higher Pay and Less Efficient Compensation?Journal of Financial Economics, 90 (2008), 152168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, A.; Field, L.; Karpoff, J.; and Raheja, C.. “The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 85 (2007), 66101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. C., and Miller, D.. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, 50 (2015), 317372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chava, S., and Purnanandam, A.. “CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and Corporate PoliciesJournal of Financial Economics, 97 (2010), 263278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichello, M. S.; Fee, C. E.; Hadlock, C. J.; and Sonti, R.. “Promotions, Turnover, and Performance Evaluation: Evidence from the Careers of Division Managers.” Accounting Review, 84 (2009), 11191143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.; Daniel, N.; and Naveen, L.. “Boards: Does One Size Fit All?Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), 329356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.; Daniel, N.; and Naveen, L.. “Co-opted Boards.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 17511796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custodio, C.; Ferreira, M.; and Matos, P.. “Generalists versus Specialists: Lifetime Work Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 471492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta, S., and Iskandar-Datta, M.. “Upper-Echelon Executive Human Capital and Compensation: Generalist vs. Specialist Skills.” Strategic Management Journal, 35 (2014), 18531866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, A., and Duchin, R.. “Looking in the Rearview Mirror: The Effect of Managers’ Professional Experience on Corporate Financial Policy.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 565602.Google Scholar
Duchin, R.; Goldberg, A.; and Sosyura, D.. “Spillovers Inside Conglomerates: Incentives and Capital.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 16961743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, M.; Matvos, G.; and Seru, A.. “The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct.” Journal of Political Economy, 127 (2019), 233295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J.; Guo, L.; and Mobbs, S.. “How Does Forced CEO Turnover Experience Affect Directors?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109020000307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E.Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 88 (1980), 288307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fee, C. E., and Hadlock, C.. “Raids, Rewards, and Reputations in the Market for Managerial Talent.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 13151357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fee, C. E., and Hadlock, C.. “Management Turnover across the Corporate Hierarchy.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37 (2004), 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillan, S.; Hartzell, J.; Koch, A.; and Starks, L.. “Getting the Incentives Right: Backfilling and Biases in Executive Compensation Data.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2017), 14601498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillan, S., and Nguyen, N.. “On the Labor Market for Chief Financial Officers.” Working Paper, University of Georgia and Marquette University (2017).Google Scholar
Gormley, T., and Matsa, D.. “Common Errors: How to (and Not to) Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 617661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.The Behavior of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects.” Econometrics Journal, 7 (2004), 98119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J.; Kruger, S.; and Maturana, G.. “Do Labor Markets Discipline? Evidence from RMBS Bankers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 133 (2019), 726750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harford, J., and Schonlau, R.. “Does the Director Labor Market Offer Ex Post Settling-Up for CEOs? The Case of Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 110 (2013), 1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J.; Petroni, K.; and Wang, I.. “CFOs and CEOs: Who Have the Most Influence on Earnings Management?Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 513526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.; Kolasinski, A.; and Nordlund, J.. “CEO Narcissism, Human Capital, and Firm Value.” Working Paper, Texas A&M University and Louisiana State University (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J.; Schonlau, R.; and Wehrly, E.. “Do Takeover Defense Indices Measure Takeover Deterrence?Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 23592412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.; Li, Y.; and Zhang, L.. “CFOs versus CEOs: Equity Incentives and Crashes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (2011), 713730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kini, O., and Williams, R.. “Tournament Incentives, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 350376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubick, T., and Lockhart, G. B.. “Industry Tournament Incentives and Stock Price Crash Risk.” Working Paper, University of Kansas and Clemson University (2017).Google Scholar
Lehn, K., and Zhao, M.. “CEO Turnover after Acquisitions: Are Bad Bidders Fired?Journal of Finance, 49 (2006), 17591811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J.; Netter, J.; and Yang, T.. “The Determinants of Board Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), 308328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U.; Pezone, V.; and Zheng, H.. “Managerial Duties and Managerial Biases.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (2019).Google Scholar
Masulis, R., and Mobbs, S.. “Are All Inside Directors the Same? Evidence from the External Directorship Market.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 823872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mian, S.On the Choice and Replacement of Chief Financial Officers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 143175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobbs, S.CEOs under Fire: The Effects of Competition from Inside Directors on Forced CEO Turnover and CEO Compensation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48 (2013), 669698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K., and Zabojnik, J.. “CEO Pay and Appointments: A Market-Based Explanation for Recent Trends.” American Economic Review, 94 (2004), 192196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K., and Zabojnik, J.. “Managerial Capital and the Market for CEOs.” Working Paper, University of Southern California and Queen’s University (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveen, L.Organizational Complexity and Succession Planning.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 661683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrino, R.CEO Turnover and Outside Succession A Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 165197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M.Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zingales, L.In Search of New Foundations.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 16231653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Greene and Smith supplementary material

Internet Appendix

Download Greene and Smith supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 49.7 KB