Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:36:43.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Mean Variance Models of Capital Structure and the Absurdity of Their Predictions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Nestor Gonzalez ,
Robert Litzenberger  and
Jacques Rolfo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Corporate taxes and default risk are relevant to an understanding of the effect of financial leverage on the total market value of the firm. Recently, Kraus and Litzenberger [6] have examined the implications of taxes and default risk for capital structure decisions in a state preference valuation model. A parameter preference model as distinct from a state preference model may be applied to continuous probability distributions. As the most familiar parameter preference approach, the capital asset pricing model is an obvious alternative approach to incorporate the effects of leverage in a world of taxes and default risks. Given the analysis by Hamada [4] of the effects of taxes in absence of default risk and by Stiglitz [16] of the effects of default risk in absence of corporate taxes, such an exercise would superficially appear to be a trivial extension of their studies. However, this paper presents a “reduction ad absurdum” argument that, in an economy where corporate interest charges are tax deductible and firms issue risky debt, the total market value of a levered firm using the capital asset pricing model is misspecified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 165 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Black, F. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business (July 1972), pp. 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Durand, D.“Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement.”Conference on Research on Business Finance.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research (1952), pp. 215–247.Google Scholar
[3]Gonzales, N.; Litzenberger, R.; and Rolfo, J.. “On Mean-Variance Models of Capital Structure and the Absurdity of their Predictions.” Research Paper No. 259, Stanford University (May 1975).Google Scholar
[4]Hamada, R. “Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium and Corporation Finance.” Journal of Finance (March 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Haugen, R., and Pappas, J.. “Equilibrium in the Pricing of Capital Assets, Risk Bearing Debt Instruments, and the Question of Optimal Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (June 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kraus, A., and Litzenberger, R.. “A State Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage.” Journal of Finance (September 1973), pp. 911–921.Google Scholar
[7]Kraus, A., “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Finance (September 1976), pp. 1085–1100.Google Scholar
[8]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics (February 1965), pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Markowitz, H. “The Utility of Wealth.” Journal of Political Economy (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review (June 1958), pp. 261–297.Google Scholar
[11]Modigliani, F. “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.” American Economic Review (June 1963), pp. 433–443.Google Scholar
[12]Mossin, J.Theory of Financial Markets. Prentice Hall (1972).Google Scholar
[13]Rubinstein, M. “The Fundamental Theorem of Parameter-Preference Security Valuation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (September 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Rubinstein, M. “An Aggregation Theorem for Securities Market.” Journal of Financial Economics (September 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance (September 1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[16]Stiglitz, J. “A Re-Examination of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem.” American Economic Review (December 1969), pp. 784–793.Google Scholar
[17]Williams, J. B.The Theory of Investment Value, Cambridge, Mass. (1938).Google Scholar
[18]Wilson, R. “The Theory of Syndicates.” Econometrica (January 1968), pp. 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar