Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:02:05.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empirical Analysis of the Risk-Return Preferences of Individual Investors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

H. Kent Baker ,
Michael B. Hargrove  and
John A. Haslem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A common dilemma faced by investors and portfolio managers is the tradeoff preference between risk and return. The general consensus and convention in finance and economics is that, in the aggregate, investors do not seek risk for its own sake. If so, it is reasonable to assume that returns on individual common stocks vary according to their risk. However, it is not the purpose of this paper to examine the ex post risk and return experience of various financial assets. This and related work have been treated by Sharpe [22] and by others. While some of these are studies of individual common stocks, the majority involves the ex post risk-return relationships of portfolios managed by institutional or professional investors. Although the conclusions are not totally consistent concerning the shape of the risk-return function, there is agreement that a generally positive relationship exists between risk and expected return. To date, little empiricism has been directed specifically to the ex ante risk-return preferences of individual common-stock investors. This paper takes a step in this direction by analyzing the ex ante risk-return preferences and expectations of individual common-stock investors. The purpose is two-fold: (1) to provide positive (as opposed to normative) evidence on the nature of the relationship between acceptable risk levels and expected annual rates of return; and (2) to examine the nature of this relationship between risk and the components of total return, income from dividends and capital appreciation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 377 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baker, H. Kent, and Haslem, John A.. “Information Needs of Individual Investors.” Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 136 (November 1973), pp. 64–69.Google Scholar
[2]Baker, H. Kent, “The Impact of Investor Socioeconomic Characteristics on Risk and Return Preferences.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 2 (October 1974), pp. 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Baker, H. Kent. “Toward the Development of Client-Specified Valuation Models.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 24 (September 1974), pp. 1255–1263.Google Scholar
[4]Black, Fisher, and Scholes, Myron. “The Effects of Dividend Yield and Dividend Policy on Common Stock Prices and Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 1 (May 1974), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Black, Fisher; Jensen, Michael C.; and Scholes, Myron. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, Michael C.. New York: Praeger Publishers (1972), pp. 79–121.Google Scholar
[6]Bolten, Steven E.Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. (1972).Google Scholar
[7]Cohn, Richard A.; Lewellen, Wilbur G.; Lease, Ronald C.; and Schlarbaum, Gary G.. “Individual Investor Risk Aversion and Investment Portfolio Composition.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30 (May 1975), pp. 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Domar, Evsey D., and Musgrave, Richard A.. “Proportional Income Taxation and Risk-Taking.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 57 (May 1944), pp. 388–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ferguson, C. E., and Kreps, Juanita M.. Principles of Economics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1962).Google Scholar
[10]Fisher, Laurence, and Lorie, James H.. “Rates of Return on Investments in Common Stock: The Year-by-Year Record, 1926–65.” Journal of Business, Vol. 41 (July 1968), pp. 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Friedman, Milton, and Savage, Leonard J.. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 56 (August 1948), pp. 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Friend, Irwin; Blume, Marshall; and Crockett, Jean. Mutual Funds and Other Institutional Investors. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. (1970).Google Scholar
[13]Institutional Investor Study Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1971).Google Scholar
[14]Jensen, Michael C. “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios.” Journal of Business, Vol. 42 (April 1969), pp. 167–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Lapin, Lawrence L.Statistics for Modern Business Decisions. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, Inc. (1973).Google Scholar
[16]Lease, Ronald C.; Lewellen, Wilbur G.; and Schlarbaum, Gary G.. “The Individual Investor: Attributes and Attitudes.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 24 (May 1974), pp. 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Levy, Hain, and Sarnat, Marshall. Investment and Portfolio Analysis. New York: John Wiley S Sons, Inc. (1972).Google Scholar
[18]Miller, Merton H., and Modigliani, Franco. “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares.” Journal of Business, Vol. 34 (October 1961), pp. 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]McDonald, John G. “Objectives and Performance of Mutual Funds, 1960–1969.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9 (June 1974), pp. 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Nie, Norman; Bent, Dale; and Hull, Hadlai. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1970).Google Scholar
[21]Pratt, Shannon. “Relationships between Risk and Rate of Return for Common Stock.” D.B.A. dissertation, Indiana University (1966).Google Scholar
[22]Sharpe, William F. “Risk Aversion in the Stock Market: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 20 (September 1965), pp. 416–422.Google Scholar
[23]Slovic, Paul. “Psychological Study of Human Judgment: Implications for Investment Decision Making.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 27 (September 1972), pp. 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Somers, Robert H. “The Rank Analogue of Product-Moment Partial Correlation and Regression, with Application to Manifold, Ordered Contingency Tables.” Biometrica, Vol. 46 (July 1959), pp. 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar