Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T11:53:19.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Chance-Constrained Approach to Urban Renewal Decisions**

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

James C. T. Mao  and
Roger L. Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If all urban renewal projects were perfectly divisible and completely independent of one another, and if the urban renewal authority had perfect foresight as well as unlimited funds, the investment decision would be ideally simplified. There would be no need to choose between competing projects, and the urban renewal authority could evaluate each project on its own merits, without reference to any other project. Its decisions would be merely decisions to accept or reject single projects, uncomplicated by portfolio considerations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 135 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Byrne, R., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Kortanek, K., “A Chance- Constrained Approach to Capital Budgeting,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Volume II (12 1967).Google Scholar
2.Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., “Chance-Constrained Programming,” Management Science 6 (10 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Charnes, A., “Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing Under Chance Constraints,” Operations Research 11 (01–02 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lawler, E. L., and Bell, M. D., “A Method for Solving Discrete Optimization Problems,” Operations Research 14 (11–12 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mao, James C. T., Efficiency in Public Urban Renewal Expenditures Through Capital Budgeting (Berkeley, California: Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California, 1965).Google Scholar
6.Mao, James C. T, “Quantitative Analysis of Urban Renewal Investment Decisions,” Journal of Finance 22 (05 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Naslund, Bertil, “A Model of Capital Budgeting Under Risk,” Journal of Business 39 (04 1966).Google Scholar