Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T21:33:49.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Blockholder Heterogeneity: Security Market Effects and Follow-On Activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Jim Hsieh  and
Tao-Hsien Dolly King
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research on blockholders focuses on activist hedge funds and documents positive stock but negative bond returns. This study investigates the role of blockholder heterogeneity on security market effects and target firm follow-on activities across three important dimensions: identity, motive, and purchasing method. We show that target firms’ security returns and post-acquisition activities strongly correlate with blockholder heterogeneity. Further, bond returns are significantly positive for firms with blockholders’ debt-assistance motive while both stock and bond returns are significantly negative in private placements. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of blockholder heterogeneity on the valuation and performance consequences in block acquisitions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 101 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

King is grateful for the 2010 summer research grant from the Dean’s Office of the Belk College of Business at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. We acknowledge comments from Steve Christophe, Amy Edwards, Mike Ferri, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Andrew Karolyi, Stas Nikolova, Laura Starks, Lei Sun, Ralph Walkling, and participants in seminars at National Chiao Tung University, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the University of Cincinnati, and the 2010 National Taiwan University International Conference on Finance. Special thanks are due to Clifford Holderness (the referee) for numerous insightful suggestions. Chensong Li, Nischala Reddy, and Jessica Rogers provided excellent research assistance.

References

Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P. C.. “The ‘Wall Street Walk’ and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 2645–2685.Google Scholar
Admati, A. R.; Pfleiderer, P. C.; and Zechner, J.. “Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy, 102 (1994), 1097–1130.Google Scholar
Allen, J. W., and Phillips, G. M.. “Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances, and Product Market Relationships.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 2791–2815.Google Scholar
Ambrose, B. W.; Cai, K. N.; and Helwege, J.. “Fallen Angels and Price Pressure.” Journal of Fixed Income, 21 (2012), 74–86.Google Scholar
Baran, L. C., and King, T.-H. D.. “Going Private Transactions, Bondholder Returns, and Wealth Transfer Effects.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 34 (2010), 1856–1872.Google Scholar
Barclay, M. J.; Holderness, C. G.; and Sheehan, D. P.. “Private Placements and Managerial Entrenchment.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 13 (2007), 461–484.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A.; Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; and Keusch, T.. “Dancing with Activists.” Working Paper, Columbia University (2017).Google Scholar
Becker, B.; Cronqvist, H.; and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Estimating the Effects of Large Shareholders Using a Geographic Instrument.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 907–942.Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H.; Maxwell, W.; Kahle, K.; and Xu, D.. “Measuring Abnormal Bond Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 4219–4258.Google Scholar
Bethel, J. E.; Liebeskind, J. P.; and Opler, T.. “Block Share Purchases and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 605–634.Google Scholar
Billett, M. T.; King, T.-H. D.; and Mauer, D. C.. “Bondholder Wealth Effects in Mergers and Acquisitions: New Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 107–135.Google Scholar
Bodnaruk, A., and Rossi, M.. “Dual Ownership, Returns, and Voting in Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 120 (2016), 58–80.Google Scholar
Boyson, N. M., and Mooradian, R.. “Corporate Governance and Hedge Fund Activism.” Review of Derivatives Research, 14 (2011), 169–204.Google Scholar
Boyson, N. M.; Gantchev, N.; and Shivdasani, A.. “Activism Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 126 (2017), 54–73.Google Scholar
Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; Partnoy, F.; and Thomas, R.. “Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 1729–1776.Google Scholar
Brophy, D. J.; Ouimet, P. P.; and Sialm, C.. “Hedge Funds as Investors of Last Resort?” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 541–574.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, I., and Gantchev, N.. “Does Shareholder Coordination Matter? Evidence from Private Placements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 213–230.Google Scholar
Chaplinsky, S., and Haushalter, D.. “Financing under Extreme Risk: Contract Terms and Returns to Private Investments in Public Equity.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 2789–2820.Google Scholar
Chava, S.; Kumar, P.; and Warga, A.. “Managerial Agency and Bond Covenants.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1120–1148.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. C.; Hartzell, J. C.; and Rosenberg, J.. “The Impact of CEO Turnover on Equity Volatility.” Journal of Business, 78 (2005), 1779–1797.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H., and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Policies.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 3941–3976.Google Scholar
Daniel, K. D., and Titman, S.. “Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross-Sectional Variation in Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1–33.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, D.; Seery, L.; and Woidtke, T.. “Do Boards Pay Attention When Institutional Investor Activists ‘Just Vote No’?” Journal of Financial Economics, 90 (2008), 84–103.Google Scholar
Denes, M. R.; Karpoff, J. M.; and McWilliams, V. B.. “Thirty Years of Shareholder Activism: A Survey of Empirical Research.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 44 (2017), 405–424.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.“Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 2481–2513.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.“Blockholders and Corporate Governance.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6 (2013), 23–50.Google Scholar
Edmans, A., and Holderness, C. G.. “Blockholders: A Survey of Theory and Evidence.” Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, 1 (2017), 541–636.Google Scholar
Edmans, A., and Manso, G.. “Governance through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 2395–2428.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.; Fang, V. W.; and Zur, E.. “The Effect of Liquidity on Governance.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 1443–1482.Google Scholar
Gantchev, N.“The Costs of Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Sequential Decision Model.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 610–631.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., and Schor, M.. “Investor Activism and Takeovers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 362–375.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D.. “One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 175–202.Google Scholar
Grullon, G., and Michaely, R.. “Dividends, Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 1649–1684.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G.“Equity Issuances and Agency Costs: The Telling Story of Shareholder Approval around the World.” Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 415–489.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G., and Sheehan, D.. “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 317–346.Google Scholar
Hsieh, J., and Wang, Q.. “Insiders’ Tax Preferences and Firms’ Choices between Dividends and Share Repurchases.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 213–244.Google Scholar
Huson, M. R.; Malatesta, P. H.; and Parrino, R.. “The Decline in the Cost of Private Placements.” Working Paper, University of Alberta (2010).Google Scholar
Kang, J.-K., and Kim, J.-M.. “The Geography of Block Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 2817–2858.Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, E.. “Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other Private Investors.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 187–230.Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, E.. “The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on the Target Firm’s Existing Bondholder.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 1735–1771.Google Scholar
Levit, D.“Soft Shareholder Activism.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2014).Google Scholar
Li, Y., and Xu, J.. “Hedge Fund Activism and Bank Loan Contracting.” Working Paper, Purdue University (2010).Google Scholar
Maug, E.“Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off between Liquidity and Control?” Journal of Finance, 53 (1988), 65–98.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. F., and Rao, R. P.. “Do Spin-Offs Expropriate Wealth from Bondholders?” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2087–2108.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. F., and Stephens, C.. “The Wealth Effects of Repurchases on Bondholders.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 895–919.Google Scholar
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H.. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595–612.Google Scholar
Mehran, H.“Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 38 (1995), 163–184.Google Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Ruback, R. S.. “An Empirical Analysis of the Interfirm Equity Investment Process.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1985), 523–553.Google Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293–316.Google Scholar
Park, J. L.“Equity Issuance, Distress, and Agency Problems: The 20% Rule for Privately Issued Equity.” Working Paper, Korea University (2014).Google Scholar
Penas, M. F., and Unal, H.. “Gains in Bank Mergers: Evidence from the Bond Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 74 (2004), 149–179.Google Scholar
Petersen, M.“Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435–480.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A, and Vishny, R. W.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 461–488.Google Scholar
Sunder, J.; Sunder, S. V.; and Wongsunwai, W.. “Debtholder Responses to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from Hedge Fund Interventions.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 3318–3342.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. B.“Simple Formulas for Standard Errors that Cluster by Both Firm and Time.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 1–10.Google Scholar
Warga, A., and Welch, I.. “Bondholder Losses in Leveraged Buyouts.” Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 959–982.Google Scholar
Wei, C., and Yermack, D.. “Investor Reactions to CEOs’ Inside Debt Incentives.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 3813–3840.Google Scholar
Wruck, K. H.“Equity Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: Evidence from Private Equity Financings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (1989), 3–27.Google Scholar