Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:36:50.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boundary effects on ideal fluid forces and Kelvin's minimum energy theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2023

Kyle I. McKee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: kimckee@mit.edu

Abstract

The electrostatic force on a charge above a neutral conductor is generally attractive. Surprisingly, that force becomes repulsive in certain geometries (Levin & Johnson, Am. J. Phys., vol. 79, issue 8, 2011, pp. 843–849), a result that follows from an energy theorem in electrostatics. Based on the analogous minimum energy theorem of Kelvin (Camb. Dublin Math. J., vol. 4, 1849, pp. 107–112), valid in the theory of ideal fluids, we show corresponding effects on steady and unsteady fluid forces in the presence of boundaries. Two main results are presented regarding the unsteady force. First, the added mass is proven to always increase in the presence of boundaries. Second, in a model of a body approaching a boundary, where the unsteady force is typically repulsive (Lamb, Hydrodynamics, 1975, § 137, University Press), we present a geometry where the force can be attractive. As for the steady force, there is one main result: in a model of a Bernoulli suction gripper, for which the steady force is typically attractive, we show that the force becomes repulsive in some geometries. Both the unsteady and steady forces are shown to reverse sign when boundaries approximate flow streamlines, at energy minima predicted by Kelvin's theorem.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackermann, N.L. & Arbhabhirama, A. 1964 Viscous and boundary effects on virtual mass. J.Engng Mech. 90, 123130.Google Scholar
Basset, A.B. 1888 A Treatise on Hydrodynamics: With Numerous Examples, vol. 2. Deighton, Bell and Company.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennen, C.E. 1982 A review of added mass and fluid inertial forces. Tech. Rep. Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Buckingham, E. 1914 On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys. Rev. 4 (4), 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bujard, T., Giorgio-Serchi, F. & Weymouth, G.D. 2021 A resonant squid-inspired robot unlocks biological propulsive efficiency. Sci. Robot. 6 (50), eabd2971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childress, S. 1981 Mechanics of Swimming and Flying. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H. & Chen, S.S. 1984 Hydrodynamic mass. Tech. Rep. Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Crowdy, D. 2009 The spreading phase in Lighthill's model of the Weis–Fogh lift mechanism. J.Fluid Mech. 641, 195204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowdy, D. 2013 Analytical formulae for source and sink flows in multiply connected domains. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 27, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowdy, D. 2020 Solving Problems in Multiply Connected Domains. SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., Gray, J.O. & Caldwell, D.G. 2008 An end effector based on the Bernoulli principle for handling sliced fruit and vegetables. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 24, 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesen, T., Bürk, E., Fischmann, C., Gauchel, W., Zindl, M. & Verl, A. 2013 Advanced gripper development and tests for automated photovoltaic wafer handling. Assembly Autom. 33, 334344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goluzin, G.M. 1969 Geometric Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable, vol. 26. American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, C. & Taha, H.E. 2022 A variational theory of lift. J.Fluid Mech. 941, A58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D.J. 2013 Introduction to Electrodynamics, 4th ed. Pearson, re-published by Cambridge University Press in 2017.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.D. 1999 Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Lord 1849 On vis-viva of a liquid in motion. Camb. Dublin Math. J. 4, 107112.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1975 Hydrodynamics. University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, M. & Johnson, S.G. 2011 Is the electrostatic force between a point charge and a neutral metallic object always attractive? Am. J. Phys. 79 (8), 843849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberal, I., Lobet, M., Li, Y. & Engheta, N. 2020 Near-zero-index media as electromagnetic ideal fluids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117 (39), 2405024054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn Smith, S.G., Michelin, S. & Crowdy, D. 2008 The dipolar field of rotating bodies in two dimensions. J.Fluid Mech. 607, 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, K. & Czarnecki, A. 2019 Acceleration due to buoyancy and mass renormalization. Am. J. Phys. 87, 165170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. 1962 Theoretical Hydrodynamics. MacMillan & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Newman, J.N. 2018 Marine Hydrodynamics. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Olness, F. & Scalise, R. 2011 Regularization, renormalization, and dimensional analysis: dimensional regularization meets freshman E&M. Am. J. Phys. 79 (3), 306312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph W Earl Company Inc. 2014 Festo Bernoulli Gripper OGGB. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phSlc8B4kFo&t=6s.Google Scholar
Saad, T. & Majdalani, J. 2017 Extension of Kelvin's minimum energy theorem to incompressible fluid domains with open regions. J.Fluid Mech. 825, 208212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P.G. 1967 The self-propulsion of a deformable body in a perfect fluid. J.Fluid Mech. 28, 385389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P.G. 1993 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedov, L.I. 1965 Two-Dimensional Problems in Hydrodynamics and Aerodynamics. John Wiley & Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, S.C., Weymouth, G.D. & Triantafyllou, M.S. 2017 Added mass energy recovery of octopus-inspired shape change. J.Fluid Mech. 810, 155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchieu, A.A., Crowdy, D. & Leonard, A. 2010 Fluid-structure interaction of two bodies in an inviscid fluid. Phys. Fluids 22, 107101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W. 1848 Theorems with reference to the solution of certain partial differential equations. Camb. Dublin Math. J. 4, 84.Google Scholar
Valentín, D., Presas, A., Egusquiza, E. & Valero, C. 2014 Influence of the added mass effect and boundary conditions on the dynamic response of submerged and confined structures. In IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 22, p. 032042. IOP Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wambsganss, M.W., Chen, S.S. & Jendrzejczyk, J.A. 1974 Added mass and damping of a vibrating rod in confined viscous fluids. Tech. Rep. Argonne National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q. 2004 Interaction of two circular cylinders in inviscid fluid. Phys. Fluids 16, 44124425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymouth, G.D. & Triantafyllou, M.S. 2013 Ultra-fast escape of a deformable jet-propelled body. J.Fluid Mech. 721, 367385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G.B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves p. 651. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar