Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-18T03:23:53.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary-layer transition by interaction of discrete and continuous modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

YANG LIU ,
TAMER A. ZAKI  and
PAUL A. DURBIN
YANG LIU
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
TAMER A. ZAKI
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
PAUL A. DURBIN
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, IA 50011, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The natural and bypass routes to boundary-layer turbulence have traditionally been studied independently. In certain flow regimes, both transition mechanisms might coexist, and, if so, can interact. A nonlinear interaction of discrete and continuous Orr-Sommerfeld modes, which are at the origin of orderly and bypass transition, respectively, is found. It causes breakdown to turbulence, even though neither mode alone is sufficient. Direct numerical simulations of the interaction shows that breakdown occurs through a pattern of Λ-structures, similar to the secondary instability of Tollmien–Schlichting waves. However, the streaks produced by the Orr-Sommerfeld continuous mode set the spanwise length scale, which is much smaller than that of the secondary instability of Tollmien–Schlichting waves. Floquet analysis explains some of the features seen in the simulations as a competition between destabilizing and stabilizing interactions between finite-amplitude distortions.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 604 , 10 June 2008 , pp. 199 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Ghannam, B. J. & Shaw, R. 1980 Natural transition of boundary layers: the effects of turbulence, pressure gradient, and flow history. J. Mech. Engng Sci. 22, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, P., Berggren, M. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11 (1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolotti, F. P., Herbert, Th. & Spalart, P. R. 1992 Linear and nonlinear stability of the Blasius boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiko, A. V., Westin, K. J. A., Klingmann, B. G. B., Kozlov, V. V. & Alfredsson, P. H. 1994 Experiments in a boundary layer subjected to free stream turbulence. Part 2. The role of TS-waves in the transition process. J. Fluid Mech. 281, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1992 Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous flow. Phys. Fluids 4 (8), 1637–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossu, C. & Brandt, L. 2004 On Tollmien–Schlichting-like waves in streaky boundary layers. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 23, 815–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasel, H. F. 2002 Numerical investigation of the interaction of the Klebanoff-mode with a Tollmien–Schlichting wave. J. Fluid Mech. 450, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransson, J., Brandt, L., Talamelli, A. & Cossu, C. 2005 Experimental study of the stabilization of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by finite amplitude streaks. Phys. Fluids 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
Fransson, J., Talamelli, A., Brandt, L. & Cossu, C. 2006 Delaying transition to turbulence by a passive mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 064501–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gostelow, J. P., Blunden, A. R. & Walker, G. J. 1994 Effects of free-stream turbulence and adverse pressure gradients on boundary layer transition. J. Turbomachinery 116, 392404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T. 1983 Secondary instability of plane channel flow to subharmonic three-dimensional disturbances. Phys. Fluids 26, 871–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 487–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Perturbed vortical layers and shear sheltering. Fluid Dyn. Res. 24, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. D. & Walker, G. J. 2001 Natural transition phenomena on an axial flow compressor blade. J. Turbomachinery 123, 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, R. G. 2000 Bypass transition phenomena studied by computer simulation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. G. & Durbin, P. A. 2000 Simulations of bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1985 Experimental study of disturbances produced in a pre-transitional laminar boundary layer by weak free stream turbulence. AIAA Paper 85-1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1991 Studies on laminar boundary layer receptivity to free stream turbulence near a leading edge. In Boundary Layer Stability and Transition to Turbulence (ed. Reed, H. L. & Kobayashi, R.). ASME-FED 114, 2330.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1998 Experiments on boundary-layer receptivity to freestream turbulence. AIAA 98-0530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S., Tidstrom, K. D. & Sargent, L. M. 1962 The three-dimensional nature of boundary layer instability. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiser, L. & Zang, T. A. 1991 Numerical simulation of transition in wall-bounded shear flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 495–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. 2007 Transition to turbulence by mode interaction. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2000 Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. 404, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsubara, M. & Alfredsson, P. 2001 Disturbance growth in boundary layers subjected to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarajan, S., Lele, S. & Ferziger, J. 2007 Leading edge effects in bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 471–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1969 Shear-flow turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Kwak, D. & Vinokur, M. 1991 A fractional step solution method for the unsteady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in generalized coordinate systems. J. Comput. Phys. 94, 102–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwen, H. & Grosch, C. E. 1981 The continuous spectrum of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. Part 2. Eigenfunction expansions. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1936 Effect of turbulence on boundary layers. In Collected Papers of GI Taylor (ed. Batchelor, G.). Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Tumin, A. 2003 Multimode decomposition of spatially growing perturbations in a two-dimensional boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 15 (9), 2525–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, K. J. A., Boiko, A. V., Klingmann, B. G. B., Kozlov, V. V. & Alfredsson, P. H. 1994 Experiments in a boundary layer subjected to free stream turbulence. Part 1. Boundary layer structure and receptivity. J. Fluid Mech. 281, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Jacobs, R. G., Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Simulation of boundary layer transition induced by periodically passing wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 398, 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2005 Mode interaction and the bypass route to transition. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2006 Continuous mode transition and the effects of pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar