Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:15:06.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cavitation of a viscous fluid in narrow passages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

G. I. Taylor
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge

Abstract

The conditions which determine the existence and position of cavitation in the narrow passages of hydrodynamically lubricated bearings have been assumed to be the same as those which produce cavitation bubbles, namely a lowering of pressure below that at which gas separates out of fluid. This assumption enables certain predictions to be made which in some cases are verified, but it does not provide a physical description of the interface between oil and air. Theoretical analysis of the situation seems to be beyond our present capacity, and in none of the experiments so far published has it been possible to measure both the most important relevant data, namely the minimum clearance and the oil flow through it.

A method is described here which enables this to be done. It turns out that two physically different kinds of cavitation can occur. One of these is well described by the existing theory and assumption. Surface tension plays no part in it, and in most text books on hydrodynamic lubrication is not even mentioned. The other kind, which is akin to hydrodynamic separation rather than bubble cavitation, depends essentially on surface tension. Both kinds appear clearly in published photographs taken through transparent bearings, but the experimenters do not seem to have distinguished between them.

The reason why surface tension, which is only able to supply stresses that are exceedingly small compared with the pressure variation in the fluid itself, may have a large effect on the flow can be understood by considering the flow of a viscous fluid in a tube when blown out by air pressure applied at one end. For any given length of fluid the rate of outflow depends almost entirely on the pressure applied, the surface tension force being negligible; but the amount of fluid left in the tube after the air column has reached the end depends essentially on surface tension.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1963 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, W. H. & Mill, C. C. 1954 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 223, 41419.
Bretherton, F. P. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 10, 166.
Cole, J. A. & Hughes, C. J. 1956 Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 170, 499.
Cox, B. G. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14, 8196.
Fairbrother, F. & Stubbs, A. E. 1935 J. Chem. Soc. 1, 499.
Floberg, L. 1961a Dissertation, Chalmers Tech. Univ. Gothenberg.
Floberg, L. 1961b Trans. Chalmers Univ. no. 234.
Floberg, L. 1961c Trans. Chalmers Univ. no. 238.
Garabedian, P. R. 1957 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 241, 423.
Hopkins, M. R. 1957 Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 8, 442.
Jacquard, P. & Séquier, P. 1962 Journal de Mécanique, no. 4, 367.
Pearson, J. R. A. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 7, 481500.
Pitts, E. & Creiller, J. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 11, 3351.
Saffman, P. G. & Tayor, G. I. 1958 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 245, 312.
Sassenwald, H. & Walther, A. 1954 V.D.I. Forschungsheft, p. 441.
Stieber, W. 1933 Das Schwimmlager V.D.I. Berlin.
Swift, H. W. 1932 Proc. Inst. Civil Engrs, Lond., 233, 26788.
Taylor, G. I. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 10, 161.