Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:45:21.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental assessment of fractal scale-similarity in turbulent flows. Part 1. One-dimensional intersections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Richard D. Frederiksen
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2118, USA
Werner J. A. Dahm
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2118, USA
David R. Dowling
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125, USA

Abstract

Results are presented from an assessment of the applicability of fractal scale-similarity in the spatio–temporal structure of Sc [Gt ] 1 conserved scalar fields ζ(x, t) and scalar energy dissipation rate fields ∇(x, t) in turbulent flows. Over 2 million spatial and temporal intersections were analysed from fully resolved three-dimensional (256) spatial measurements as well as fully resolved four-dimensional spatio–temporal measurements containing up to 3 million points. Statistical criteria were used to assess both deterministic and stochastic fractal scale-similarity and to differentiate between fractal and random sets. Results span the range of spatio–temporal scales from the scalar diffusion scales (ΛD, TD) to the viscous diffusion scales (Λv, Tv) and to the outer scales (δ, Tδ). Over this entire range of scales, slightly over 99.0% of all intersections with the scalar dissipation support geometry showed scale-similarity as fractal as stochastically self-similar fBm sets having the same record length. Dissipation values above the mean were found to have support dimension D = 0.66. The dissipation support dimension decreased sharply with increasing dissipation values. Virtually no intersections showed scaling as random as a random set with the same relative cover. In contrast, intersections with scalar isosurfaces showed scaling only approximately as fractal as a corresponding fBm set and only over the range of spatio–temporal scales between (ΛD, TD) and (Λv, Tv). On these inner scales the isosurface dimension was D = 0.48 and was largely independent of the isoscalar value. At larger scales, scalar isosurfaces showed no fractal scale-similarity. In contrast, isoscalar level crossing sets showed no fractal scale-similarity over any range of scales, even though the scalar dissipation support geometry for the same data is clearly fractal. These results were found to be unaffected by noise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 113139.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Paladin, G., Parisi, G. & Vulpiani, A. 1984 On the multifractal nature of fully developed turbulence and chaotic systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Nucl. Gen. 17, 35213531.Google Scholar
Bevington, P. R. & Robinson, D. K. 1992 Data Reduction and Error Analysis in the Physical Sciences. McGraw-Hill.
Dahm, W. J. A., Southerland, K. B. & Buch, K. A. 1991 Direct, high-resolution, four-dimensional measurements of the fine scale structure of Sc 1 molecular mixing in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A 5, 11151127.Google Scholar
Dowling, D. R. 1991 The estimated scalar dissipation rate in gas-phase turbulent jets. Phys. Fluids A 3, 22292246.Google Scholar
Dubuc, B., Quiniou, J. F., Roques-Carmes, C., Tricot, C. & Zucker, S. W. 1989 Evaluating the fractal dimension of profiles. Phys. Rev. A 39, 15001512.Google Scholar
Feder, J. 1988 Fractals. Plenum Press.
Frederiksen, R. D., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1997a Experimental assessment of fractal scale similarity in turbulent flows. Part 2. Higher-dimensional intersections and non-fractal inclusions. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Frederiksen, R. D., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1997b Experimental assessment of fractal scale similarity in turbulent flows. Part 3. Multifractal scaling. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Frisch, U. & Parisi, G. 1985 In Turbulence and Predictability in Geophysical Fluid Mechanics and Climate Dynamics (ed. M. Ghil, R. Benzi & G. Parisi). North-Holland.
Frisch, U., Sulem, P. L. & Nelkin, M. 1978 A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 719736.Google Scholar
Grassberger, P. 1983 Generalized dimensions of strange attractors. Phys. Lett. A 97, 227230.Google Scholar
Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I. & Shraiman, B. I. 1986 Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets. Phys. Rev. A 33, 11411151.Google Scholar
Hentschel, H. G. E. & Procaccia, I. 1983 The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Physica D 8, 435444.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., Wray, A. A., Saffman, P. G. & Rogallo, R. S. 1993 The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 6590.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible fluid at very high Reynolds numbers. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS 30, 301305.Google Scholar
Lane-Serff, G. F. 1993 Investigation of the fractal structure of jets and plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 521534.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1974 Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 331358.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1982 The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1991 The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429484.Google Scholar
Miller, P. L. & Dimotakis, P. E. 1991 Stochastic geometric properties of scalar interfaces in turbulent jets. Phys. Fluids A 3, 168177.Google Scholar
Prasad, R. R., Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1988 The multifractal nature of the dissipation field of passive scalars in fully turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 7477.Google Scholar
Prasad, R. R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1990 The measurement and interpretation of fractal dimensions of the scalar interface in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A 2, 792807.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. 1992 Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Richardson, S. F. 1920 The supply of energy from and to atmospheric eddies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 97, 354373.Google Scholar
Southerland, K. B. & Dahm, W. J. A. 1994 A four-dimensional experimental study of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent flows. Rep. 026779-12. Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan.
Southerland, K. B., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1995 Experimental results for the high wavenumber spectral structure of scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows. In Proc. 10th Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1991 Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 539600.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Meneveau, C. 1986 The fractal facets of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 357386.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Prasad, R. R. 1989 New results on the fractal and multifractal structure of the large Schmidt number passive scalars in fully turbulent flows. Physica D 38, 322329.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R., Ramshankar, R. & Meneveau, C. 1989 Mixing, entrainment and fractal dimension of surfaces in turbulent flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 79108.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1935 Statistical theory of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 151, 421478.Google Scholar
Theiler, J. 1990 Estimating fractal dimension. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 10551073.Google Scholar