Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T05:09:27.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in concentric and eccentric annuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. M. Nouri ,
H. Umur  and
J. H. Whitelaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three components of mean velocity and the corresponding Reynolds shear stresses have been measured in fully developed concentric and eccentric annulus flows of a Newtonian fluid at bulk-flow Reynolds numbers of 8900 and 26600 and a weakly elastic shear-thinning polymer at effective bulk-flow Reynolds numbers of 1150, 6200 and 9600. The diameter ratio was 0.5 with eccentricities of 0, 0.5 and 1.0, and the use of a Newtonian fluid of refractive index identical to that of the Perspex working section facilitated the measurements by laser velocimetry.

With the Newtonian fluid, the distribution of static pressure measurements on the outer wall is shown to be linear, with friction factors for concentric-annulus flows some 8% higher than in a smooth round pipe and for the eccentric flows of eccentricities of 0.5 and 1.0 it was lower by, respectively 8 and 22.5% than that of the concentric-annulus flow. In the former case, the law of the wall was confirmed on both inner and outer walls of the annulus at both Reynolds numbers. This was also the case for the outer wall in the eccentric-annulus flows, except in the smallest gap, but the near-inner-wall flow was not represented by a logarithmic region particularly in the smallest gap. The locations of zero shear stress and zero velocity gradient were displaced by amounts which were, like the secondary flows measured in the eccentric annulus of 0.5, almost within the measurement precision. In the eccentric-annulus flow with eccentricity of 1.0, there was a secondary flow with two circulation cells on each side of the plane of symmetry and with a maximum velocity of 2.2% of the bulk velocity.

The measurements with the non-Newtonian fluid were less detailed since refraction limited the flow accessible to the light beams. The average wall shear stress coefficient was similar to that for the Newtonian fluid in the laminar region of the concentric-annulus flow and higher for the two eccentric-annulus flows. Transition was extended to an effective Reynolds number well above that for the Newtonian fluid with a drag reduction of up to 63%. The near-outer-wall flows had logarithmic forms between the Newtonian curve and that of the maximum drag-reduction asymptote, and all fluctuation levels were less than those for the Newtonian fluid, particularly the radial and tangential components.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 253 , August 1993 , pp. 617 - 641
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brighton, J. A. & Jones, J. B. 1964 Fully developed turbulent flow in annuli. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 86, 835–844.Google Scholar
Durst, F., Haas, R. & Interthal, W. 1982 Laminar and turbulent flows of dilute polymer solution: a physical model. Rheo. Acta 21, 572–577.Google Scholar
Durst, F., Melling, A. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1981 Principles and Practice of Laser-Doppler Anemometry, 2nd edn. Academic.
Jonsson, V. K. & Sparrow, E. M. 1966 Experimental on turbulent flow phenomena in eccentric annular ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 65–85.Google Scholar
Kacker, S. C. 1973 Some aspects of fully developed turbulent flow in non-circular ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 583–602.Google Scholar
Lawn, C. J. & Elliott, C. J. 1971 Fully developed turbulent flow through concentric annuli. CEGB Rep. RD/B/N 1878.
Lumley, J. L. 1977 Drag reduction in two phase and polymer flows. Phys. Fluids 20, S64–S71.Google Scholar
Melling, A. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1976 Turbulent flow in a rectangular duct. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 289–315.Google Scholar
Nouri, J. M. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1991 Particle velocity characteristics of dilute to moderately dense suspension flows in stirred reactors. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 18, 21–33.Google Scholar
Nouri, J. M., Whitelaw, J. H. & Yianneskis, M. 1988 A refractive index matching technique for solid/liquid flows. In Laser Anemometry in Fluid Mechanics vol. 3, p. 335.
Park, J. T., MANNHEIMER, R. J., GRIMLEY, T. A. & MARROW, T. B. 1989 Pipe flow measurements of a Transparent non-Newtonian slurry. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 111, 331–336.Google Scholar
Pinho, F. T. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1990 Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in a pipe. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 34, 129–144.Google Scholar
Pinho, F. T. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1991 The flow of non-Newtonian fluids over a confined baffle. J. Fluid Mech. 226, 475–196.Google Scholar
Quarmby, A. 1967 An experimental study of turbulent flow in concentric annuli. Intl J. Mech. Sci. 9, 205–221.Google Scholar
Rehme, K. 1974 Turbulent flow in smooth concentric annuli with small radius ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 263–287.Google Scholar
Shah, R. K. & London, A. L. 1978 Laminar flow forced convection in ducts. Academic.
Smith, S. L., LAWN, C. J. & Hamlin, M. J. 1968 The direct measurement of wall shear stress in an annulus. CEGB Rep RD/B/N 1232.
Sparrow, E. M., Eckert, E. R. & Minkowycz, W. J. 1963 Heat transfer and skin friction for turbulent boundary-layer flow longitudinal to a circular cylinder. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 30, 37–13.Google Scholar
Virk, P. S., Mickley, H. S. & Smith, K. A. 1970 The ultimate asymptote and mean flow structure in Toms' phenomenon. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 92, 488–493.Google Scholar