Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T18:05:04.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helicity generation and vorticity dynamics in helically symmetric flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Masanori Takaoka
Masanori Takaoka
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560, Japan Present address: Division of Physics and Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Helicity generation and vorticity dynamics in a helically symmetric flow are studied numerically by solving the Navier–Stokes equations in an unbounded domain. The helical symmetry reduces the problem to one in two dimensions, which makes it practicable to use an analytical expression for vortex surfaces. Furthermore, the field still retains three-dimensional aspects, such as helicity and vortex stretching. To every vortex surface there corresponds an inviscid invariant of helicity.

Our initial conditions are chosen as two cases of twisted elliptical tubes of high vorticity. The first case has elliptical vortex surfaces, which is a helically symmetric version of the initial condition employed by Aref & Zawadzki (1991), but the second case has axisymmetric vortex surfaces. The total helicity inside every vortex surface is zero in both the initial fields. It is found that vortex stretching plays an important role in the time evolution of the first case, but not of the second case.

We examine the relation of the vorticity dynamics to the helicity generation by using the representation of the vortex lines and the vortex surfaces rather than the equi-vorticity surfaces. This leads to new concepts for the mechanisms of formation of the spiral vortex structures observed for the two cases. The detailed investigation of the helicity generation is done by examining the distribution of the helicity on each vortex surface and the Fourier spectrum of helicity. The processes of helicity generation due to the vortex stretching are different for each initial condition. The viscosity dependence of ‘inviscid’ invariants shows that with smaller viscosity, only in the first case is more helicity generated. This is because in the first case where there is vortex stretching the contact zones of the adjacent vortex layers are elongated and the local vorticity is intensified to an extent limited by viscosity. Thus with smaller viscosity a more intense vortex is reconnected to generate more helicity. As expected, in both cases more of the energy is preserved with smaller viscosity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 319 , 25 July 1996 , pp. 125 - 149
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aref, H. & Zawadzki, I. 1991 Linking of vortex ring. Nature 354, 50–53.Google Scholar
Buntine, J. D. & Pullin, D. I. 1989 Merger and cancellation of strained vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 263–295.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1991 Generalized helical Beltrami flows in hydrodynamics and magneto hydrodynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 222, 525–541.Google Scholar
Frisch, U., She, Z. S. & Sulem, P. L. 1987 Large-scale flow driven by the anisotropic kinetic alpha effect. Physica D 28, 382–392.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. D. 1988 Spiral structures and spectra in two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 193, 475–497.Google Scholar
Grauer, R. & Sideris, T. C. 1991 Numerical computation of 3-D incompressible ideal fluids with swirl. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3511–3514.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Lord 1980 Vibrations of a columnar vortex. Phil. Mag. 10, 155–168.Google Scholar
Kida, S. & Takaoka, M. 1987 Bridging in vortex reconnection. Phys. Fluids 30, 2911–2924.Google Scholar
Kida, S. & Takaoka, M. 1988 Reconnection of vortex tubes. Fluid Dyn. Res. 3, 257–261.Google Scholar
Kida, S. & Takaoka, M. 1991 Breakdown of frozen motion and vorticity reconnection. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 60, 2184–2196.Google Scholar
Kida, S. & Takaoka, M. 1994 Vortex reconnection. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 169–189.Google Scholar
Kida, S., Takaoka, M. & Hussain, F. 1991 Collision of two vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 583–646.Google Scholar
Kida, S., Yamada, M. & Ohkitani, K. 1988 The energy spectrum in the universal range of two-dimensional turbulence. Fluid Dyn. Res. 4, 271–301.Google Scholar
Krause, F. & Rudiger, G. 1974 On the Reynolds stresses in mean-field hydrodynamics. Astron. Nachr. 295, 93–99.Google Scholar
Landman, M. J. 1990a Time-dependent helical waves in rotating pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 221, 289–310.Google Scholar
Landman, M. J. 1990b On the generation of helical waves in circular pipe flow. Phys. Fluids A 2, 738–747.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. 1982 Strained spiral vortex model for turbulent fine structure. Phys. Fluids 25, 2193–2203.Google Scholar
Mahalov, A., Titi, E. S. & Leibovich, S. 1990 Invariant helical subspaces for the Navier—Stokes equations. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 112, 193–222.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: causes and conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 303–340.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1969 The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 117–129.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1984 Simple topological aspects of turbulent vorticity dynamics. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Turbulence and Chaotic Phenomena in Fluids (ed. T. Tastumi), pp. 223–230. Elsevier.
Moffatt, H. K. & Ricca, R. L. 1992 Helicity and the Călugăreanu Invariant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 439, 411–429.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. & Tsinober, A. 1992 Helicity in laminar and turbulent flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech 24, 281–312.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Siggia, E. 1992 Finite-time singularities in the axisymmetric three-dimensional Euler equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1511–1514.Google Scholar
Takaoka, M. 1990 Some characteristics of exact strained solutions to the two dimensional Navier—Stokes equation. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 59, 2365–2373.Google Scholar
Takaoka, M. 1991 Straining effects and vortex reconnection of solutions to the 3-D Navier—Stokes equation. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 60, 2602–2612.Google Scholar
Tur, A. V. & Yanovsky, V. V. 1993 Invariants in dissipationless hydrodynamic media. J. Fluid Mech. 248, 67–106.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1992 The nature of triad interactions in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 4, 350–363.Google Scholar